Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published September 2007

A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin’s Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions

Abstract

This theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning (SRL) seeks to highlight how the model sheds new light on current research as well as suggests interesting new directions for future work. The authors assert that the model’s more complex cognitive architecture, inclusion of monitoring and control within each phase of learning, and separation of task definition and goal setting into separate phases are all important contributions to the SRL literature. New research directions are outlined, including more nuanced interpretations of judgments of learning and the potential to more thoroughly assess the influence of interactions among cognitive and task conditions on all phases of learning.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Figure and Table

FIGURE 1 Winne and Hadwin’s (1998) model of self-regulated learning.
Source.Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing (p. 164). In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Reprinted with permission from the publisher.
TABLE 1 List and count of journal articles and book chapters reviewed by area of Winne and Hadwin’s (1998) model of self-regulated learning
AreaCountAuthor(s)
Task conditions
Context6Bråten, Samuelstuen, & Strømsø (2004)
  Eshel & Kohavi (2003)
  Linnenbrink & Pintrich (2001)
  Perry (1998)
  Perry, Phillips, & Dowler (2004)
  Young (1996)
Teacher influences15Azevedo & Cromley (2004)
  Bielacyzc, Pirolli, & Brown (1995)
  Bohn, Roehrig, & Pressley (2004)
  Butler (1995)
  Butler (1998)
  Butler (2002)
  Dolezal, Mohan Welsh, Pressley, & Vincent (2003)
  Nietfeld & Schraw (2002)
  Paris & Paris (2001)
  Perels, Gürtler R., & Schmitz (2005)
  Perry, VandeKamp, Mercer, & Norby (2002)
  Perry, Phillips, & Dowler (2004)
  Rozendaal, Minnaert, & Boekaerts (2005)
  Wade & Trathen (1989)
  Winne & Jamieson-Noel (2003)
Time2Thiede & Dunlosky (1999)
  Winne & Jamieson-Noel (2003)
Cognitive conditions
Motivation26Alexander, Kulikowich, & Jetton (1994)
  Alexander & Murphy (1999)
  Bandura (1997)
  Deci & Ryan (1985)
  Deci, Koestner, & Ryan (1999)
  Eccles & Wigfield (2002)
  Elliott & Harackiewicz (1996)
  Elliott & McGregor (2001)
  Finney & Schraw (2003)
  Harackiewicz, Baron, Pintrich, Elliot, & Thrash (2002)
  Hidi (2001)
  Midgley, Kaplan, & Middleton (2001)
  Murphy & Alexander (2000)
  Pintrich (2000)
  Pintrich (2004)
  Pintrich & De Groot (1990)
  Pintrich & Schunk (2002)
  Robbins et al. (2004)
  Ryan & Deci (2000)
  Schiefele, Krapp, & Winteler (1992)
  Schunk & Pajares (2002)
  Stone (2000)
  Wigfield & Eccles (2002)
  Wigfield, Eccles, Schiefele, Roesner, & Davis-Kean (1997)
  Wigfield et al. (2006)
  Zusho & Pintrich (2000)
Domain knowledge7Alexander (1995)
  Alexander (1997)
  Alexander, Sperl, Buehl, Fives, & Chiu (2004)
  Ericsson (2005)
  Ericsson & Charness (1994)
  Murphy & Alexander (2002)
  Nietfeld & Schraw (2002)
Beliefs, dispositions, and styles14Baxter Magolda (1992)
  Buehl & Alexander (2004)
  Butler & Winne (1995)
  Carver & Scheier (1990)
  Hofer (2000)
  Hofer & Pintrich (1997)
  King & Kitchener (1994)
  Murphy, Alexander, Greene, & Edwards (2004)
  Paulsen & Feldman (1999)
  Paulsen & Feldman (2005)
  Schommer (1990)
  Schommer (1993)
  Schommer, Crouse, & Rhodes (1992)
  Snow, Corno, & Jackson (1996)
Operations and products4Logan (1998)
  Paas & Kester (2006)
  Sweller (2006)
  Winne (2001)
Standards5Locke & Latham (2002)
  Morgan (1987)
  Oettingen, Honig, & Gollwitzer (2000)
  Ridley, Schutz, Glanz, & Weinstein (1992)
  Schwartz & Gredler (1998)
Monitoring10Butler & Winne (1995)
  Delclos & Harrington (1991)
  Lan, Bradley, & Parr (1993)
  Lan (1996)
  Pintrich & De Groot (1990)
  Schraw (1994)
  Schraw, Horn, Thorndike-Christ, & Bruning (1995)
  Schraw & Nietfeld (1998)
  Stone (2000)
  Winne (2001)
Cognitive evaluations15De Bruin, Rikers, & Schmidt (2005)
  Dunlosky & Nelson (1992)
  Hacker, Bol, Horgan, & Rakow (2000)
  Koriat (1997)
  Kruger & Dunning (1999)
  Maki & Serra (1992)
  Peverly, Brobst, & Graham (2003)
  Pintrich (1999)
  Pressley, Ghatala, Woloshyn, & Pirie (1990)
  Sinkavich (1995)
  Stone (2000)
  Thiede & Anderson (2003)
  Thiede & Dunlosky (1999)
  Thiede, Anderson, & Therriault (2003)
  Winne & Jamieson-Noel (2002)
Control4Azevedo & Cromley (2004)
  Ghatala, Levin, Pressley, & Lodico (1985)
  Ley and Young (1998)
  Nelson, Dunlosky, Graf, & Narens (1994)
External evaluations and performance5Butler & Winne (1995)
  Schunk (1982)
  Schunk (1983)
  Schunk & Cox (1986)
  Stone (2000)

References

Alexander P. Superimposing a situation-specific and domain-specific perspective on an account of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 1995;30 4 189-193
Alexander P. Maehr ML and Pintrich PR. Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. Advances in motivation and achievement 1997 Greenwich, CT JAI 213-250
Alexander PA, Kulikowich JM, and Jetton TL. The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research 1994;64:201-252
Alexander PA and Murphy PK. Nurturing the seeds of transfer: A domain-specific perspective. International Journal of Educational Research 1999;31:561-576
Alexander PA, Sperl CT, Buehl MM, Fives H, and Chiu S. Modeling domain learning: Profiles from the field of special education. Journal of Educational Psychology 2004;96:545-557
Anderson J and Labiere C. The atomic components of thought 1998 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum
Anderson JR, Bothell D, Byrne MD, Douglass S, Lebiere C, and Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 2004;111 4 1036-1060
Azevedo R and Cromley JG. Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia?. Journal of Educational Psychology 2004;96 3 523-535
Azevedo R, Cromley JG, and Seibert D. Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia?. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2004;29 3 344-370
Azevedo R, Cromley JG, Winters FI, Moos DC, and Greene JA. Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science 2005;33:381-412
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control 1997 New York W. H. Freeman
Baxter Magolda MB. Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development 1992 San Francisco Jossey-Bass
Bielacyzc K, Pirolli PL, and Brown AL. Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition & Instruction 1995;13 2 221-252
Boekaerts M, Pintrich P, and Zeidner M. Handbook of self-regulation 2000 San Diego, CA Academic Press
Bohn CM, Roehrig AD, and Pressley M. The first days of school in the classrooms of two more effective and four less effective primary-grades teachers. Elementary School Journal 2004;104:269-287
Bråten I, Samuelstuen MS, and Strømsø HI. Do students’ self-efficacy beliefs moderate the effects of performance goals on self-regulatory strategy use?. Educational Psychology 2004;24:231-247
Buehl MM and Alexander PA. Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Education Research Journal 2005;42:697-726
Butler D and Winne PH. Feedback as self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Review 1995;65:245-281
Butler DL. Promoting strategic learning by postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1995;28 3 170-190
Butler DL. The strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning: A report of three studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998;90:682-697
Butler DL. Individualizing instruction in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice 2002;41:81-92
Carver CS and Scheier MF. Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review 1990;97:19-35
Damasio AR. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain 1994 New York Avon
de Bruin ABH, Rikers RMJP, and Schmidt HG. Monitoring accuracy and self-regulation when learning to play a chess endgame. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2005;19:167-181
Deci EL, Koestner R, and Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 1999;125:627-668
Deci EL and Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior 1985 New York Plenum
Delclos VR and Harrington C. Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 1991;83 1 35-42
Dolezal SR, Mohan Welsh L, Pressley M, and Vincent MM. How nine third-grade teachers motivate student academic engagement. Elementary School Journal 2003;103:240-267
Dunlosky J and Nelson TO. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition 1992;20 4 374-380
Eccles JS and Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology 2002;53:109-132
Elliot AJ and Harackiewicz JM. Approach and avoidance goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996;70:461-475
Elliot AJ and McGregor H. A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001;80:501-509
Ericsson KA. Recent advances in expertise research: A commentary on the contributions to the special issue. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2005;19:233-241
Ericsson KA and Charness N. Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist 1994;49:725-747
Eshel Y and Kohavi R. Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology 2003;23 3 249-260
Finney SJ and Schraw G. Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2003;26:161-186
Garavalia L and Ray M. Distinctions among subgroups of developmental students: Differences in task value, self-regulated learning, and grade expectations. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education 2003;19 2 29-40
Ghatala ES, Levin JR, Pressley M, and Lodico MG. Training cognitive strategy-monitoring in children. American Educational Research Journal 1985;22 2 199-215
Greeno JG. the Middle School Mathematics Through Application Project Group. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist 1998;51:5-26
Hacker DJ, Bol L, Horgan DD, and Rakow EA. Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology 2000;92 1 160-170
Harackiewicz JM, Baron KE, Pintrich PR, Elliot AJ, and Thrash TM. Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology 2002;94:638-645
Hidi S. Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review 2001;13:191-209
Hofer BK. Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000;25:378-405
Hofer BK and Pintrich PR. The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research 1997;67:88-140
King PM and Kitchener KS. Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults 1994 San Francisco Jossey-Bass
Kirschner PA, Sweller J, and Clark RE. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 2006;41:75-86
Koriat A. Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997;126 4 349-370
Kruger J and Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999;77:1121-1134
Lan WY. The effects of self-monitoring on students’ course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation. Journal of Experimental Education 1996;64 2 101-115
Lan WY, Bradley L, and Parr G. The effects of a self-monitoring process on college students’ learning in an introductory statistics course. Journal of Experimental Education 1993;61 1 26-40
Ley K and Young DB. Self-regulation behaviors in underprepared (developmental) and regular admission college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1998;23 1 42-64
Linnenbrink EA and Pintrich PR. Volet S and Jarvela S. Multiple goals, multiple contexts: The dynamic interplay between personal goals and contextual goal stresses. Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications 2001 New York Elsevier 251-269
Locke EA and Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist 2002;57:705-717
Logan GD. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 1988;95:492-527
Maki RH and Serra M. Role of practice tests in the accuracy of test predictions on text material. Journal of Educational Psychology 1992;84 2 200-210
Midgley C, Kaplan A, and Middleton M. Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, and under what circumstances?. Journal of Educational Psychology 2001;93:77-87
Morgan M. Self-monitoring and goal setting in private study. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1987;12:1-6
Murphy PK and Alexander PA. What counts? The predictive powers of subject-matter knowledge, strategic processing, and interest in domain-specific performance. Journal of Experimental Education 2002;70:197-214
Murphy PK, Alexander PA, Greene JA, and Edwards MA. Epistemological threads in the fabric of conceptual change research 2004 May Paper presented at the Fourth European Symposium on Conceptual Change—Philosophical, Historical, Psychological and Educational Approaches Delphi, Greece
Nelson TO, Dunlosky J, Graf A, and Narens L. Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science 1994;5:207-213
Newell A. Unified theories of cognition 1990 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
Newell A and Simon HA. Human problem solving 1972 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall
Nietfeld JL and Schraw G. The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. Journal of Educational Research 2002;95 3 131-143
Oettingen G, Honig G, and Gollwitzer PM. Effective self-regulation of goal attainment. International Journal of Educational Research 2000;33 7–8 705-732
Paas F and Kester L. Learner and information characteristics in the design of powerful learning environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2006;20:281-285
Paris SG and Paris AH. Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 2001;36 2 89-101
Paulsen MB and Feldman KA. Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning. Journal of Staff, Program and Organizational Development 1999;16:83-91
Paulsen MB and Feldman KA. The conditional and interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: Motivational strategies. Research in Higher Education 2005;46:731-768
Perels F, Gürtler R, and Schmitz B. Training of self-regulatory and problem-solving competence. Learning and Instruction 2005;15:123-139
Perry N, Phillips L, and Dowler J. Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record 2004;106:1854-1878
Perry N, VandeKamp KO, Mercer LK, and Nordby CJ. Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 2002;37:5-15
Perry NE. Young children’s self-regulated learning and the contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998;90:715-729
Perry NE, Turner JC, and Meyer DK. Alexander PA and Winne PH. Classrooms as contexts for motivating learning. Handbook of educational psychology 2006 2 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum 327-348
Peverly ST, Brobst KE, and Graham M. College adults are not good at self-regulation: A study on the relationship of self-regulation, note taking, and test taking. Journal of Educational Psychology 2003;95 2 335-346
Pintrich P and De Groot E. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990;82 2 33-40
Pintrich P and Zusho A. Wigfield A and Eccles J. The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. Development of achievement motivation 2002 San Diego, CA Academic Press 249-284
Pintrich PR. Understanding interference and inhibition processes from a motivational and self-regulated learning perspective: Comments on Dempster and Corkill. Educational Psychology Review 1999;11 2 105-115
Pintrich PR. Boekaerts M, Pintrich P, and Zeidner M. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. Handbook of self regulation 2000 New York Academic Press 452-502
Pintrich PR. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review 2004;16:385-407
Pintrich PR and Schunk DH. Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application 2002 2 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall
Pressley M, Ghatala ES, Woloshyn V, and Pirie J. Sometimes adults miss the main ideas and do not realize it: Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiple-choice comprehension questions. Reading Research Quarterly 1990;25 3 232-249
Pressley M and Harris KR. Alexander PA and Winne PH. Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. Handbook of educational psychology 2006 2 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum 265-286
Ridley DS, Schutz PA, Glanz RS, and Weinstein CE. Self-regulated learning: The interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education 1992;60 4 293-306
Robbins SB, Lauver K, Le H, Davis D, Langley R, and Carlstrom A. Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2004;130:261-288
Rozendaal JS, Minnaert A, and Boekaerts M. The influence of teacher perceived administration of self-regulated learning on students’ motivation and information-processing. Learning and Instruction 2005;15:141-160
Ruban LM, McCoach DB, McGuire JM, and Reis SM. The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2003;36 3 270-287
Ryan RM and Deci EL. Sansone C and Harackiewicz JM. When rewards compete with nature: The undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance 2000 San Diego, CA Academic Press 13-54
Schiefele U, Krapp A, and Winteler A. Renninger KA, Hidi S, and Krapp A. Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. The role of interest in learning and development 1992 Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum 183-212
Schommer M. Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990;82 3 498-504
Schommer M. Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology 1993;85 3 406-411
Schommer M, Crouse A, and Rhodes N. Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology 1992;84:435-443
Schraw G. The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1994;19:143-154
Schraw G, Horn C, Thorndike-Christ T, and Bruning R. Academic goal orientations and student classroom achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1995;20:359-368
Schraw G and Nietfeld J. A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998;90 2 236-248
Schunk DH. Effects of effort attributional feedback on children’s perceived self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982;74:548-556
Schunk DH. Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 1983;75:848-856
Schunk DH and Cox PD. Strategy training and attributional feedback with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology 1986;78:201-209
Schunk DH. Learning theories: An educational perspective 1991 New York Merrill/Macmillan
Schunk DH and Pajares F. Wigfield A and Eccles JS. The development of academic self-efficacy. Development of achievement motivation 2002 San Diego, CA Academic Press 15-32
Schwartz LS and Gredler ME. The effects of self-instructional materials on goal setting and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education 1998;31 2 83-89
Siegler RS. Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking 1996 New York Oxford University Press
Sinkavich FK. Performance and metamemory: Do students know what they don’t know?. Journal of Instructional Psychology 1995;22 1 77-88
Snow RE, Corno L, and Jackson D III. Berliner DC and Calfee RC. Individual differences in affective and conative functions. Handbook of educational psychology 1996 New York Macmillan 243-310
Stone NJ. Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review 2000;12:437-475
Sweller J. Discussion of “Emerging topics in cognitive load research: Using learner and information characteristics in the design of powerful learning environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2006;20:353-357
Thiede KW and Anderson MCM. Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2003;28 2 129-160
Thiede KW, Anderson MCM, and Therriault D. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology 2003;95 1 66-73
Thiede KW and Dunlosky J. Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999;25 4 1024-1037
VanZile-Tamsen C and Livingston JA. The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high- and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development 1999;40 1 54-60
Wade SE and Trathen W. Effect of self-selected study methods on learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 1989;81 1 40-47
Wigfield A and Eccles JS. Wigfield A and Eccles JS. The development of competence beliefs and values from childhood through adolescence. Development of achievement motivation 2002 San Diego, CA Academic Press 92-120
Wigfield A, Eccles JS, Schiefele U, Roesner R, and Davis-Kean P. Damon W and Lerner RM. Development of achievement motivation. Handbook of child psychology 2006 6 Hoboken, NJ John Wiley 933-1002
Wigfield A, Eccles JS, Yoon KS, Harold RD, Arbreton A, Freedman-Doan C, et al. Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997;89:451-469
Winne PH. Zimmerman BJ and Schunk DH. Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives 2001 2 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum 153-189
Winne PH and Hadwin AF. Hacker DJ, Dunlosky J, and Graesser A. Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in educational theory and practice 1998 Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum 277-304
Winne PH and Jamieson-Noel D. Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2002;27 4 551-572
Winne PH and Jamieson-Noel D. Self-regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students’ reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2003;28 3 259-276
Winne PH and Perry NE. Boekaerts M, Pintrich P, and Zeidner M. Measuring self-regulated learning. Handbook of self-regulation 2000 San Diego, CA Academic Press 531-566
Wolters CA. Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 2003;38 4 189-205
Young JD. The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology, Research and Development 1996;44 2 17-27
Zimmerman BJ. Zimmerman BJ and Schunk D. Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice 1989 New York Springer-Verlag 1-25
Zimmerman BJ. Boekaerts M, Pintrich P, and Zeidner M. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. Handbook of self regulation 2000 New York Academic Press 13-39
Zimmerman BJ. Zimmerman BJ and Schunk D. Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives 2001 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum 1-38
Zimmerman BJ. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich JP, and Hoffman RR. Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance 2006 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 705-722
Zimmerman BJ and Kitsantas A. Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology 2002;94 4 660-668
Zimmerman BJ and Schunk D. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives 2001 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum
Zusho A and Pintrich PR. Fear of not learning? The role of mastery avoidance goals in Asian American and European American college students 2000 April Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association New Orleans, LA

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: September 2007
Issue published: September 2007

Keywords

  1. cognition
  2. information-processing theory
  3. metacognition
  4. review
  5. self-regulated learning

Rights and permissions

© 2007.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jeffrey Alan Greene
University of Maryland
Roger Azevedo

Notes

JEFFREY ALAN GREENE received his PhD from the Department of Human Development at the University of Maryland. He is currently an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill; e-mail: [email protected]. His specialization is in educational psychology. His research interests include self-regulated learning, epistemic cognition, and applications of latent variable modeling.
ROGER AZEVEDO is an associate professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Memphis, 400 Innovation Drive, Memphis, TN 38152–6400; e-mail: [email protected]. His research interests include self-regulated learning, using computers as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning, and learning about complex and challenging science topics.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Review of Educational Research.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 5787

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 248 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 245

  1. What Learning Strategies are Used by Programming Students? A Qualitati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Impact of AI assistance on student agency
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Examining change in students’ self-regulated learning patterns after a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Enacting control with student dashboards: The role of motivation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The good and bad of an online asynchronous general education course: S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Modeling learning behaviors and predicting performance in an intellige...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Cognitive load patterns affect temporal dynamics of self-regulated lea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The Relationship Between Self-Regulated Learning Competency and Clinic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Effects of Audio Feedback in an Online Assessment in Students’ Academi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Educational Design Principles of Using AI Chatbot That Supports Self-R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A Theoretical and Metatheoretical Reframing of the Development of Cogn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. How Does Cognitive Load Interact with Self-Regulated Learning? A Dynam...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Analytics of self-regulated learning scaffolding: effects on learning ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. A multi-level growth modeling approach to measuring learner attention ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Do Students’ Questions during Chemistry Lectures Predict Perceived Com...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Breaking the mold: Study strategies of students who improve their achi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Using eye tracking to examine expert-novice differences during simulat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. How students view online knowledge: Epistemic beliefs, self-regulated ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Enhancing Sustainable Arts Education: Comparative Analysis of Creative...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Let Learners Monitor the Learning Content and Their Learning Behavior!...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Task complexity affects temporal characteristics of self-regulated lea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Time-driven modeling of student self-regulated learning in network-bas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Impact of more realistic and earlier practice exams on student metacog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Metacognitive Monitoring via Strategies and Judgments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Goal-setting in support of learning during search: An exploration of l...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Fostering regulatory processes using computational scaffolding
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning in Online Professional Training
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. From self-regulated learning to computer-delivered integrated speaking...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Assessing Learner Engagement and the Impact on Academic Performance wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Progression of students' SRL processes in subsequent programming probl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Taking notes as a strategy for solving reality-based tasks in mathemat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Determinants of learning outcomes with online teaching based on studen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Measuring and Validating Assumptions About Self-Regulated Learning wit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Adaptive or adapted to: Sequence and reflexive thematic analysis to un...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Do Learners Appreciate Adaptivity? An Epistemic Network Analysis of Ho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Yükseköğretimde Öz Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerileri ve Modellerine İlişk...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Improving metacognition through self-explication in a digital self-reg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. A Heuristic Assessment Framework for the Design of Self-Regulated Lear...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Structure, relationship, and determinants of monitoring strategies and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Understanding Self-Regulated Learning and Its Importance in Online Lea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. The Promises and Pitfalls of Self-regulated Learning Interventions in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Online self‐regulated learning and academic procrastination: A moderat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Enhancing Oral Academic English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) throu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Developing self-efficacy through an extra preparatory school year: Low...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. A Path Analysis Model of Self- vs. Educational-Context- Regulation as ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Wie Familienmerkmale und Lernverhalten von Schüler*innen den Effekt vo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Knowledge Translation Research to Promote Behavior Changes in Rehabili...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Peer Assessment and Video Feedback for Fostering Self, Co, and Shared ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Self-regulated learning as a complex dynamical system: Examining stude...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Personality Traits as Predictors of Self-Regulated Learning and Academ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Res...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. The Role of Self-Improving Tutoring Systems in Fostering Pre-Service T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Educational programs for learning to observe movement quality in physi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Pedagogical Agent Support and Its Relationship to Learners’ Self-regul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. SR-WMS: A Typology of Self-Regulation in Writing from Multiple Sources
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Examining the critical role of evaluation and adaptation in self-regul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions, Definitions, a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Learning Analytics to Reveal Links Between Learning Design and Self-Re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Executive Function and Metacognition: Relations and Measure on High In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Students matter the most in learning analytics: The effects of interna...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Longitudinal self-directed competence development of university studen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. The Impact and Gender Difference of Learning Motivation and Self-Regul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Revealing the hidden structure of physiological states during metacogn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Methodological progress in the study of self-regulated learning enable...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Item-level monitoring, response style stability, and the hard-easy eff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Changes in metacognitive monitoring accuracy in an introductory physic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. What can moment-by-moment learning curves tell about students’ self-re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Comparing the roles and correlates of emotions in class and during onl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Predictive Student Modeling in Game-Based Learning Environments with W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. A Theoretical and Evidence-Based Conceptual Design of MetaDash: An Int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Revealing Data Feature Differences Between System- and Learner-Initiat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Data Visualizations to Foster Self-regulated Learning with Intelligent...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Evaluating LA Dashboard in Secondary School and Higher Education: Fost...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Exploring Interactions Between Motivation and Cognition to Better Shap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Predicting achievement and providing support before STEM majors begin ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Teacher Support of Co- and Socially-Shared Regulation of Learning in M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Adults’ Self-Regulatory Behaviour Profiles in Blended Learning Environ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. The design risks framework: Understanding metacognition for iteration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Diseño de tareas para promover aprendizaje autorregulado en la univers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Modeling Metacomprehension Monitoring Accuracy with Eye Gaze on Inform...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Peer-Prompted Engineering Design: How Do Adolescents Interact and Stra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. College students' regulation of cognition, motivation, behavior, and c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its rela...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. A Predictive System Informed by Students’ Similar Behaviour
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Understanding Self-Regulated Learning and Its Importance in Online Lea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. Background Similarities as a Way to Predict Students’ Behaviour
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Autorregulación y metacognición en el aprendizaje: un modelo de integr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Scaffolding student teachers' information‐seeking behaviours with a ne...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Linguistic characteristics of reflective states in video annotations u...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. The effect of cues for calibration on learners' self-regulated learnin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. The concreteness of titles affects metacognition and study motivation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Pay attention to digital text: The impact of the media on text compreh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Granularity matters: comparing different ways of measuring self-regula...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Teaching study skills in mathematics service courses—how to cope with ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. Towards Hybrid Human-System Regulation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Examining Gaze Behaviors and Metacognitive Judgments of Informational ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Past and Present of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) in Digital Learning ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. A Framework for Self-Regulated Project-Based Learning in Higher Educat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Unpacking the ‘Learning' in Student-Facing Analytics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Monitoring in collaborative learning: Co-occurrence of observed behavi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Anchoring the Creative Process Within a Self-Regulated Learning Framew...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. Learning Strategies for First-Year Biology: Toward Moving the “Murky M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Impact and educational outcomes of a small group self‐directed teachin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. The role of scaffold interactivity in supporting self-regulated learni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Chapter 3. Cognitive processes and digital reading
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Modeling Learners' Cognitive and Affective States to Scaffold SRL in O...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. Helping students to become capable learners
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. The influence of students' cognitive and motivational characteristics ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Ineffective learning strategies: a significant barrier to post-seconda...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. How Do We Model Learning at Scale? A Systematic Review of Research on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. The Influence of Motivational Regulation Strategies on Online Students...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Applying Self-regulated Learning to the Dynamic STEM Classroom
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. The role of self-regulated learning in students' success in flipped un...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. How Immersive Virtual Environments Foster Self-Regulated Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. Examining students’ self-set goals for self-regulated learning: Goal p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. Relationships between motivational strategies and cognitive learning i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. Statistical Literacy as a Function of Online Versus Hybrid Course Deli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  122. Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  123. Extending the testing effect to self-regulated learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  124. In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  125. A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  126. Self-regulated learning microanalysis as a tool to inform professional...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  127. Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  128. Prompted Self-Regulated Learning Assessment and Its Effect for Achievi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  129. Self-regulated learning in higher education: strategies adopted by com...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  130. Mining the Edublogosphere to Enhance Teacher Professional Development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  131. The effects of strategy training and an extrinsic incentive on fourth-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  132. Developing an integrated framework of problem-based learning and coach...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  133. Eliciting Reciprocal Peer-Tutoring Groups’ Metacognitive Regulation Th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  134. Nontraditional student withdrawal from undergraduate accounting progra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  135. The Relation Between Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  136. Examining evolutions in the adoption of metacognitive regulation in re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  137. The effect of audio recording and playback on self-assessment among mi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  138. The Effects of Motivation, Academic Emotions, and Self-Regulated Learn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  139. Measuring the impact of technological scaffolding interventions on mic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  140. Generalizing screen inferiority - does the medium, screen versus paper...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  141. Supporting science learning in linguistically diverse classrooms: Fact...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  142. The Effect of Metacognitive Scaffolds on Low Achievers’ Laboratory Lea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  143. Teaching Reading and Viewing to L2 Learners
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  144. CONTENT ANALYSIS OF 1998–2012 EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN SCIENCE READING USI...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  145. 16. La présentation d’un article de recherche de type théorique Articl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  146. Critical features of peer assessment of clinical performance to enhanc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  147. The Impact of a Summer Bridge Program on Nontraditional Student Develo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  148. Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  149. Similarities and Differences in Self-Regulated Learning Processes in S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  150. A latent profile analysis of university students’ self-regulated learn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  151. Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  152. Contrasting case instruction can improve self-assessment of writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  153. Self‐regulated learning in healthcare profession education: theoretica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  154. Les facteurs psychologiques qui ont un effet sur la réussite des étudi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  155. Regulation During Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: A Theory-Bas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  156. Using multiple, contextualized data sources to measure learners’ perce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  157. An Innovative Peer Assessment Approach to Enhance Guideline Adherence ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  158. Effects of sequences of socially regulated learning on group performan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  159. A critical consideration of the alignment between the discourse of sel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  160. The Relationship between Self-Regulation, Personal Epistemology, and B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  161. How self-regulation helps to master negotiation challenges: An overvie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  162. Promoting Self-regulated Learning in an Intelligent Tutoring System fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  163. Self-regulation: A Critical Learner Characteristic for Seamless Learni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  164. Causal Models and Big Data Learning Analytics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  165. A Multimedia Adaptive Tutoring System for Mathematics that Addresses C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  166. A case of technology-enhanced formative assessment and achievement in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  167. Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  168. Multimedia Learning of Metacognitive Strategies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  169. Long-Term Self-Regulation of Biology Learning Using Standard Junior Hi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  170. Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  171. The effect of concrete supplements on metacognitive regulation during ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  172. Assisting learning in e-assessment: a closer look at educational suppo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  173. Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  174. Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  175. Cultivating Self-Regulation for Students With Mild Disabilities...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  176. Open Badges: Challenges and Opportunities
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  177. Epistemological Beliefs and Students’ Adaptive Perception of Task Comp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  178. The role of a novel formative assessment tool (Stats-mIQ) and individu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  179. Academic Effort and Achievement in Science: Beyond a Gendered Relation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  180. Training of self-regulated learning skills on a social network system
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  181. Considering class-based values related to guardian involvement and the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  182. Response to Vassallo's claims from a historically situated view of sel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  183. Why should I prepare? a mixed method study exploring the motives of me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  184. Toward a Conceptual Model of Mentoring Research: Integration with Self...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  185. Patterns in elementary school students′ strategic actions in varying l...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  186. Personalised learning: lessons to be learnt
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  187. Analysis of Task Commitment Types of Science Learning in High School S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  188. Development of An Inventory to Classify Task Commitment Type in Scienc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  189. Shallow strategy development in a teachable agent environment designed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  190. Ambient e-Learning: a metacognitive approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  191. Changing models for researching pedagogy with information and communic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  192. Analyzing Navigation Patterns to Scaffold Metacognition in Hypertext S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  193. nStudy: Tracing and Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in the Internet
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  194. Using Trace Data to Examine the Complex Roles of Cognitive, Metacognit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  195. Fostering Self-Regulated Learning: An Introduction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  196. When Students Take Control: Investigating the Impact of the CREST Inqu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  197. Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  198. Observations of a Working Class Family: Implications for Self-Regulate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  199. Investigating how college students’ task definitions and plans relate ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  200. Self‐Regulation and Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  201. Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  202. General knowledge monitoring as a predictor of in‐class exam performan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  203. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieva...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  204. Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  205. Differently structured advance organizers lead to different initial sc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  206. Effects of a collaborative annotation method on students’ learning and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  207. Exploring counter-theoretical instances of graduate learners’ self-reg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  208. A Self-regulated Learning Perspective on Student Engagement
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  209. Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philos...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  210. An integrated approach to self-regulated learning platform enhanced wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  211. Self-regulated learning, students' understanding and performance in en...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  212. Making the most of teaching at the chairside
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  213. Implications of Institutionalizing Self-Regulated Learning: An Analysi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  214. Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  215. Teacher Feedback in Formative Classroom Assessment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  216. Self-Regulated Learning and the Allocation of Study Time
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  217. Nonlinear technology: Changing the conception of extrinsic motivation?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  218. Online learning in dentistry: an overview of the future direction for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  219. Exploring relations among college students’ prior knowledge, implicit ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  220. The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Wit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  221. Measuring Cognitive and Metacognitive Regulatory Processes During Hype...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  222. Measuring Self-Regulation in Computer-Based Learning Environments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  223. Self-Regulated Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  224. Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: a functio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  225. ‘Your thrust is to understand’ – how academically successful students ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  226. Aging and cognitive performance: Challenges and implications for physi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  227. Computer Use in a Primary School: A Case-Study of Self-Regulated Learn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  228. Formative Assessment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  229. Effects of self-assessment scripts on self-regulation and learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  230. Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of und...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  231. Formative Assessment Issues Across the Curriculum: The Theory and the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  232. Junior Secondary Students' Perceptions of Influences on Their Engageme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  233. Instructional Conferencing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  234. Student conscientiousness, self‐regulated learning, and science achiev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  235. Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  236. Developing the theory of formative assessment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  237. A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acq...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  238. Why This and Why Now? Introduction to the Special Issue on Metacogniti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  239. Making a mark – taking assessment to technology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  240. Promoting Academic Motivation and Self-Regulation: Practical Guideline...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  241. Development and Initial Validation of the Online Learning Value and Se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  242. Article de recherche théorique et article de recherche empirique : par...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  243. The effect of a human agent’s external regulation upon college student...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  244. Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

AERA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

AERA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text