Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Integrated Approach to Environmental Rating for Light Vehicles

Abstract

Consumer education and other market-oriented approaches to environmental protection require coherent information on the environmental performance of the products in question. Although light-duty vehicles are a focus of numerous federal and state policies, information on the environmental performance of vehicles is fragmented. Heightened interest in market-oriented approaches motivates the development of a more integrated approach to motor vehicle environmental information. An environmental rating methodology for light-duty vehicles was developed on the basis of principles of life-cycle assessment and environmental economics. The method was designed given the limitations of the available data by make and model in the U.S. market. It combines the impacts of traditionally regulated (criteria) pollutants with those of greenhouse gas emissions, covering both the vehicle life cycle and the fuel cycle, by using a mass-based characterization of vehicle manufacturing impacts. This methodology was applied in a consumer-oriented publication that was first released in early 1998 that will be updated annually. The data issues, assumptions, and analysis methods used to develop these vehicle ratings are addressed. The application of the methodology to model year 1998 is summarized. Finally, research needs for updating and refining the methodology are identified.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Model Year 1998 Fuel Economy Guide (annual since 1980). U.S. Department of Energy, 1997.
2. DeCicco J., and Thomas M. Green Guide to Cars and Trucks: Model Year 1998. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 1988.
3. Dyson C., Magavern B., Shah J., and Stephens T. The Green Buyer’s Car Book. Public Citizen, Washington, D.C., 1994.
4. Auto-Umweltliste. Verkehrsclub Deutschland, Bonn, Germany, 1997.
5. The Use of Life Cycle Assessment in Environmental Labeling. Report EPA 742-R-93-003. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1993.
6. Keoleian G. A., Kar K., Manion M. M., and Bulkley J. W. Industrial Ecology of the Automobile: A Lifecycle Perspective. SAE, Warrendale, Pa., 1997.
7. Graedel T. E., and Allenby B. R. Industrial Ecology and the Automobile. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1998.
8. DeCicco J., and Thomas M. Rating the Environmental Impacts of Motor Vehicles: The Green Guide to Cars and Trucks Methodology, 1998 Edition. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 1998.
9. DeLuchi M. A. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from the Use of Transportation Fuels and Electricity. Report ANL/ESD/TM 22. Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory, 1991.
10. Calvert J. G., Heywood J. B., Sawyer R. F., and Seinfeld J. H. Achieving Acceptable Air Quality: Some Reflections on Controlling Vehicle Emissions. Science, Vol. 261, July 2, 1993, pp. 37–45.
11. Ross M., Goodwin R., Watkins R., Wang M. Q., and Wenzel T. Real-World Emissions from Model Year 1993, 2000 and 2010 Passenger Cars. Report prepared for The Energy Foundation. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 1995.
12. Ross M., Goodwin R., Watkins R., Wenzel T., and Wang M. Q. Real-World Emissions from Conventional Passenger Cars. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, in press.
13. Mobile 5a Emission Model. Office of Mobile Sources, Environmental Protection Agency, 1996.
14. Mintz M. M., Vyas A. R. D., and Conley L. A. Differences Between EPA-Test and In-Use Fuel Economy: Are the Correction Factors Correct? In Transportation Research Record 1416, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 124–130.
15. Hwang R. Are Cars Still a Problem? Real-World Emission Reductions from Passenger Vehicles over the Past 30 Years. Union of Concerned Scientists, Berkeley, Calif., 1997.
16. Wang M. Q. Development and Use of the GREET Model to Estimate Fuel Cycle Energy Use and Emissions of Various Transportation Technologies and Fuels. Report ANL/ESD-31. Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory, 1996.
17. Delucchi M. A. GHG (Greenhouse Gas) Emissions Model. Computer Spreadsheet. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1997.
18. Delucchi M. A., and McCubbin D. R. The Contribution of Motor Vehicles and Other Sources to Ambient Air Pollution. Report UCD-ITS-RR96-3(16). Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1996.
19. Delucchi M. A. The Annualized Social Cost of Motor-Vehicle Use in the United States, 1990-1991: Summary of Theory, Data, Methods, and Results. Report UCD-ITS-RR96-3(1). Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1997.
20. Ottinger R. L. (ed.). Environmental Costs of Electricity. Prepared by the Pace University Center for Environmental Legal Studies. Oceana Publications, New York, 1990.
21. Wang M. Q., and Santini D. J. Monetary Values of Air Pollutant Emissions in Various U.S. Regions. In Transportation Research Record 1475, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 33–41.
22. Duleep K. G. The Potential for Evolutionary and Revolutionary Technologies to Improve Automotive Fuel Economy. In Transportation, Energy, and the Environment: How Far Can Technology Take Us? (DeCicco J. and Delucchi M., eds.), American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 1997.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Martin Thomas
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 801, Washington, DC 20036
John DeCicco
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 801, Washington, DC 20036

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 6

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub