Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1998

Job Accessibility in the San Juan Metropolitan Region: Implications for Rail Transit Benefit Analysis

Abstract

Public transportation investment is made primarily because of its potential social and economic benefits. Properly identifying and measuring these benefits has been the central concern in rail transit investment. The social aspects of the benefits, however, have not been well examined. In this research on the potential benefits of Tren Urbano (a new rail transit system proposed in San Juan, Puerto Rico), accessibility measures are utilized as a key analytical tool. An analysis of Tren Urbano’s effects on employment accessibility in the region is presented. The results show that there is a need for lower-income workers to improve their accessibility to jobs. Tren Urbano will enhance employment accessibility at the regional level and for all income groups as well. The results also reveal spatial inequity in the distribution of the potential benefits, even though the eventual outcome will be dependent on the actual distribution of ridership. Efforts should be made to channel the potential benefits of transportation investment toward socially targeted populations. Integrating the rail system with other transit modes and formulating favorable land use policies are critical to enhance accessibility.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Tren Urbano Transit Project Final Environmental Impact Statement. FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, and Puerto Rico Department of Transportation and Public Works/Highway and Transportation Authority, San Juan, 1995.
2. Beimborn E., Horowitz A., Schuetz J., and Gong Z. Measurement of Transit Benefits. Research Report. Center for Urban Transportation Studies, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, 1993.
3. Lee D. B., and Yujnovsky O. Transportation and Land Use: Research Design for the Analysis of BART Impacts. Working Paper 148 BART 2. University of California at Berkeley, 1971.
4. Al-Mosaind M. A., Dueker K. J., and Strathman J. G. Light-Rail Transit Stations and Property Values: A Hedonic Price Approach. In Transportation Research Record 1400, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 90–94.
5. Bernick M., and Cervero R. Transit-Based Residential Development in the United States: A Review of Recent Experiences. Working Paper 611. University of California at Berkeley, 1994.
6. Cervero R. Rail Transit and Joint Development—Land Market Impacts in Washington, D.C. and Atlanta. Journal of American Planning Association, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1994, pp. 83–94.
7. Knight R. L., and Trygg L. L. Evidence of Land Use Impacts of Rapid Transit Systems. Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1977, pp. 231–247.
8. Nuwirth R. Economic Impacts of Transit on Cities. In Transportation Research Record 1274, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 142–149.
9. Shaw J. Transit-Based Housing and Residential Satisfaction: Review of the Literature and Methodological Approach. In Transportation Research Record 1400, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 82–89.
10. Cervero R. Transit Villages: From Idea to Implementation. Access, Vol. 5, 1994, pp. 8–13.
11. Nelson A. C. Social Benefit of Transit—Case Study of Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. In Transportation Research Record 1576, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 125–131.
12. Kockelman K. M. Travel Behavior as a Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing and Land Use Balance: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Working Paper. University of California at Berkeley, 1997.
13. Ramming M. S. A Consumption-Based Accessibility Index of Transportation and Land Use. MST thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994.
14. Davidson K. B. Accessibility in Transport/Land Use Modeling and Assessment. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 9, 1977, pp. 1401–1416.
15. Paaswell R. E., et al. An Analysis of Rapid Transit Investment—The Buffalo Experience. Final Report. Research Foundation of the State University of New York, 1981.
16. Shen Q. Location Characteristics of Inner-City Neighborhoods and Employment Accessibility of Low-Wage Workers. Environment and Planning B, 1998 (forthcoming).
17. Hanson S. Dimensions of the Urban Transportation Problem. In The Geography of Urban Transportation (Hanson S., ed.). The Guilford Press, New York, 1986.
18. Handy S. Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Implications for Nonwork Travel. In Transportation Research Record 1400, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 58–66.
19. Allen W. B., Liu D., and Singer S. Accessibility Measures of U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Transportation Research B, Vol. 27B, No. 6, 1993, pp. 439–449.
20. Hansen W. G. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 25, 1959, pp. 73–76.
21. Ingram D. R. The Concept of Accessibility: A Search for an Operational Form. Regional Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1971, pp. 101–107.
22. Koenig J. G. Indicators of Urban Accessibility: Theory and Application. Transportation, Vol. 9, 1980, pp. 145–172.
23. Morris J. M., Dumble P. L., and Wigan M. R. Accessibility Indicators for Transportation Planning. Transportation Research A, Vol. 13, 1979, pp. 91–109.
24. Moseley M. J. Accessibility: The Rural Challenge. Cambridge University Press, London, 1979.
25. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. R. Disaggregate Travel and Mobility Choice Models and Measures of Accessibility. In Proc., 3rd International Conference on Behavioral Travel Modeling, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977.
26. Black J., and Conroy M. Accessibility Measures and the Social Evaluation of Urban Structure. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 9, 1977, pp. 1013–1031.
27. Burns L. D. Transportation, Temporal, and Spatial Components of Accessibility. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., 1979.
28. Wachs M., and Kumagai M. G. Physical Accessibility as a Social Indicator. Social Economic Planning Science, Vol. 7, 1973, pp. 437–456.
29. Weibull J. W. An Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Accessibility. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 6, 1976, pp. 357–379.
30. Handy S. L., and Niemeier D. A. Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 29, 1997, pp. 1175–1194.
31. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Regional Transportation Plan—San Juan, Puerto Rico. 1993.
32. Wilson A. G. A Family of Spatial Interaction Models, and Associated Developments. Environment and Planning, Vol. 3, 1971, pp. 1–32.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1998
Issue published: January 1998

Rights and permissions

© 1998 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ming Zhang
Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Qing Shen
Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Joseph Sussman
Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 11

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Formulating a Railway Station Accessibility (RsAI) Model for Station H...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. How will new orbital motorways reshape accessibility in Bratislava met...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Practical Framework for Benchmarking and Impact Evaluation of Public T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Impact of Public Transit on Employment Status...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Strategies To Improve Job Accessibility: Case Study of Tren Urbano in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub