Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1997

Estimating Vehicle Roadside Encroachment Frequencies by Using Accident Prediction Models

Abstract

The existing data to support the development of roadside encroachment-based accident-prediction models are limited and largely outdated. Under FHWA and TRB sponsorship, several roadside safety projects have attempted to address this issue by proposing rather comprehensive data collection plans and conducting pilot data collection efforts. It is clear from these studies that the required cost for the proposed roadside field data-collection efforts will be very high. Furthermore, the validity of any field-collected roadside encroachment data may be questionable because of the technical difficulty of distinguishing intentional (or controlled) from unintentional (or uncontrolled) encroachments. A method to estimate some of the basic roadside encroachment parameters, including vehicle roadside encroachment frequency and the probability distribution of lateral extent of encroachments, using existing accident-based prediction models is proposed. The method is developed by utilizing the probabilistic relationships between a roadside encroachment event and a run-off-the-road accident event. With some assumptions, the method is capable of providing a wide range of basic encroachment parameters from conventional accident-based prediction models. To illustrate the concept and use of such a method, some basic encroachment parameters are estimated for rural two-lane undivided roads. In addition, the estimated encroachment parameters are compared with those estimated from the existing encroachment data. The illustration indicates that this method can be a viable approach to estimating basic encroachment parameters of interest and, thus, has the potential of reducing the roadside data collection cost.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Special Report 214: Designing Safer Roads—Practices for Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987.
2. Traffic Safety Facts 1992, Revised. NHTSA, March 1994.
3. Viner J. G. Harmful Events in Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1993.
4. Ray M. H., Carney J. F. III, and Opiela K. S. Emerging Roadside Safety Issues, TR News 177, March–April 1995.
5. Daily K., Hughes W., and McGee H. Experimental Plans for Accident Studies of Highway Design Elements: Encroachment Accident Study. FHWA, April 1994.
6. Mak K. K., and Sicking D. L. Development of Roadside Safety Data Collection Plan. Technical Report, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 1992.
7. Viner J. G. Rollovers on Sideslopes and Ditches. Accident Analysis and Prevention. Vol. 27, No. 4, 1995, 483–491.
8. Mak K. K., and Bligh R. P. Recovery-Area Distance Relationships for Highway Roadsides. Phase I Report. NCHRP Project G17-11, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, Jan. 1996.
9. Zegeer C. V., Hummer J., Reinfurt D., Herf L., and Hunter W. Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two-Lane Roads, Volumes I and II. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1987.
10. Zegeer C. V., Stewart R., Reinfurt D., Council F., Neuman T., Hamilton E., Miller T., and Hunter W. Cost-Effective Geometric Improvements for Safety Upgrading of Horizontal Curves, Volume I. Final Report. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1990.
11. Maycock G., and Hall R. D. Accidents at 4-Arm Roundabouts. TRRL Report 1120, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, 1984.
12. Miaou S.-P., and Lum H. Modeling Vehicle Accidents and Highway Geometric Design Relationships. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1993, pp. 689–709.
13. Miaou S.-P. The Relationship Between Truck Accidents and Geometric Design of Road Sections: Poisson Versus Negative Binomial Regressions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1994, pp. 471–482.
14. Miaou S.-P., Hu P. S., Wright T., Davis S. C., and Rathi A. K. Development of Relationship Between Truck Accidents and Geometric Design: Phase I. FHWA-RD-91-124, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1993.
15. Miaou S.-P. Measuring the Goodness-of-Fit of Accident Prediction Models. FHWA-RD-96-040, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Dec. 1996, 121 pp.
16. Glennon J. C. NCHRP Report 148: Roadside Safety Improvement Programs for Freeways—A Cost Effectiveness Priority Approach. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974.
17. Rodgman E., Zegeer C., and Hummer J. Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two-Lane Roads. Report FHWA-RD-87-008. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1987.
18. Miaou S.-P., and Lum H. Statistical Evaluation of the Effects of Highway Geometric Design on Truck Accident Involvements. In Transportation Research Record 1407, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 11–23.
19. Hutchinson J. W., and Kennedy T. W. Medians of Divided Highways—Frequency and Nature of Vehicle Encroachments. Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin 487, University of Illinois, Urbana, June 1966.
20. Cooper P. Analysis of Roadside Encroachments—Single Vehicle Run-Off-The-Road Accident Data Analysis for Five Provinces. B.C. Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, March 1980.
21. Roadside Design Guide. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1989.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1997
Issue published: January 1997

Rights and permissions

© 1997 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shaw-Pin Miaou
Center for Transportation Analysis, Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 37831

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 8

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 7

  1. Six Decades of Roadside Encroachment Modeling
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Probability of Roadside Accidents for Curved Sections on Highways
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Predicting Collision Risk between Trucks and Interstate Overpasses
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Evaluation of Truck Impact Hazards for Interstate Overpasses
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Empirical calibration of a roadside hazardousness index for Spanish tw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Impact of roadside features on the frequency and severity of run-off-r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Selection of Roadside Safety Barrier Containment Level According to Eu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub