Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 16, 2017

Representation and Salary Gaps by Race-Ethnicity and Gender at Selective Public Universities

Abstract

We use data from 2015–2016 to document faculty representation and wage gaps by race-ethnicity and gender in six fields at selective public universities. Consistent with widely available information, Black, Hispanic, and female professors are underrepresented and White and Asian professors are overrepresented in our data. Disadvantaged minority and female underrepresentation is driven predominantly by underrepresentation in science and math intensive fields. A comparison of senior and junior faculty suggests a trend toward greater diversity, especially in science and math intensive fields, because younger faculty are more diverse. However, Black faculty are an exception. We decompose racial-ethnic and gender wage gaps and show that academic field, experience, and research productivity account for most or all of the gaps. We find no evidence of wage premiums for individuals who improve diversity, although for Black faculty we cannot rule out a modest premium.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Arcidiacono P., Koedel C. (2014). Race and college success: Evidence from Missouri. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(3), 20–57.
Bayard K., Hellerstein J., Neumark D., Troske K. (1999). New evidence on sex segregation and sex differences in wages from matched employee-employer data (NBER Working Paper No. 7003). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Bettinger E. P., Long B. T. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. American Economic Review P&P, 95(2), 152–157.
Bollinger C. R., Hirsh B. T., Hokayem C. M., Ziliak J. P. (2014). Trouble in the tails? Earnings non-response and response bias across the distribution. Working paper.
Butcher K. F., McEwan P. J., Weerapana A. (2014). The effects of an anti-grade-inflation policy at Wellesley College. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 189–204.
Carnevale A. P., Fasules M. L., Porter A., Landis-Santos J. (2016). African Americans: College majors and earnings. Policy report. Washington, DC: Center on Education and the Workforce, Georgetown University.
Carrell S. E., Page M. E., West J. E. (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1101–1144.
Ceci S. J., Ginther D. K., Kahn S., Williams W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141.
Cherng H.-Y. S., Halpin P. F. (2016). The importance of minority teachers: Student perceptions of minority versus White teachers. Educational Researcher, 45(7), 407–420.
Dee T. S. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–2010.
Ellis J. R., Gershenson S. (2016). LATE for the meeting: Gender, peer advising, and college success (IZA Discussion Paper No. 9956). Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.
Fairlie R. W., Hoffmann F., Oreopoulos P. (2014). A community college instructor like me: Race and ethnicity interactions in the classroom. American Economic Review, 1049(8), 2567–2591
Freeman R. B. (1977). The new job market for Black academicians. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30(2), 161–174.
Garcia-Navarro L. (2016). For affirmative action, Brazil sets up controversial boards to determine race. NPR Parallels. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/09/29/495665329/for-affirmative-action-brazil-sets-up-controversial-boards-to-determine-race
Gelbach J. B. (2016). When do covariates matter? And which ones, and how much? Journal of Labor Economics, 34(2), 509–543.
Gershenson S., Holt S. B., Papageorge N. (2016). Who believes in me? The effect of student-teacher demographic match on teachers’ beliefs. Economics of Education Review, 52, 209–224.
Ginther D. K., Hayes K. J. (2003). Gender differences in salary and promotion for faculty in the humanities, 1977-95. Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), 34–73.
Ginther D. K., Schaffer W. T., Schnell J., Masimore B., Liu G., Haak L. L., Kington R. (2010). Diversity in academic biomedicine: An evaluation of education and career outcomes with implications for policy. Working paper.
Ginther D. K., Kahn S. (in press). Education and academic career outcomes for women of color in science and engineering. In Seeking solutions: Maximizing American talent by advancing women of color in academia. A conference report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Glover D., Parsad B., Zimbler L. J. (2002). The gender and racial/ethnic composition of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff, 1992-1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Grissom J. A., Kern E. C., Rodriguez L. A. (2015). The “representative bureaucracy” in education: Educator workforce diversity, policy outputs, and outcomes for disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 185–192.
Grissom J. A., Rodriguez L. A., Kern E. C. (2017). Teacher and principal diversity and the representation of students of color in gifted programs: Evidence from national data. Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 396–422.
Guarino C. M., Borden V. M. (in press). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education.
Koedel C. (2011). Grading standards in education departments at universities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(23), 1–23.
Menges R. J., Exum W. H. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 54(2), 123–144.
National Science Board. (2016). 2016 science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Nelson D. J., Brammer C. N. (2010). A national analysis of minorities in science and engineering faculties at research universities (2nd ed.). Unpublished policy report.
Olsen D., Maple S. A., Stage F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), 267–293.
Perry M., Reny P. J. (2016). How to count citations if you must. American Economic Review, 106(9), 2722–2741.
Porter S. R. (2007). A closer look at faculty service: What affects participation on committees? Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 523–41.
Porter S. R., Toutkoushian R. K., Moore J. V. III. (2008). Pay inequities for recently hired faculty, 1988-2004. Review of Higher Education, 31(4), 465–487.
Robst J., Keil J., Russo D. (1998). The effect of gender composition of faculty on student retention. Economics of Education Review, 17(4), 429–439.
Toutkoushian R. K., Bellas M. L., Moore J. V. (2007). The interaction effects of gender, race, and marital status on faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 572–601.
Toutkoushian R. K., Hoffman E. (2002). Alternatives for measuring the unexplained wage gap. In Toutkoushian R. (Ed.), Conducting salary-eq6 studies: Alternative approaches to research (New Directions for Institutional Research No. 115, pp. 71–89. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Biographies

DIYI LI is a PhD candidate in the Economics Department at the University of Missouri–Columbia, 118 Professional Building, Columbia, MO 65211; [email protected]. His research focuses on schooling efficacy in K–12 and higher education.
CORY KOEDEL, PhD, is an associate professor of economics and public policy at the University of Missouri–Columbia, 118 Professional Building, Columbia, MO 65211; [email protected]. His research focuses on schooling efficacy in K–12 and higher education.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 16, 2017
Issue published: October 2017

Keywords

  1. descriptive analysis
  2. diversity
  3. educational policy
  4. higher education
  5. policy analysis
  6. postsecondary education
  7. regression analyses

Rights and permissions

© 2017 AERA.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Diyi Li
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
Cory Koedel
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Educational Researcher.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9822

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 124

  1. Lessons from the Diversity Forum at the 2023 Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. The development of science identity through near peer mentoring and research experiences
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Rethinking equity and assessment through opportunity to learn
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Racism, not race: Quantitative analysis of the use of race and racism in the addiction literature
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Using longitudinal qualitative research to understand the experiences of minoritized people
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diversity trends among faculty in STEM and non-STEM fields at selective public universities in the U.S. from 2016 to 2023
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Undergraduate Grading Practices of International and Domestic Faculty: Evidence From Three Large U.S. Public Universities
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Racialized Horizontal Stratification in US Higher Education: Politics, Process, and Consequences
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Building a wisdom community through femtoring/mentoring: Latinx faculty and students at a Hispanic-serving institution
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. The 2023 GEM climate survey: results and recommendations
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

AERA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

AERA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text