Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1998

Evolving Model for Studying Driver-Vehicle System Performance in Longitudinal Control of Headway

Abstract

A model for studying and evaluating the performance of drivers in controlling headway situations is currently being used to better understand how a driver’s perception of headway range and its rate of change in time (range rate) influence the performance of the driver-vehicle system in freeway driving situations. The model is based upon ideas derived from vehicle dynamics, control theory, and human factors research. It is an interpretive model in the sense that results obtained during real driving are processed to evaluate the parameter values and functional relationships used in the model. In this way, the model evolves as new data and information become available and as calculated results are interpreted and understood.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Fancher P., and Bareket Z. Evaluating Headway Control Using Range Versus Range-Rate Relationships. Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 23, No. 8, 1994, pp. 575–596.
2. Fancher P., et al. Intelligent Cruise Control Field Operational Test. Interim report, UMTRI-97-11, Contract DTNH22-95-H-07428. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
3. Hoffmann E., and Mortimer R. Scaling of Relative Velocity between Vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1996, pp. 415–421.
4. MacAdam C. Application of an Optimal Preview Control for Simulation of Closed-Loop Automobile Driving. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 11, June 1981.
5. Levison W., and Cramer N. Description of the Integrated Driver Model. Report FHWA-RD-94-092. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1995.
6. McRuer D. New Results in Driver Steering Control Models. Human Factors, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1977, pp. 381–397.
7. Fancher P., et al. Fostering Development, Evaluation, and Deployment of Forward Crash Avoidance Systems (FOCAS). UMTRI-95-31, Report DOT-HS-808-437. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1995.
8. Slotine J., and Li W. Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice Hall, N.J., 1991.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1998
Issue published: January 1998

Rights and permissions

© 1998 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Paul S. Fancher
University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2150
Zevi Bareket
University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2150

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 8

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 15

  1. Car-Following Models for Human-Driven Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A critical review on pedestrian crossing behaviour and pedestrian-vehi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Experimental evidence supporting simpler Action Point paradigms for ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Drivers’ engagement level in Adaptive Cruise Control while distracted ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: A review of recen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Longitudinal Control
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Anticipatory speed control model applied to intersection left turns
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Cognitive Cars: A New Frontier for ADAS Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Review of Control Theory Models for Directional and Speed Control
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Driving Behaviour: Models and Challenges
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Modeling Driver Behavior by Using Mind’s Eye Coordinates
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Emergence of a Cognitive Car-Following Driver Model: Application to Re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Behavioural Response: Still a Major Concern for AVCSS?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. The High Mounted Brake Lamp - The 4% Solution
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub