Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1998

Investigation of National Highway System Roadways in the Highway Safety Information System States

Abstract

Motor vehicle crash rates and roadway characteristics for National Highway System (NHS) and non-NHS roads in seven states—California, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Washington— are presented. Accident and roadway data were extracted from the Federal Highway Administration’s Highway Safety Information System. Overall, crash rates on NHS roads were approximately 10 percent lower than those on non-NHS roads, perhaps the result of higher design standards. Crash rates on urban roadways were considerably higher than on the corresponding rural roadways in each state. For rural roadways, fixed-object crash rates were higher on NHS roads than on non-NHS roads. The distribution of crashes by severity was quite similar on NHS and non-NHS roads. For urban freeways, NHS Interstates usually had lower crash rates than NHS non-Interstates. The majority of NHS roads had lane widths of 3.4 m (11 ft) or more, and many had shoulder widths of 1.5 m (5 ft) or more. Compared to NHS non-Interstate roads, NHS Interstate roads were more likely to have lane widths of 3.7 m (12 ft) or over, shoulder widths of 2.4 m (8 ft) or over, paved shoulders, and improved median design. Highway designers and safety officials can use this type of information about accident rates and roadway characteristics to enhance safety by upgrading existing highways and improving the design of NHS highways to some specified roadway design standards and guidelines.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. The National Highway System—Backbone of a National Transportation Network. Public Roads, Winter 1994.
2. McCullagh P., and Nelader J. A. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, 1989.
3. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C., 1996.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1998
Issue published: January 1998

Rights and permissions

© 1998 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Charles V. Zegeer
University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 730, Airport Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3430
Herman F. Huang
University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 730, Airport Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3430
J. Richard Stewart
University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 730, Airport Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3430
Carolyn Williams
University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 730, Airport Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3430

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub