Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1997

Field Analysis of Operation and Design of Single-Point Urban Interchanges

Abstract

Michigan is considering the much needed rehabilitation and upgrading of many of the freeway interchanges located in urban environments. The single-point urban interchange (SPUI) has been suggested as an alternative to designs presently used, in particular the Michigan urban diamond interchange. To evaluate the appropriateness of the SPUI, a literature review was conducted, along with an e-mail and telephone survey of other state departments of transportation experience with the SPUI. Then, a field review of selected SPUIs was conducted to collect observations about the geometric design, signal operation, pedestrian control, pavement markings, and land use and landscaping of SPUIs. A SPUI with the crossroad going over the freeway was found to be a preferred design. In addition, the smaller designs were observed to function the best. However, the use of continuous frontage roads is believed to counteract the advantages of the design. Currently, progression of the crossroad is not a problem, although the impact of the SPUI on intersections downstream must be considered. Additionally, the need for pavement markings in large SPUIs is paramount. However, these pavement markings overlap and cause driver confusion. Several other observations were also made: most SPUIs reviewed were not able to adequately provide for pedestrians, controlled access near the SPUI is suggested, and landscaping dramatically increases the aesthetics of the interchange. The SPUI is a good design and has a place. However, some of the newer and enhanced designs with the resulting increase in size may be counterproductive.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bonneson J. A., and Messer C. J. A National Survey of Single-Point Urban Interchanges. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1989.
2. Messer C. J., and Bonneson J. A. NCHRP Report 345: Single Point Urban Interchange Design and Operations Analysis. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989.
3. Fowler B. C. An Operational Comparison of the Single-Point Urban and Tight-Diamond Interchanges. ITE Journal, April 1993.
4. Leisch J. P., Urbanik T., and Oxley J. P. A Comparison of Two Diamond Interchange Forms in Urban Areas. ITE Journal, May, 1989.
5. Abbey L., and Thurgood G. S. Design and Operational Features of the Single Point Urban Interchange. Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, June 1991.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1997
Issue published: January 1997

Rights and permissions

© 1997 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Paul W. Dorothy
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, A349 Engineering Building, East Lansing, Mich. 48824
Thomas L. Maleck
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, A349 Engineering Building, East Lansing, Mich. 48824
Laura Aylsworth-Bonzelet
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, A349 Engineering Building, East Lansing, Mich. 48824

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 8

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub