Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1998

Freight Energy Use Disaggregated by Commodity: Comparisons and Discussion

Abstract

The analysis of energy consumption in freight transportation is almost always approached by disaggregating overall energy consumption by mode, which then provides a basis for understanding trends and underlying factors that influence them and for developing conservation policies. Another important approach is to disaggregate by commodity, because it is commodity flows that generate the modal vehicle flows and hence the modal energy consumption in transportation. Thus changes in energy use by commodity are important factors in understanding trends in energy consumption and may provide a basis for energy conservation policies centered on industries using transportation. Total freight energy consumption is estimated for a range of commodity groups using an activitybased approach to energy consumption, where total freight activity is decomposed into components by mode and by commodity group, and then each component is multiplied by an intensity estimate to calculate total energy use for that commodity group. Two important findings are discussed: (a) commodity groups with high energy growth between 1972 and 1993 had a combination of substantial ton-mile growth and modal shift to truck, and (b) commodity groups of finished products with a high average value per ton in general have a much higher average freight energy intensity than raw materials with a low average value per ton.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Commodity Flow Survey 1993: United States Summary. Report TC92-CF-52. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1996.
2. Boge S. The Well-Traveled Yogurt Pot: Lessons for New Freight Transport Policies and Regional Production. World Transport Policy and Practice, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1995, pp. 7–11.
3. Morlok E. K. Individual Vehicle Motion. In Introduction to Transportation Engineering and Planning, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1978.
4. Greene D., and Fan Y. Transportation Energy Intensity Trends: 1972-1992. In Transportation Research Record 1475, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 10–19.
5. Schipper L., Scholl L., and Price L. Energy Use and Carbon Emissions from Freight in 10 Industrialized Countries: An Analysis of Trends from 1973 to 1992. Transportation Research D, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1997, pp. 57–75.
6. Morlok E. K. An Engineering Analysis and Comparison of Railroad and Truck Line-Haul Work (Energy) Requirements. Presented at 55th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1976.
7. Rose A. B., and Reed K. J. Energy Intensity and Related Parameters of Selected Transportation Modes: Freight Movements. Report ORNL-5554. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, 1979.
8. Leilich R. H., et al. Energy and Economic Impacts of Projected Freight Transportation Improvements. Report PB-260000. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company; U.S. Department of Commerce, Nov. 1976.
9. Abacus Technology Corporation. Rail vs. Truck Fuel Efficiency: The Relative Fuel Efficiency of Truck Competitive Rail Freight and Truck Operations Compared in a Range of Corridors. Report DOT/FRA/RRP-91/2. Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991.
10. Mintz M., and Vyas A. Why Is Energy Use Rising in the Freight Sector? In Transportation and Global Climate Change (Greene D. and Santini D., eds.), American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 243–262.
11. Greene D. Transportation and Energy. Eno Foundation, Inc., Washington, D.C., 1996.
12. O'Rourke L., and Lawrence M. Strategies for Goods Movement in a Sustainable Transportation System. In Transportation and Energy: Strategies for a Sustainable Transportation System (Sperling D. and Shaheen S., eds.), American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 1995.
13. Blok P. Prospects for a Shift in Modal Split. In Freight Transport and the Environment, European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Paris, 1991, pp. 129–140.
14. Eisenkopf A. Possibility for a Shift in Modal Split in Favour of Rail and Inland Shipping Traffic. In Freight Transport and the Environment (Kroon M. et al., eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1991, pp. 215–222.
15. Davis S., and McFarlin D. Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 16. Report ORNL-6898. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, 1996.
16. Railroad Facts. American Association of Railroads, Washington, D.C. (annual).
17. Towards a Sustainable Paper Cycle. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, 1996.
18. McKinnon A., and Woodburn A. Logistical Restructuring and Road Freight Traffic Growth. Transportation, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 141–161.
19. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1977 Census of Transportation; Commodity Transportation Survey: Summary. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1981.
20. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1972 Census of Transportation; Commodity Transportation Survey. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1974.
21. Vanek F. M., and Morlok E. K. Improving the Sustainability of Freight Transportation and Logistics by Analyzing the Spatial Pattern of Supply Chains. Proc., 1997 Ecomanagement and Auditing Conference, Manchester, United Kingdom, European Research Press, Shipley, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, 1997.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1998
Issue published: January 1998

Rights and permissions

© 1998 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Francis M. Vanek
Department of Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 293 Towne Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315
Edward K. Morlok
Department of Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 293 Towne Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 14

  1. Freight road transport analysis in the metro São Paulo: Logistical act...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Mode and commodity perspectives on U.S. freight energy consumption and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Construction, Manufacturing, Operati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Shop 'Till We Drop: A Historical and Policy Analysis of Retail Goods M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation effective...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Modal freight transport required for production of US goods and servic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Transportation versus perishability in life cycle energy consumption: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Growth of exports from developing countries: implications for freight ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Analysis of the potential for spatial redistribution of freight using ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The Transportation – Production Tradeoff in the Regional Environmental...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Freight Travel Demand Modeling: Synthesis of Approaches and Developmen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Improving the energy efficiency of freight in the United States throug...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. UK road freight energy use by product: trends and analysis from 1985 t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub