Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1997

Transitional Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Model

Abstract

The Transitional Alternative Fuels Vehicle model simulates the use and cost of alternative fuels and alternative fuel vehicles over the period 1996 to 2010. It is designed to examine the transitional period of alternative fuel and vehicle use. It accounts for dynamic linkages between investments and vehicle and fuel production capacity, tracks vehicle stock evolution, and represents the effects of increasing scale and expanding retail fuel availability on the effective costs to consumers. Fuel and vehicle prices and choices are endogenous. Preliminary results that illustrate the role of potentially important transitional phenomena are discussed. This model extends previous, long-run comparative static analyses of policies that assumed mature vehicle and fuel industries. As a dynamic transitional model, it can help to assess what may be necessary to reach mature, large-scale, alternative fuel and vehicle markets, and what it would cost.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Assessment of the Costs and Benefits of Flexible and Alternative Fuel Use in the U.S. Transportation Sector: Technical Report Fourteen, Market Potential and Impacts of Alternative Fuel Use in Light-Duty Vehicles: A 2000/2010 Analysis. Office of Policy and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1996.
2. Leiby P. N. A Methodology for Assessing the Market Benefits of Alternative Motor Fuels. Report ORNL-6771. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., Sept. 1993.
3. Rubin J. Fuel Emission Standards and Cost-Effective Use of Alternative Fuels in California. In Transportation Research Record 1444, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 28–35.
4. Fulton L. M. Alternative-Fuel Vehicles and the Energy Policy Act: A Case Study in Technology Policy. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, 1994.
5. Small K. A., and Rosen H. S. Applied Welfare Economics With Discrete Choice Models. Econometrica, Vol. 49, No. 1, Jan. 1981, pp. 105–130.
6. Anderson S. P., de Palma A., and Thisse J. F. A Representative Consumer Theory of the Logit Model. International Economic Review, Aug. 1988, pp. 461–466.
7. Leiby P. N., and Greene D. L. Including Sharing Functions in an Optimization Framework for Market Equilibrium, The Multinomial Logit Case. Draft report. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., April 1995.
8. Brooke A., Kendrick D., and Meeraus A. Release 2.25, GAMS, A User’s Guide. Scientific Press, San Francisco, 1992.
9. Greene D. L. Transition Alternative Fuel Vehicle Model Conditional Fuel and Vehicle Choice (CFVC) Model. Draft working paper. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., May 1995.
10. Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. Specification of a Vehicle Supply Model for TAFVM. Prepared for Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Oak Ridge, Tenn., Sept. 1995.
11. Methodology for Alternative Fuels Retailing Within the Transition Model. Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc., Arlington, Va., 1995.
12. A Supplement to Methodology for Alternative Fuels Retailing Within the Transition Model. Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc., Arlington, Va., 1995.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1997
Issue published: January 1997

Rights and permissions

© 1997 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Paul Leiby
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 4500-N Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 37831-6205
Jonathan Rubin
Department of Economics, Energy Environment and Resources Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn. 37996

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 6

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Simulating a combination of feebates and scrappage incentives to reduc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Understanding the Transition to New Fuels and Vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Effectiveness and Efficiency of Policies to Promote Alternative Fuel V...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. An analysis of alternative fuel credit provisions of US automotive fue...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub