Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1997

Enhanced Technology Transfer Through Strategic Planning, Partnering, and Model Integration

Abstract

A new approach to technology transfer (T2) under way at the Pennsylvania Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) is presented. The approach arose from a need to increase T2 efficiency and effectiveness. The model and processes draw from functional theories and methods within the areas of business, education, evaluation, and organization. T2 is a dynamic and complex process often treated and associated with the more concrete disciplines of training and education. Until recently, little existed to conceptualize and apply a systematized deployment and assessment of T2 intended for infrastructure improvement in transportation. The processes and models presented offer creative responses to pertinent issues in this area. Strategic planning principles based on Bryson’s model for public and nonprofit organizations, coupled with network-based decision-making software used by the Pennsylvania LTAP center, are described. Strategic objectives common to other key organizations were identified to arrive at a partnering scheme that penetrates three organizational functions: strategic operations, product/service development, and implementation/marketing. Central to this partnering scheme is a new T2 integration model. This customer-driven model provides a framework for integrating strategic objectives among partners, a basis for guiding shared research and development activities, a systematic and economic approach to T2, and a methodology for evaluating T2 effects. Critical issues in transportation T2 are addressed, and proactive responses and practical steps now under way in Pennsylvania are offered.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bryson J. M. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. Revised edition. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1995.
2. Ventana Group Systems for Windows. Ventana Corp., Tucson, Ariz., 1995.
3. Loveless W. (ed.). New Ocean-Partnerships Bill Enjoys Rare Wave of Support. Federal Technology Report, April 25, 1996.
4. Technology Transfer Under the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act: The Second Biennial Report. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1993.
5. Effective partnering: A Report to Congress on Federal Technology Partnerships (preview copy). Office of Technology Policy, U.S. Department of Commerce, Feb. 1996.
6. Bell Associates, Inc. Marketing Services in Support of Effective Technology Transfer to Federal Highway Administration Customers. Contract DTFH61-93-Z-00024. Office of Technology Application, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.
7. Anderson J. A. Linking Marketing and Technology Transfer in Transportation. Presented at 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1995.
8. Zeitz R. A. A New Era in FHWA Leadership. Public Roads, Autumn 1993.
9. Willey T. F. The Value of University Technology Transfer and Licensing. Presented at Technology Transfer: How Do We Know What Works? A Working Conference on Measurement and Evaluation, Technology Transfer Society and Engineering Foundation, Santa Fe, N.M., April–May 1996.
10. Feller I., and Roessner D. What Does Industry Expect from University Partnerships? Issues in Science and Technology, Fall 1995, pp. 80–84.
11. Geisler E. Why Federal Laboratories Succeed or Fail at Technology Commercialization. College of Business, University of Wisconsin, Whitewater, 1995.
12. Bozeman B., and Coker K. Assessing the Effectiveness of Technology Transfer from U.S. Government R&D Laboratories: The Impact of Market Orientation. Technovation, May 1992, pp. 239–256.
13. Performance Assessment at the National Science Foundation: Proposals for NSF’s Response to the Government Performance and Results Act. Office of Policy Support, National Science Foundation, 1995.
14. Lindsay E. A. ACCREDIT (Analytical Computation of Communications Reach Emphasis by Delineating Influence Targets): A Method for Developing Communications Budgets Through Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. PDL Institute, Chicago, Ill., 1966.
15. Tornatzky L. G. Through the Underbrush: The Intersection of Politics and Methodology. Presented at Technology Transfer: How Do We know What Works? A Working Conference on Measurement and Evaluation, Technology Transfer Society and Engineering Foundation, Santa Fe, N.M., April–May 1996.
16. Bozeman B., and Melkers J. (eds.). Assessing R&D Impacts: Method and Practice. Kluwer Publishers, 1993.
17. Carr R. K. Measurement and Evaluation of Federal Technology Transfer. Technology Transfer Society Proceedings, 20th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 221–230.
18. Setting Priorities and Measuring Results at NIST. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Md.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1997
Issue published: January 1997

Rights and permissions

© 1997 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John A. Anderson
The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, Research Office Building, University Park, Pa. 16802
Walter P. Kilareski
The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, Research Office Building, University Park, Pa. 16802
Charles H. Goodspeed
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of New Hampshire, Durham, N.H. 03824

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 7

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub