Learning Progression–Based Assessments: A Systematic Review of Student and Teacher Uses
Abstract
This systematic review examined evidence of the utility of learning progression (LP)–based assessments to inform teaching and student learning in classroom contexts. Fifty-nine studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed against four research questions. Evidence highlighted their potential for supporting judgments about learning, informing instructional and learning decisions, and improving teacher learning and development. Although 23 studies measured student achievement, reporting positive overall effects, only 6 adopted the experimental designs necessary for causal claims. Using LP-based assessment for formative purposes was well supported. Limited evidence was found regarding summative and accountability uses. Findings show that LP-based assessment design and use requires trade-offs relating to standardization and scale. Teachers need opportunities for negotiation when making judgments and integrating LP-based assessments into existing curriculum and policy contexts. Future research should examine student use of LP assessments and find a balance between standardization and customization to meet the needs of diverse learners and local contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the review.
Adams R. J., Jackson J., Turner R. (2018). Learning progressions as an inclusive solution to global education monitoring. https://research.acer.edu.au/monitoring_learning/32
Alexander P. A. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352
Alonzo A. C. (2018). An argument for formative assessment with science learning progressions. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408630
*Alonzo A. C., Elby A. (2019). Beyond empirical adequacy: Learning progressions as models and their value for teachers. Cognition and Instruction, 37(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1539735
*Anderson C. W., de los Santos E. X., Bodbyl S., Covitt B. A., Edwards K. D., Hancock J. B. II, Lin Q., Morrison Thomas C., Penuel W. R., Welch M. M. (2018). Designing educational systems to support enactment of the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1026–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21484
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2018). Introduction to the national literacy and numeracy learning progressions. ACARA. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/national-literacy-and-numeracy-learning-progressions/
*Bailey A. L., Heritage M. (2014). The role of language learning progressions in improved instruction and assessment of English language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.176
*Bailey A. L., Heritage M. (2017). Imperatives for teacher education: Findings from studies of effective teaching for English language learners. In Peters M. A., Cowie B., Menter I. (Eds.), A Companion to Research in Teacher Education (pp. 697–712). Springer.
Bakker A., Cai J., English L., Kaiser G., Mesa V., Van Dooren W. (2019). Beyond small, medium, or large: Points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4
Battista M. T. (2011). Conceptualizations and issues related to learning progressions, learning trajectories, and levels of sophistication. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 507–570. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1228
Black P., Wilson M., Yao S.Y. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9(2–3), 71–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2011.591654
*Bojorque G., Torbeyns J., Van Hoof J., Van Nijlen D., Verschaffel L. (2018). Effectiveness of the Building Blocks program for enhancing Ecuadorian kindergartners’ numerical competencies. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 44(3rd quarter), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.12.009
Briggs D. C., Alonzo A. C., Schwab C., Wilson M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_2
*Briggs D. C., Diaz-Bilello E., Peck F., Alzen J., Chattergoon R., Johnson R. (2015). Using a learning progression framework to assess and evaluate student growth. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED561889
*Briggs D. C., Diaz-Bilello E., Peck F., Alzen J., Chattergoon R., McClelland A. (2014). Learning progressions project: Documentation of pilot work and lessons learned in the 2013-2014 school year. https://www.colorado.edu/education/sites/default/files/attached-files/CADRE%20LP%20Project%20Y1%20Full%20Report_2014.pdf
Briggs D. C., Furtak E. M. (2019). Learning progressions and embedded assessment. In Brookhart S., McMillan J. (Eds.), Classroom assessment and educational measurement (pp. 146–169). Routledge.
Chen F., Zhang S., Guo Y., Xin T. (2017). Applying the Rule Space Model to develop a learning progression for thermochemistry. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1357–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9553-7
Clements D. H., Banse H., Sarama J., Tatsuoka C., Joswick C., Hudyma A., Van Dine D. W., Tatsuoka K. K. (2020). Young children’s actions on length measurement tasks: strategies and cognitive attributes. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1843231
Clements D. H., Sarama J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034954
Clements D. H., Sarama J., Van Dine D. W., Barrett J. E., Cullen C. J., Hudyma A., Dolgin R., Cullen A. L., Eames C. L. (2018). Evaluation of three interventions teaching area measurement as spatial structuring to young children. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.12.004
*Clements D. H., Sarama J., Wolfe C. B., Spitler M. E. (2013). Longitudinal evaluation of a scale-up model for teaching mathematics with trajectories and technologies: Persistence of effects in the third year. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 812–850. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212469270
Confrey J. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030: Curriculum analysis – A synthesis of research on learning trajectories/progressions in mathematics. OECD Directorate for Education and Skills, Education Policy Committee.
*Confrey J., Gianopulos G., McGowan W., Shah M., Belcher M. (2017). Scaffolding learner-centered curricular coherence using learning maps and diagnostic assessments designed around mathematics learning trajectories. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(5), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0869-1
*Confrey J., Maloney A. P., Belcher M., McGowan W., Hennessey M., Shah M. (2018). The concept of an agile curriculum as applied to a middle school mathematics digital learning system (DLS). International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.017%20
*Confrey J., McGowan W., Shah M., Belcher M., Hennessey M., Maloney A. (2019). Using digital diagnostic classroom assessments based on learning trajectories to drive instruction. In Siemon D., Barkatsas A., Seah R. (Eds.). Researching and using progressions (trajectories) in mathematics education (pp. 75–100). Brill Sense.
*Confrey J., Shah M. (2021). Examining instructional change at scale using data from diagnostic assessments built on learning trajectories. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1265–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01259-w
*Confrey J., Toutkoushian E., Shah M. (2019). A validation argument from soup to nuts: Assessing progress on learning trajectories for middle-school mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2018.1544135%20
Connor C. M., Mazzocco M. M. M., Kurz T., Crowe E. C., Tighe E. L., Wood T. S., Morrison F. J. (2018). Using assessment to individualize early mathematics instruction. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.005
Corcoran T. B., Mosher F. A., Rogat A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE). https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/53/
*Covitt B. A., Gunckel K. L., Caplan B., Syswerda S. (2018). Teachers’ use of learning progression-based formative assessment in water instruction. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408627
Dumas D., McNeish D., Sarama J., Clements D. (2019). Preschool mathematics intervention can significantly improve student learning trajectories through elementary school. AERA Open, 5(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419879446
Duncan R. G., Hmelo-Silver C. E. (2009). Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 606–609.
Duncan R. G., Rivet A. E. (2018). Learning progressions. In Fischer F., Hmelo-Silver C. E., Goldman S. R., Reimann P. (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 422–432). Routledge.
Duschl R., Maeng S., Sezen A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
*Ebby C. B. (2018). Using a learning trajectory to make sense of student work for instruction. In Barnes N., Fives H. (Eds.), Cases of teachers’ data use (pp. 44–62). Routledge.
*Ebby C. B., Remillard J., D’Olier J. H. (2019). Pathways for analyzing and responding to student work for formative assessment: The role of teachers’ goals for student learning. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_workingpapers/22/
*Ebby C. B., Sirinides P. M. (2015). Conceptualizing teachers’ capacity for learning trajectory-oriented formative assessment in mathematics. In Middleton J. A., Cai J., Hwang S. (Eds.), Large-scale studies in mathematics education (pp. 159–176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07716-1_8
*Edgington C. (2014). Teachers’ uses of a learning trajectory as a tool for mathematics lesson planning. In Lo J.J., Leatham K. R., Van Zoest L. R. (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 261–284). Springer.
*Edgington C., Wilson P. H., Sztajn P, Webb J. (2016). Translating learning trajectories into useable tools for teachers. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.5.1.0065
Education Scotland. (2020). National Numeracy and Mathematics Progression Framework (NNMPF). https://education.gov.scot/improvement/research/national-numeracy-and-mathematics-progression-framework-nnmpf/
Education Services Australia. (2021). Online formative assessment initiative. https://www.ofai.edu.au/
*Furtak E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181–1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21054
*Furtak E. M., Bakeman R., Buell J. Y. (2018). Developing knowledge-in-action with a learning progression: Sequential analysis of teachers’ questions and responses to student ideas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.001
*Furtak E. M., Circi R., Heredia S. C. (2018). Exploring alignment among learning progressions, teacher-designed formative assessment tasks, and student growth: Results of a four-year study. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408624
*Furtak E. M., Heredia S. C. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 982–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21156
*Furtak E. M., Kiemer K., Circi R. K., Swanson R., de Leon V., Morrison D., Heredia S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: Findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44(3), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3
*Furtak E. M., Morrison D., Kroog H. (2014). Investigating the link between learning progressions and classroom assessment. Science Education, 98(4), 640–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21122
*Furtak E. M., Tayne K. (2019). Affordances and constraints of learning progression designs in supporting formative assessment. In McLoughlin E., Finlayson O. E., Erduran S., Childs P. E. (Eds.), Bridging research and practice in science education: Selected papers from the ESERA 2017 conference (pp. 241–256). Springer.
Gonski D., Arcus T., Boston K., Gould V., Johnson W., O’Brien L., Perry L.-A., Roberts M. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Australian Government. https://docs.education.gov.au/node/50516
*Goral D. P., Bailey A. L. (2019). Student self-assessment of oral explanations: Use of language learning progressions. Language Testing, 36(3), 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219826330
Gotwals A. W. (2012). Learning progressions for multiple purposes: Challenges in using learning progressions. In Alonzo A., Gotwals A. (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 461–472). Brill Sense.
Gotwals A. W., Anderson C. W. (2015). Learning progressions. In Gunstone R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 596–601). Springer.
Gotwals A. W., Songer N. B. (2010). Reasoning up and down a food chain: Using an assessment framework to investigate students’ middle knowledge. Science Education, 94(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20368
Gotwals A. W., Songer N. B. (2013). Validity evidence for learning progression-based assessment items that fuse core disciplinary ideas and science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 597–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21083
*Gunckel K. L., Covitt B. A., Salinas I. (2018). Learning progressions as tools for supporting teacher content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge about water in environmental systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1339–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21454
Hayward L., Jones D. E., Waters J., Makara K., Morrison-Love D., Spencer E., Barnes J., Davies H., Hughes S., Nelson S., Ryder N., Stacey D., Wallis R., Baxter J., Macbride G., Bendall R., Brooks S., Cooze A., Wardle G. (2018). Learning about progression: Informing thinking about a curriculum for Wales. http://athrofa.cymru/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/CAMAU-Learning-about-Progression-Research-Report-2018-21.06.pdf
*Heredia S. C. (2020). Exploring the role of coherence in science teachers’ sensemaking of science-specific formative assessment in professional development. Science Education, 104, 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21561
Heritage M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).
Huynh N. T., Solem M., Bednarz S. W. (2015). A road map for learning progressions research in geography. Journal of Geography, 114(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.935799
Jescovitch L. N., Scott E. E., Cerchiara J. A., Merrill J., Urban-Lurain M., Doherty J. H., Haudek K. C. (2021). Comparison of machine learning performance using analytic and holistic coding approaches across constructed response assessments aligned to a science learning progression. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09858-0
*Jin H., Johnson M. E., Shin H. J., Anderson C. W. (2017). Promoting student progressions in science classrooms: A video study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(7), 852–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21388
Jin H., Mikeska J. N., Hokayem H., Mavronikolas E. (2019). Toward coherence in curriculum, instruction, and assessment: A review of learning progression literature. Science Education, 103(5), 1206–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21525
*Jin H., Shin H., Johnson M. E., Kim J., Anderson C. W. (2015). Developing learning progression-based teacher knowledge measures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(9), 1269–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21243
*Jin H., Zhan L., Anderson C. W. (2013). Developing a fine-grained learning progression framework for carbon-transforming processes. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1663–1697. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.782453
*Kang H., Furtak E.M. (2021). Learning theory, classroom assessment, and equity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(3), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12423
*Kannan P., Bryant A. D., Shao S., Wylie E. C. (2021). Identifying teachers’ needs for results from interim unit assessments (Research Report No. RR-21-08). ETS. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12320
*Kobrin J. L. (2016). Learning progressions in action in a middle school: A case study. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.963885
Kraft M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798
Lai E. R., Kobrin J. L., DiCerbo K. E., Holland L. R. (2017). Tracing the assessment triangle with learning progression-aligned assessments in mathematics. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 15(3–4), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2017.1388113
*Lehrer R., Kim M.-J., Ayers E., Wilson M. (2014). Toward establishing a learning progression to support the development of statistical reasoning. In Maloney A. P., Confrey J., Nguyen K. H. (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education (pp. 31–59). Information Age Publishing.
Lehrer R., Schauble L. (2009). Images of learning, images of progress. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 731–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20317
Lobato J., Walters C. D. (2017). A taxonomy of approaches to learning trajectories and progressions. In Cai J. (Eds.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 74–101).
Masters G., Forster M. (1996). Developmental assessment: Assessment resource kit. ACER.
Masters G. N. (2013). Reforming educational assessment: Imperatives, principles, and challenges. ACER. https://research.acer.edu.au/aer/12/
*Metz K. E., Cardace A., Berson E., Ly U., Wong N., Sisk-Hilton S., Metz E., Wilson M. (2019). Primary grade children’s capacity to understand microevolution: The power of leveraging their fruitful intuitions and engagement in scientific practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 556–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1667806
Ministry of Education. (2018). The literacy learning progressions: Meeting the reading and writing demands of the curriculum. Learning Media Limited. https://literacyprogressions.tki.org.nz/
Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11625
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290.
Osborne J. F., Henderson J. B., MacPherson A., Szu E., Wild A., Yao S.-Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21316
*Panorkou N., Kobrin J. L. (2017). Enhancing teachers’ formative assessment practices through learning trajectory-based professional development. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(2), 178–201. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.5.2.0178
*Parr J. (2011). Repertoires to scaffold teacher learning and practice in assessment of writing. Assessing Writing, 16(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.11.002
*Peck F., Johnson R., Briggs D., Alzen J. (2021). Toward learning trajectory-based instruction: A framework of conceptions of learning and assessment. School Science and Mathematics, 121, 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12489
Pellegrino J. W., DiBello L. V., Goldman S. R. (2016). A framework for conceptualizing and evaluating the validity of instructionally relevant assessments. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1145550
Pigott T. D., Polanin J. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
Plummer J. D., Palma C., Rubin K., Flarend A., Ong Y. S., Ghent C., Furman T. (2020). Evaluating a learning progression for the solar system: Progress along gravity and dynamical properties dimensions. Science Education, 104(3), 530–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21567
Sandelowski M., Barroso J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer.
*Sarama J., Clements D. H., Wolfe C. B., Spitler M. E. (2012). Longitudinal evaluation of a scale-up model for teaching mathematics with trajectories and technologies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(2), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2011.627980
*Schramm J. W., Jin H., Keeling E. G., Johnson M., Shin H. J. (2018). Improved student reasoning about carbon-transforming processes through inquiry-based learning activities derived from an empirically validated learning progression. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 887–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9584-0
Shepard L. A. (2018). Learning progressions as tools for assessment and learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408628
Shepard L. A., Penuel W. R., Pellegrino J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12189
Shepard L., Daro P., Stancavage F. B. (2013). The relevance of learning progressions for NAEP. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED545240.pdf
*Siemon D. (2019). Knowing and building on what students know: The case of multiplicative thinking. In Siemon D., Barkatsas T., Seah R. (Eds.), Researching and using progressions (trajectories) in mathematics education (pp. 6–31). Brill Sense.
*Siemon D., Banks N., Prasad S. (2019). Multiplicative thinking: A necessary STEM foundation. In Barkatsas T., Carr N., Cooper G. (Eds.), STEM education: An emerging field of inquiry (pp. 74–100). Brill Sense.
Simon M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.2.0114
Simpson A. (2020). On the misinterpretation of effect size. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09924-4
Smith C. L., Wiser M., Anderson C. W., Krajcik J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 4(1–2), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2006.9678570
*Song Y., Sparks J. R. (2019). Building a game-enhanced formative assessment to gather evidence about middle school students’ argumentation skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1175–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9637-3
*Songer N. B., Gotwals A. W. (2012). Guiding explanation construction by children at the entry points of learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20454
*Songer N. B., Kelcey B., Gotwals A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 610–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20313
Stains M., Escriu-Sune M., Molina Alvarez de Santizo M. L., Sevian H. (2011). Assessing secondary and college students’ implicit assumptions about the particulate nature of matter: Development and validation of the structure and motion of matter survey. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(10), 1359–1365. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1002509
Steedle J. T., Shavelson R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20308
*Stille S. V. V., Jang E., Wagner M. (2016). Building teachers’ assessment capacity for supporting English language learners through the implementation of the STEP Language Assessment in Ontario K-12 schools. TESL Canada Journal, 32, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v32i0.1215
*Suh J., Seshaiyer P. (2015). Examining teachers’ understanding of the mathematical learning progression through vertical articulation during Lesson Study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(3), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9282-7
*Supovitz J. A., Ebby C. B., Remillard J., Nathenson R. A. (2018). Experimental impacts of the ongoing assessment project on teachers and students. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/107/
Sztajn P., Confrey J., Wilson P. H., Edgington C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12442801
Testa I., Capasso G., Colantonio A., Galano S., Marzoli I., Zappia A. (2019). Development and validation of a university students’ progression in learning quantum mechanics through exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 388–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1556414
*van Rijn P., Graf E. A., Arieli-Attali M., Song Y. (2018). Agreement of teachers on evaluating assessments of learning progressions in English language arts and mathematics. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12199
*Wickstrom M. H., Langrall C. W. (2020). The case of Mrs. Purl: Using a learning trajectory as a tool for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(1), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9412-8
*Wilmot D. B., Schoenfeld A., Wilson M., Champney D., Zahner W. (2011). Validating a learning progression in mathematical functions for college readiness. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 13(4), 259–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.60834
Wilson M. (2018). Making measurement important for education: The crucial role of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12188
*Wilson M., Lehrer R. (2021). Improving learning: Using a learning progression to coordinate instruction and assessment. Frontiers in Education, 6(135), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.654212
Wilson M., Sloane K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1302_4
*Wilson P. H. (2014). Learning trajectories and professional development. In Maloney A. P., Confrey J., Nguyen K. H. (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education. (pp. 227–242). Information Age Publishing.
*Wilson P. H., Mojica G. F., Confrey J. (2013). Learning trajectories in teacher education: Supporting teachers’ understandings of students’ mathematical thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.003
*Wilson P. H., Sztajn P., Edgington C., Myers M. (2015). Teachers’ uses of a learning trajectory in student-centered instructional practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115574104
Wylie C., Bauer M., Bailey A. L., Heritage M. (2018). Formative assessment of mathematics and language: Applying companion learning progressions to reveal greater insights to teachers. In Bailey A., Maher C., Wilkinson L. (Eds.), Language, literacy, and learning in the STEM disciplines (pp. 143–168). Routledge.
Wylie E. C. (2017). Winsight™ assessment system: Preliminary theory of action. ETS Research Report Series, 2017(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12155
Xu Y., Brown G. T. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
*Yin Y., Tomita M. K., Shavelson R. J. (2014). Using formal embedded formative assessments aligned with a short-term learning progression to promote conceptual change and achievement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.787556
*Zhai X., Li M., Guo Y. (2018). Teachers’ use of learning progression-based formative assessment to inform teachers’ instructional adjustment: A case study of two physics teachers’ instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1832–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1512772
Biographies
LOIS RUTH HARRIS is a senior research fellow at the Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, Australian Catholic University. Her research examines primary, secondary, and tertiary educational contexts, with a focus on classroom assessment, feedback, self-assessment, equity, and student engagement.
LENORE ADIE is associate professor in teacher education and assessment and senior research fellow at the Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, ACU. Her research focuses on assessment processes, as these contribute to supporting teachers’ pedagogical practices and student learning across all phases of education.
CLAIRE WYATT-SMITH is director of the Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, ACU, and professor of educational assessment and literacy. Her research engages with significant research, policy, and practice matters including standards, judgment, and moderation in schooling systems and teacher education. Her most recent work focuses on the use of data in evidentiary decision-making, professional judgment, and expertise.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: March 18, 2022
Issue published: December 2022
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Review of Educational Research.
View All Journal MetricsArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 3024
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
There are no citing articles to show.
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
AERA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
AERA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
