Micromodel for Objective Estimation of Driver Mental Workload from Task Data
Abstract
Observation of driver performance during a 58 000-km (36,000-mile) field study of van pooling indicates that a good estimate of mental workload can be made from an analysis of objective performance data alone. Drivers traversed a mix of rural secondary roads, limited-access expressways, high-density, limited-access urban drives, and downtown city streets on a daily commute from upstate New York to New York City. Data included road characteristics, time, traffic density, speed, weather, brake applications, subsidiary task performance, and subjective difficulty ratings. Driving workload had two components, a steady-state load dictated by road conditions, speed, and traffic density and a transient load determined by the degree of uncertainty in the driving situation. Brake actuations represent the uncertainty inherent in driving while the log2 of the speed is a first approximation of the steady-state information processing load imposed by tracking requirements of vehicle control. Unpredictability of traffic appeared to be the major determinant of perceived difficulty. Workload homeostasis occurred as drivers modified their performance to keep workload within a comfortable range. An objective workload index of the general form, workload = f (brake actuation rate + log2 speed) based on this micromodel of driver behavior predicts subjective driving difficulty. An analysis of variance shows that the workload index distinguished between road types at the p < .0001 level of significance. The workload index correlates at r = .74, 18(df), with the subjective driving degrees of freedom difficulty ratings and at r = .81, 18 df, with the mental workload estimates of the best subsidiary task.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Cooper G., and Harper R. The Use of Pilot Ratings in the Evaluation of Aircraft Handling Qualities. NASA TN-D-5153. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, Calif., 1969.
2. Reid G. B., Shingledecker C., and Eggemeier T. Application of Conjoint Measurement to Workload Scale Development. Proc. Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (Sugarman R., ed.), Santa Monica, 1981.
3. Reid G. B., and Nygren T. E. The Subjective Workload Assessment Technique: A Scaling Procedure for Measuring Mental Workload. In Human Mental Workload (Hancock P. A. and Meshkati N., eds.), (North Holland Press, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 185–213.
4. Hart S. G., and Staveland L. E. Development of a NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Human Mental Workload (Hancock P. A. and Meshkati N., eds.), North Holland Press, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 139–183.
5. Vidulich M. A., and Tsang P. S. Absolute Magnitude Estimation and Relative Judgment Approaches to Subjective Workload Assessment. Proc. Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, 1987, pp. 1057–1061.
6. Zeitlin L. R. Estimates of Mental Workload: A Long-Term Field Trial of Two Subsidiary Tasks. Human Factors, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1995, pp. 611–621.
7. Bahrick H. P., Noble M., and Fitts P. H. Extra Task Performance as a Measure of Learning a Primary Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 4, 1954, pp. 198–203.
8. Brown I. D., and Poulton E. C. Measuring the “Spare Mental Capacity” of Car Drivers by a Subsidiary Task. Ergonomics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1961, pp. 35–40.
9. Brown I. D. Measuring the “Spare Mental Capacity” of Car Drivers by a Subsidiary Auditory Task. Ergonomics, Vol. 5, 1962, pp. 247–250.
10. Brown I. D. The Measurement of Perceptual Load and Reserve Capacity. Transactions of the Association of Industrial Medical Officers, Vol. 14, 1964, pp. 44–49.
11. Mackworth J. Paced Memorizing in a Continuous Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 58, 1959, pp. 206–211.
12. Zeitlin L. R., and Finkelman J. M. A Subsidiary Task Evaluation of the Information processing Load in a Vehicular Simulation. APA Experimental Publication System, Vol. 3, Ms. 106B, 1969.
13. Broadbent D. E. Decision and Stress. Academic Press, New York, 1971.
14. Kahneman D. Attention and Effort. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973.
15. Moray N. Where Is Capacity Limited? A Survey and a Model. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 27, 1967, pp. 84–92.
16. Sanders A. F. Some Remarks on Mental Load. In Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement (Moray N., ed.), Plenum, New York, 1979, pp. 41–77.
17. Badderly A. D. Working Memory. Oxford University Press, New York, 1986.
18. Kantowitz B. H., and Knight J. L. Testing Tapping Time-Sharing: I. Auditory Secondary Task. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 40, 1976, pp. 343–362.
19. Wickens C. D. Processing Resources in Attention. In Varieties of Attention (Parasuraman R. and Davies R., eds.) Academic Press, New York, 1984, pp. 63–101.
20. Johannsen G., Moray N., Pew R., Rasmussen J., Sanders A., and Wickens C. D. Final Report of Experimental Psychology Group. In Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement (Moray N., ed.), Plenum, New York, 1979, pp. 101–114.
21. Moray N. Subjective Mental Workload. Human Factors, Vol. 24, 1982, pp. 25–40.
22. Wierwille W. W., Rahimi M., and Casali G. Evaluation of 16 Measures of Mental Workload Using a Simulated Flight Task Emphasizing Mediational Activity. Human Factors, Vol. 27, 1985, pp. 489–502.
23. Wickens C. D. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Harper Collins, New York, 1992.
24. Solokov E. I., Podachin V. P., and Belova E. V. Emotional Stress and Cardiovascular Response. Mir Publishers, Moscow, 1983.
25. Beatty J. Task-Evoked Pupillary Response, Processing Load, and the Structure of Processing Resources. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 91, 1982, pp. 276–292.
26. Kramer A., Wickens C., and Donchin E. An Analysis of the Processing Requirements of a Complex Perceptual Motor Task. Human Factors, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1983, pp. 597–621.
27. Derrick W. L. Dimensions of Operator Workload. Human Factors, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1988, pp. 95–110.
28. Zeitlin L. R., and Finkelman J. M. Subsidiary Task Techniques of Digit Generation and Digit Recall as Indirect Measures of Operator Loading. Human Factors, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1975, pp. 218–220.
29. Zeitlin L. R., and Finkelman J. M. Comparison of Random Digit Generation and Delayed Digit Recall as Subsidiary Tasks Measures of Operator Loading in Man-Machine Systems. APA Experimental Publication System, Vol. 12, Ms. 458–12, 1971.
30. Tune G. S. A Brief Survey of Variables That Influence Random Digit Generation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 18, 1964, pp. 705–710.
31. Wagenaar W. A. Generation of Random Sequences by Human Subjects: A Critical Survey of Literature. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 77, No. 1, 1972, pp. 65–72.
32. Sheridan T. Mental Workload—What Is It? Why Bother With It? Human Factors Society Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1980, pp. 1–2.
33. Hill S. G., Iavecchia H. P., Byers J. C., Bittner A. C., Zaklad A. L., and Christ R. E. Comparison of Four Subjective Workload Rating Scales. Human Factors, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1992, pp. 429–439.
34. Kantowitz B. K., and Casper P. A. Human Workload in Aviation. In Human Factors in Aviation (Weiner E. I. and Nagel D. C., eds.), Academic Press, San Diego, 1988, pp 157–187.
35. Finkelman J. M., and Glass D. G. Reappraisal of the Relationship Between Noise and Human Performance by Means of a Subsidiary Task Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 54, 1970, pp. 211–213.
36. Finkelman J. M., Zeitlin L. R., Filippi J. A., and Friend M. A. Noise and Driver Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 62, No. 6, 713–718.
37. Shannon E. C., and Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communications. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949.
38. Hick W. E. On the Rate of Gain of Information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 4, 1952, pp. 11–26.
39. Hyman R. Stimulus Information as a Determinant of Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 45, 1952, pp. 423–432.
40. McRuer D. T., and Krendel E. S. The Human Operator as a Servo System Element. Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 267, 1959, pp. 381–403.
41. Licklider J. C. R. Quasilinear Operator Models in the Study of Manual Tracking. In Mathematical Models in Psychology (Luce R. D., ed.), Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., 1960.
42. Elkind J. I., and Sprague L. T. Transmission of Information in Simple Manual Control Systems. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-2. 1961, pp. 58–60.
43. McRuer D. T. Human Dynamics in Man-Machine Systems. Automatica, Vol. 16, 1980, pp. 237–253.
44. Yeh Y.-Y., and Wickens C. D. Dissociation of Performance and Subjective Workload. Human Factors, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1988, pp. 111–120.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published: January 1998
Issue published: January 1998
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 8
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 6
- State of science: mental workload in ergonomics
- Estimating the Driver’s Workload
- A Review of Driver Mental Workload in Driver-Vehicle-Environment Syste...
- Measuring perceived risk: Self-reported and actual hand positions of S...
- An Experiment to Non-Intrusively Collect Physiological Parameters towa...
- Naturalistic observations of driver hand positions
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
