Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Forecasting Dynamic Vehicular Activity on Freeways: Bridging the Gap Between Travel Demand and Emerging Emissions Models

Abstract

New emissions models for predicting carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and oxides of nitrogen require as input not only average speed but various measures of dynamic vehicular activity such as accelerations, decelerations, and idle events as well. Current travel demand modeling of transportation networks does not provide estimates of dynamic vehicular activity but, instead, forecasts traffic volumes and travel speeds. Simulation models could provide estimates of dynamic vehicular activity, but simulation models are not used or validated for the development of regional emissions inventories. Until simulation models are used for regional planning purposes, improvements to travel demand models (TDMs) must be forthcoming if the benefits of new emissions models are to be realized. There are at least two solutions for bridging the gap between TDM outputs and new, data-intensive emissions models. The first solution is the development of statistical models that forecast dynamic vehicular activity as a function of TDM outputs: average traffic speeds and volumes. The second solution is the identification of mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive regions of the speed-flow regime whereby representative dynamic driving sequences or cycles are characteristically different, particularly with respect to vehicular emissions. The present focus is on dynamic activity on freeways. A brief background of the research problem is first provided, along with stated research goals. The field study conducted to collect the necessary data on freeways is then described. The statistical task of identifying homogeneous regions of the speed-flow regime with respect to emissions activity is then discussed. Finally, the process by which typical dynamic driving activity is generated is given, followed by research conclusions and issues that require further study.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chatterjee A., Miller T. L., Philpot J. W., Whalley T. F. Jr., Guensler R., Hartgen D., Margiotta R. A., and Stopher P. R. NCHRP Report 394: Improving Transportation Data for Mobile Source Emissions Estimates. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., July 1997.
2. Washington S. Estimation of a Motor Vehicle Emissions Model and Assessment of an Intelligent Transportation Technology. Dissertation report. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis, 1994.
3. Washington S. A Cursory Analysis of EMFAC7G: Reconciling Observed and Predicted Emissions. Research report prepared for the Union of Concerned Scientists. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis, May 1994.
4. Croes B. E., and Fujita E. M., California’s Motor Vehicle Emission Inventory: Top Down and Bottom Up Assessments of Accuracy. California Air Resources Board. Presented at TNO/EURASAP Workshop on the Reliability of VOC Emission Databases, June 1993.
5. Guensler R. Vehicle Emission Rates and Average Vehicle Operating Speeds. Dissertation report. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis, 1993.
6. Guensler R. Data Needs for Evolving Motor Vehicle Emission Modeling Approaches. In Transportation Planning and Air Quality II (Benson P., ed.), ASCE, New York, 1993.
7. Purvis C. Sensitivity of Transportation Model Results to Uncertainty in Input Data. Presented at Transportation Modeling Tips and Trip-Ups Proceedings, an Air and Waste Management Association Specialty Conference, Pittsburgh, Pa., March 1992.
8. Transportation Research Circular 389: Environmental Research Needs in Transportation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992.
9. Barth M. Integrating a Modal Emissions Model into Various Transportation Modeling Frameworks. In Transportation Planning and Air Quality III, Emerging Strategies and Working Solutions (Washington S., ed.), ASCE, New York, 1998, pp. 38–50.
10. Guensler R., Washington S., and Bachman W. Overview of the MEASURE Modeling Framework. In Transportation Planning and Air Quality III, Emerging Strategies and Working Solutions (Washington S., ed.), ASCE, New York, 1998, pp. 51–70.
11. Larson L. Facility Based Driving Cycles for California: Background, Construction and Preliminary Evaluation. Proc., International Workshop on Vehicle Driving Cycles, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, April 6–7, 1995.
12. Austin T. C., Di Genova F. J., Carlson T. R., Joy R. W., Gianolini K., and Lee J. M. Characterization of Driving Patterns and Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles in California. Final Report A932-185. Prepared for California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Research Division, Sacramento. Sierra Research, Inc., Nov. 1993, p. 110–117.
13. Austin T. C., Carlson T. R., and Dulla R. G. Methodology for Generating Driving Cycles for Inventory Development. Report SR95-09-02. Prepared for Environmental Protection Agency, September 29, 1995, pp. 61–64.
14. Carlson T. R., and Austin T. C. Development of Speed Correction Cycles. Draft report. Prepared for Environmental Protection Agency, March 5, 1997, pp. 9–14.
15. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual., 3rd ed. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
16. Roberts C., and Washington S. Experimental Design, Data Collection, and Model Development to Forecast Vehicle Modes of Operation. In Transportation Planning and Air Quality III, Emerging Strategies and Working Solutions (Washington S., ed.), ASCE, New York, 1998, pp. 29–37.
17. Grant C., and Roberts C. A. Comparison of Remote Versus On-Board Instrumentation for Collection of Modal Activity in Mobile Emissions Modeling. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting, Air and Waste Management Association, San Diego, Calif., June 1998.
18. Washington S., Wolf J., and Guensler R. A Binary Recursive Partitioning Method for Modeling Hot-Stabilized Emissions from Motor Vehicles. In Transportation Research Record 1587, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 96–105.
19. Breiman L., Friedman J., Olshen R., and Stone C. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, Calif., 1984.
20. Clark L. A., and Pregibon D. Tree Based Models. In Statistical Models in S. Chapman & Hall, New York (formerly Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole), Monterey, Calif., 1992, ch. 9.
21. Watson H. C., et al. Development of the Melbourne Peak Cycle. Paper 82148. SAE of Australia, 1982.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Craig A. Roberts
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355
Simon Washington
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355
John D. Leonard, II
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 10

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Individuals’ Acceptance to Free-Floating Electric Carsharing Mode: A W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Effect of On-Ramp Geometric and Operational Factors on Vehicle Activit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Characterizing on-road variables that affect passenger vehicle modal o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. How Much Can Vehicle Emissions Be Reduced?: Exploratory Analysis of an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub