Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Use of Best Value Selection Process: Utah Department of Transportation I-15 Design-Build Project

Abstract

Carter and Burgess, Inc., was selected by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) to evaluate several aspects of the I-15 design-build reconstruction project under way in Salt Lake City. The evaluations are being completed in part to fulfill commitments made to FHWA, which granted a Special Experimental Project 14 status to the I-15 project, permitting design-build contracting methods. Information is presented about the selection process used by UDOT to hire a design-build team to work on the project. UDOT decided to use a “best value” selection process instead of low cost to select a contractor. Comparisons are made between the design-bid-build and design-build processes. Described is the “best value” selection process used by UDOT to evaluate and select a contractor, using the detailed selection process. A description of the organizational structure required to prepare and review the proposals is presented. Unique features of the UDOT process are discussed, including use of stipend, risk sharing, ISO 9000 certification, design life, performance specifications, best and final offer, award fees, and use of CD-ROMs to distribute the proposal information. Lessons learned in the process also are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Stanley S. Postma
Carter & Burgess, 420 East South Temple, Suite 345, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Frank Carlile
Carter & Burgess, 1000 Legion Place, Suite 1400, Orlando, Florida 32801
James E. Roberts
Engineering Service Center, Caltrans, Department, MS 9, 1801 30th Street, Sacramento, CA 95816

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 17

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Quantitative Methods for Design-Build Team Selection
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Dynamic Prediction Model of As-Built Roughness in Asphaltic Concrete P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Panel Data Analysis of Factors Affecting As-Built Roughness of Asphalt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub