Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1998

Evaluation of Strain Variation Within a Triaxial Specimen Due to End Effects

Abstract

A new triaxial test setup is described that has been developed to test large specimens (150 mm in diameter and 300 mm long). The system was designed to use eight proximitors: two placed on opposite ends of a diameter at midheight of the specimen to measure lateral deformation and six placed in pairs along the specimen and distributed at 120 degrees around the specimen to measure axial deformations. To calibrate this setup and to cover the typical range for highway base materials, nine elastomer specimens were manufactured with three different stiffnesses. A quasi-static test program was implemented with these specimens to evaluate the capabilities and shortcomings of the system, the repeatability and accuracy of the test results, and the optimization of the gauge length to be used for measuring axial strains in the production test system. An axisymmetric computer model was assembled to predict axial and lateral deformations at the measuring points used in the experimental program. The experimental and numerical results are in fairly good agreement except in the vicinity of the loading end platens. The numerical results indicate overprediction of the moduli by about 15 percent when the gauge length used is the whole length of the specimen instead of the central one-fifth. The experimental data show somewhat higher discrepancies (about 20 percent) for the same range of gauge lengths.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Baldi G., Hight D. W., and Thomas G. E. A Reevaluation of Conventional Triaxial Test Methods. In Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock. ASTM STP 977. Philadelphia, Pa., 1988, pp. 219–263.
2. Scholey G. K., Frost J. D., Lo Presti D. C. F., and Jamiolkowski M. A Review of Instrumentation for Measuring Small Strains During Triaxial Testing of Soil Specimens. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 18, No. 2, June 1995, pp. 137–156.
3. Doebelin E. O. Measurement System Application and Design, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Hightstown, N. J., 1983.
4. Pezo R. Development of a Reliable Modulus Test for Subgrade Materials for Use in Routine Pavement Design. Dissertation. University of Texas, Austin, 1991.
5. Stokoe A., and Kim D. S. Development of Synthetic Specimens for Calibration and Evaluation of Resilient Modulus Equipment. Presented at 69th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1990.
6. Nazarian S., Pezo R., and Picornell M. Testing Methodology of Resilient Modulus of Base Materials. Research Report 6-1336. The Center for Geotechnical and Highway Materials Research, University of Texas, El Paso, 1996.
7. Bishop A. W., and Henkel D. J. The Measurement of Soil Properties in the Triaxial Test. Edward Arnold, London, Great Britain, 1969, p. 29.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1998
Issue published: January 1998

Rights and permissions

© 1998 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rafael Pezo
Center for Highway Materials Research, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968-0516
Miguel Picornell
Center for Highway Materials Research, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968-0516
Soheil Nazarian
Center for Highway Materials Research, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968-0516

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 3

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Mechanical Modeling of Frozen Coarse-Grained Materials Incorporating M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Estimation of Nonlinear Model Parameters for Resilient Modulus of Base...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub