Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Evaluation of Superpave Repeated Shear at Constant Height Test To Predict Rutting Potential of Mixes: Performance of Three Pavement Sections in North Carolina

Abstract

The repeated shear at constant height (RSCH) test to predict the rutting potential of asphalt aggregate mixes based on field performance of pavement sections in North Carolina has been evaluated. Three pavement sections in Buncombe, McDowell, and Montgomery counties were selected based on the degree of rutting severity experienced after several years in service. The pavement section in Buncombe County showed no rutting, whereas those in McDowell and Montgomery counties showed light and severe rutting distress, respectively. Results of this study indicated that the RSCH test can clearly identify the well-performing versus poorly performing mixes (i.e., Buncombe versus Montgomery counties). Although previous studies in which the French pavement rutting tester and the Georgia loaded-wheel tester were used indicated early rutting of the pavement in Buncombe County, the RSCH test indicated that the mix was not susceptible to excessive rutting—in line with field experience of no significant pavement distress observed in this pavement. For Montgomery County, the RSCH test clearly showed that the mix was susceptible to excessive rutting with the wheelpath cores distinctly showing potential for tertiary flow—in agreement with experience of significant rutting distress observed in this pavement.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Stuart K. D. Results of Wheel-Tracking Tests Performed on Pavement Slabs from Sections of I-26 and I-40 near Ashville, North Carolina. Special Projects and Engineering Division, HNR-20, FHWA, July 18, 1996.
2. Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete and Other Hot-Mix Types, 6th ed. Manual Series No. 2 (MS-2), Asphalt Institute, Lexington, Ky.
3. The Superpave Mix Design System Manual of Specifications, Test Methods, and Practices. SHRP-A-379, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, 253 pp.
4. SHRP Superpave Binder Selection Program—SHRPBIND, Version 2.1. Pavement Performance Division, FHWA, McLean, Va., 1995.
5. Shook J. F., Finn F. N., Witczak M. W., and Monismith C. L. Thickness Design of Asphalt Pavement—The Asphalt Institute Method. Proc., Fifth International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Vol. 1, 1982, pp. 17–53.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Akhtarhusein A. Tayebali
Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695
N. Paul Khosla
Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695
Glen A. Malpass
Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695
H. Fred Waller
5700 Castlebrook Drive, Raleigh, NC 27604

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 10

  1. Simultaneous evaluation of rutting-stripping performance and cracking ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Evaluation of rutting potential of asphalts using resilient modulus te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Evaluation of wheel tracking and field rutting susceptibility of dense...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Evaluating the Shear Resistance of Hot Mix Asphalt by the Direct Shear...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Field Validation of Superpave Shear Test on NCAT Test Track
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. An Overview of Fundamental and Simulative Performance Tests for Hot Mi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Use of the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer and Repeated Simple Shear Test at...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Variability of Asphalt Mixture Tests Using Superpave Shear Tester Repe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. An Overview of Fundamental and Simulative Performance Tests for Hot Mi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Field Validation of Superpave Shear Test on NCAT Test Track
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub