Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Developing a Proposal for a Multi-User Intermodal Freight Terminal as a Public-Private Partnership: Lessons Learned About Public and Private Perspectives, Timing, and Roles

Abstract

Intermodal rail terminals are an important part of an integrated freight transportation system. The location of intermodal terminals often has depended on where railroads had spare land adjacent to freight-rail lines. But many of these locations are less than ideal in terms of surrounding land uses and offer little scope for expansion as intermodal traffic grows. A study undertaken in Minnesota to evaluate the need for new or expanded intermodal terminal facilities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area is described. The process was funded by the metropolitan planning organization for the Twin Cities region, the state department of transportation, and three private railroad carriers. It involved a series of studies to determine the market for an intermodal facility, to locate a site and develop a proposal for a multi-user terminal, and to assess the terminal’s economic benefits for the region. Several lessons were learned during this public-private partnership process; these are useful for other metropolitan areas considering freight needs. The public and private sectors bring different perspectives to the development process, and coordinating their decision making is a challenge. It is crucial to obtain and to maintain appropriate and timely access to decision makers. The competitive positions of carriers must be assessed and the project’s impact on the relative market share among them will be critical. Given the lack of support by the railroads to develop a joint-use intermodal facility, as recommended in the study, neither the railroads nor the development community was willing to implement the project.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Muller G. Intermodal Freight Transportation, 3rd ed. Eno Transportation Foundation and Intermodal Association of North America, Landsdowne, VA, 1995.
2. Frazier C., Aeppli A., Martland C. D., and Norris B. Analysis of Intermodal Terminal Highway Access to Economic Activity Centers. In Transportation Research Circular No. 459: Intermodal Freight Terminal of the Future. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., July 1996, pp. 43–52.
3. Cambridge Systematics, Apogee Research, Jack Faucett Associates, and Sydec, Inc. Intermodal Freight Transportation: Overview of Impediments, Data Sources for Intermodal Transportation Planning, and Annotated Bibliography. Report DOT-T-96-04. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1995.
4. Selness C. L., and Barton J. E. Minnesota Intermodal Regional Terminal Project. In Transportation Research Circular No. 459: Intermodal Freight Terminal of the Future. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., July 1996, pp. 66–73.
5. R. L. Banks & Associates, Inc. Twin Cities Region Intermodal Terminal Needs Study. Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1995.
6. Parsons Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., RL Banks & Associates, Inc., H&M International. Intermodal Terminal Operating Plan and Business Plan—Step One: Operating Parameters; Step Two: Operating Plan; Step Three: Final Pro-Forma Business Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1996.
7. Minnesota Intermodal Railroad Terminal Feasibility Study. Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1996.
8. Special Report 246: Paying Our Way: Estimating Marginal Social Costs of Freight Transportation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.
9. McCubbin D. R., and Mark A. Delucchi. The Social Cost of the Health Effects of Motor-Vehicle Air Pollution. Report No. 11. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, 1996.
10. Plumeau P., and Jones J. Incorporating Freight Issues into Baltimore’s Regional Transportation Planning Agenda: Progress to Date and Lessons Learned. In Transportation Research Record 1613, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 20–26.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

James E. Barton
Metropolitan Council, Mears Park Center, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101
Cecil L. Selness
Minnesota Department of Transportation, Mail Stop 125, 555 Park, Suite 200, St. Paul, MN 55103
R. John Anderson
Minnesota Department of Transportation, Mail Stop 125, 555 Park, Suite 200, St. Paul, MN 55103
Donna L. Lindberg
Minnesota Department of Transportation, Mail Stop 125, 555 Park, Suite 200, St. Paul, MN 55103
Norman S. J. Foster
Minnesota Department of Transportation, Mail Stop 440, 395 John Ireland Boulevard, St. Paul, MN 55155

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 23

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Planning and managing intermodal transportation of hazardous materials...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A bi-objective model for planning and managing rail-truck intermodal t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even dista...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A lead-time based approach for planning rail–truck intermodal transpor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?––A review of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. An analysis of intermodal ramp selection methods
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub