Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Multiproduct Network Analysis of Freight Land Transport Between Mexico and the United States

Abstract

Truck and rail freight transportation are considered as a first stage in an effort to analyze, by means of network assignment models, freight transportation operations between Mexico and the United States. A set of background information is first presented (i.e., the evolution of trade between Mexico and the United States, participation of rail and truck in this commercial exchange, and modal share between these two modes in such a trade). The assignment model that was developed to predict the freight flows in the truck and rail intermodal network for different product categories (multiproduct) is then described. Finally, values that characterize the operation of the land modes for freight transportation between Mexico and the United States are quantified. Results and analyses that were derived from the model include quantification of ton-kilometers and transportation costs for each product type, as well as assessment of the minimum-cost freight modal share between truck and rail. Some of the analyses presented are by product category (disaggregated), whereas others correspond to the aggregated demand. Most of the analyses reported herein correspond to 1996. The growth trends of the freight volumes between the two countries, together with the optimal share results obtained, are indicative of a conspicuous growth potential for the demand of rail transportation in this type of commercial exchange.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Mexican Commercial Information System (in Spanish). Foreign Trade Statistics Area, Secretariat of Commerce and Industrial Development, Mexico D.F., 1997.
2. Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS). International Codification Forum of the International Cooperation Council, Brussels, Belgium, 1973.
3. Trans-Border Surface Trade Flow Data. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1998.
4. Binational Study of Planning and Programming of Border Transportation. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., and La Empresa, S. de R. L., Mexico D.F., 1996.
5. Mexico–U.S. Import–Export Statistics (in Spanish). Mexican Bank of Foreign Trade, Mexico D.F., 1996.
6. Rico A., Mendoza A., Gutiérrez J. L., and Mayoral E. A Mexican Field Study to Obtain Basic Information on Truck Transport. Presented at the 76th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board (TRB) and accepted for publication in the TRB series, Washington D.C., USA, 1997.
7. Railroad Transportation Information (in Spanish). Programming and Systems Underdirectorate, National Mexican Railroads (FNM), Mexico D.F., 1996.
8. Development of a Strategic Planning Process for Freight Transportation (in Spanish). Secretariat of Communications and Transports (SCT), Mexico D.F., 1994.
9. Strategic Transportation Analysis (STAN). INRO Consultants Inc., Montreal, Canada, 1995.
10. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.
11. Archondo-Callao R. Vehicle Operating Cost Model (Version 3). The Highway Design and Maintenance Standards Series, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1989.
12. Railroad and Intermodal Operating Information (in Spanish). Union Pacific Railroad, Mexico D.F., 1996.
13. Truck and Railroad Economical, Operational, and Infrastructure Data (in Spanish). Secretariat of Communications and Transports (SCT), Mexico D.F., 1996.
14. Petersen E. R. Over-the-Road Transit Time for a Single Track Railway. Transportation Science, No. 8, pp. 65–79, 1974.
15. Topographic Charts (in Spanish). General Directorate of Geography, National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Data Processing (INEGI), Aguascalientes, Mexico, 1996.
16. National Transportation Atlas Data Bases: 1995. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1996.
17. National Highway Planning Network, Version 2. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1994.
18. 1990 Census TIGER. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D.C., 1990.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alberto Mendoza
Mexican Transportation Institute, P.O. Box 1098, 7600 Querétaro, Qro., Mexico
Claudia Z. Gil
Mexican Transportation Institute, P.O. Box 1098, 7600 Querétaro, Qro., Mexico
Juan M. Trejo
Mexican Transportation Institute, P.O. Box 1098, 7600 Querétaro, Qro., Mexico

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 12

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Development of Statewide Freight Flow Assignment with Freight Analysis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Methodology to Obtain a Mexico–U.S. Multiproduct Origin–Destination Ma...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A statistical study of intrastate vs. interstate regulatory reforms
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Measuring capacity flexibility of a transportation system
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub