Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1998

Disaggregate Attraction-End Choice Modeling: Formulation and Empirical Analysis

Abstract

For travel demand models to provide good forecasts, they must be causal; that is, the models should represent the travel decisions made by individuals (and households) and should incorporate important demographic and policy-sensitive explanatory variables. This recognition has led to a shift from the aggregate modeling paradigm to the disaggregate modeling paradigm, evident in the widespread use of disaggregate trip production and mode choice models in practice. However, this shift toward disaggregate procedures has not yet influenced the fundamental specification of trip attraction and distribution models employed in practice. Developed and estimated were disaggregate attraction-end choice models that will facilitate the replacement of the aggregate trip attraction and distribution models currently in use. The proposed disaggregate attraction-end choice model is compared with the disaggregate equivalent of the gravity model.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Guensler R. Critical Research Needs in Land Use, Transportation and Air Quality. Transportation Research Circular, Vol. 389, No. 1, 1993.
2. Domencich T. A., and McFadden D. Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1975.
3. Models of Mode and Occupancy Choice in the Shirley Highway Corridor. COMSIS Corp., Silver Spring, Md., 1988.
4. Chang Y. B., and Plager M. Interim Regional Travel Demand Forecasting Model: Development of the 1993 Version. Memorandum, Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization, 1994.
5. McClennen J., Quackenbush K., and Gallagher J. Chronology of FYA Transfer Penalties Research. Memorandum, Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization, 1994.
6. Jones P. M. Destination Choice and Travel Attributes, Determinants of Travel Choice (Hensher D. A. and Dalvi Q., eds.). Saxon House, England, 1978.
7. McFadden D. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location: Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (Karlquist A., Lundquist L., Snickbars F., and Weibull J. W., eds.). North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 75–96.
8. Ben-Akiva M., Gunn G. H., and Silman L. Disaggregate Trip Distribution Models. Proc., Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 1984.
9. Daly A. Estimating Choice Models Containing Attraction Variables. Transportation Research, Vol. 16B, 1982, pp. 5–15.
10. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
11. Govindarajan A. H. Disaggregate Attraction-End Choice Modeling Home-Based Work and Home-Based Shopping Trips. September, 1998.
12. Fotheringham A. S. (1986). Modeling Hierarchical Destination Choice. Environment and Planning, Vol. 18A, pp. 401–418.
13. Department of Employment and Training. Employment Review. State of Massachusetts, 1992.
14. Crime in Massachusetts. Massachusetts State Police Crime Reporting Unit, 1992.
15. Fotheringham A. S. Some Theoretical Aspects of Destination Choice and their Relevance To Production-Constrained Gravity Models. Environment and Planning, Vol. 15A, 1983, pp. 1121–1132.
16. Lo L. Substitutability, spatial structure, and spatial interaction. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 21, 1991, pp. 132–146.
17. Borgers A., and Timmermans H. (1987). A Context-Sensitive Model of Spatial Choice Behavior. Behavioral Modeling in Geography and Planning (Golledge R. and Timmermans H., eds.). Croom Helm, London, 1987.
18. Dubin R. Commuting Patterns and Firm Decentralization. Land Economics, Vol. 67, 1991, pp. 15–29.
19. Hodge D. C. Geography and the Political Economy of Urban Transportation. Urban Geography, Vol. 11, 1990, pp. 87–100.
20. Madden F. J. Why women work closer to home. Urban Studies, Vol. 18, 1981, pp. 181–194.
21. Blumen O. Gender Differences in the Journey to Work. Urban Geography, Vol. 15, 1994, pp. 223–245.
22. Hansen S., and Pratt G. Geographic Perspective on the Occupational Segregation of Women. National Geographic Research, Vol. 6, 1990, pp. 376–378.
23. Bhat C. Travel Demand Modeling Improvements: Disaggregate Destination Choice Modeling. Massachusetts Highway Department, 1995.
24. Windmeijer F. A. G. Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Binary Choice Models. Econometric Reviews, Vol. 14, 1995, pp. 101–116.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1998
Issue published: January 1998

Rights and permissions

© 1998 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chandra Bhat
University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712
Ajay Govindarajan
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
Vamsi Pulugurta
KPMG Peat Marwick, 8200 Greensboro Drive, Suite 400, McLean, VA 22102-3803

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 33

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 49

  1. Comparative Analysis of Discrete Choice Approaches for Modeling Destin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Forecasting the spatial and temporal charging demand of fully electrif...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. On Heterogenous Sampling Rates in Origin–Destination Matrix Estimation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The Importance of Importance Sampling: Exploring Methods of Sampling f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Breaking Out from Food Desert Boundaries: Using Travel Behavior and Lo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Traffic Demand Analysis Model for Land Redevelopment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Accounting for Distance-Based Correlations Among Alternatives in the C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Accessibility of Transit Stops with Multiple Feeder Modes: Walking and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A model of deadheading trips and pick-up locations for ride-hailing se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A two-stage recreational destination choice study incorporating fuzzy ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A random utility maximization (RUM) based measure of accessibility to ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The Times They Are A-Changin’: What Do the Expanding Uses of Travel Ti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Empirical comparison of tour- and trip-based truck travel demand model...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Comparative analysis of traveler destination choice models by method o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Development of destination choice models for pedestrian travel
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Transit trip distribution model considering land use differences betwe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. A Longitudinal Mixed Logit Model for Estimation of Push and Pull Effec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. A utility-based travel impedance measure for public transit network ac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. On allowing a general form for unobserved heterogeneity in the multipl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. A behavioral model of accessibility based on the number of available o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. The Allocation of Ministries in Multiparty Governments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Tradeoffs between in- and out-of-residential neighborhood locations fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Modeling crash frequency and severity with spatiotemporal dependence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Holiday Destination Choice Behavior Analysis Based on AFC Data of Urba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. The location selection problem for the household activity pattern prob...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. A Study of Destination Selection Model Based on Link Flows
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. A comparative study on sampling strategies for truck destination choic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Strategic sampling for large choice sets in estimation and application
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Synthetic Environment to Evaluate Alternative Trip Distribution Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Distribution and Assignment of Compulsory and Discretionary Traffic
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Modeling Destination Choice Behavior Incorporating Spatial Factors, In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Modeling Destination Choice for the Intermediate Stop Trips Included i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Residential self-selection effects in an activity time-use behavior mo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. A comparative study of aggregate and disaggregate gravity models using...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Enhanced Destination Choice Models Incorporating Agglomeration Related...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Commuting time stability: A test of a co-location hypothesis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. GEV-based destination choice models that account for unobserved simila...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Analysis of Stopping Behavior at Urban Signalized Intersections...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on house...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Comprehensive, Unified Framework for Analyzing Spatial Location Choice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Destination choice and the identity of places: A disaggregated analysi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. The influence of retailer reputation on store patronage
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Development and Evaluation of Aggregate Destination Choice Models for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Tobler's First Law and Spatial Analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Numerical Analysis of Effect of Sampling of Alternatives in Discrete C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. The spatial analysis of activity stop generation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Fractional Split-Distribution Model for Statewide Commodity-Flow Analy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. A comprehensive daily activity-travel generation model system for work...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Modeling the Generation and Organization of Household Activity Stops
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub