Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Development of Access Spacing Guidelines for Nonfreeway Weaving Environments

Abstract

Access on the frontage road in close proximity to exit ramp terminals can amplify the amount and severity of weaving that occurs and can lead to operational and safety problems on the frontage road. Research activities directed at evaluating the operation of frontage roads with unsignalized marginal access located at different distances from exit ramp terminal points and developing guidelines for appropriate spacing under these conditions are summarized here. The basic research approach consisted of (a) analyzing accident data; (b) observing operations in the field to identify distances required to safely make weaving maneuvers; and (c) developing an analytical model to predict the density of the weaving section on the frontage road as a function of frontage road volume, exit ramp volume, total driveway volume, frontage road configuration, and exit ramp to access spacing. The model was developed from the results of a computer simulation (using CORSIM) that was calibrated with field data from several frontage road sites in Texas. Results of the accident and weaving (field observation) analyses were used to develop a recommended minimum distance of 140 m between exit ramp terminal points and the nearest frontage road access; the analytical model was used to develop desirable spacing distances ranging from 140 to 300 m. The model was also used to identify possible level-of-service boundaries that can be used to assess the quality of service provided on a particular section of frontage road.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
2. Operations and Procedures Manual. Part IV, Interim Metric Version. TxDOT, Highway Design Division, Austin, Tex., 1994.
3. Nowlin L., and Fitzpatrick K. Two-Sided Weaving Analysis on One-Way Frontage Roads. Report 1393-2, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex., 1996.
4. Chiu H., Carter E. C., and Schonfeld P. M. State-of-the-Art Studies/FY’87: Task 8—Intersections and Driveways Near Freeway Ramps. MD 88/02, Maryland Department of Transportation, July 1987.
5. Copas T. L., and Pennock H. A. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 35: Design and Control of Freeway Off Ramp Terminals. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976.
6. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1994.
7. Jacobson M. Effects of Weaving on Frontage Road Operations. M.S. thesis. Texas A&M University, College Station, 1997.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Marc Jacobson
Texas Transportation Institute, 3500 NW Loop 410, San Antonio, TX 78229
Lewis Nowlin
Texas Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 506, Hearne, TX 77859
Russell H. Henk
Texas Transportation Institute, 3500 NW Loop 410, San Antonio, TX 78229

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 5

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub