Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Using Commodity Flow Survey Data to Develop a Truck Travel-Demand Model for Wisconsin

Abstract

Four similar truck travel-demand (TTD) models were developed for Wisconsin using 1993 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) origin–destination (O-D) data and a limited number of truck classification count data. First, statewide zonal-level trip tables were developed using the CFS database. Then gravity models for four trip types were calibrated to match the trip-length frequency distributions of the CFS O-D trip tables. Finally, zonal trip productions and attractions were adjusted using an iterative procedure to match assigned traffic volumes with truck classification count data for 40 selected links. The four alternative TTD models differed only in the method used to assign external trips to the external stations. All of the models provided reasonable levels of goodness-of-fit to the 40 selected calibration links, as well as 104 additional count locations across the state. The primary limitation of the four models was that they substantially underestimated the truck trips that crossed the state boundary. The CFS data focused on longer-distance transport of major commodities; therefore, the local truck trips that used the external stations were underrepresented in the model. Simple regression models for estimating trip productions and attractions were developed using zonal population and employment as the independent variables. These improved models were possible because the CFS data made available more detailed initial estimates of trip productions and attractions.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Procedure Manual of Forecasting Traffic on the Rural Truck Highway System. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Traffic Forecasting Unit, Program Management Division, St. Paul, 1985.
2. State Transportation Master Plan: Rebuilding New York. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, N.Y., 1987.
3. Sirisonponsilp S., and Schonfeld P. Truck Volume Analysis Procedures, Volume—Truck Volume Forecasting. Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration, Baltimore, 1988.
4. Albright D. Forecasting Heavy Commercial Traffic as a Percentage of Daily Traffic. New Mexico State Highway Department, Santa Fe, 1985.
5. Wilbur Smith Associates and Reebie Associates. Multimodal Freight Forecasts for Wisconsin. Draft Report. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, 1995.
6. Park M.-B. Development of Statewide Truck Traffic Forecasting Method by Using Limited O-D Survey Data. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1995.
7. Taqui A. M., and Chidester E. J. Truck Travel Survey and Truck Trip Modeling: Statewide Traffic Model. Technical Report 6. Kentucky Department of Transportation, Frankfort, July 1978.
8. Maze T. H., Smadi A. G., and Souleyrette R. An Iowa Approach to Statewide Freight Demand Models or the Onion Approach to Freight Demand Forecasting. Iowa State University, Ames, 1996.
9. Intrastate Travel Demand Modeling. North Carolina Department of Transportation, North Carolina Urban Transportation Planning Information System, Technical Report 12, Raleigh, 1991.
10. Nellett R., Robinson G. C., McKinley J., and Witherspoon L. Michigan’s Statewide Travel Demand Model. Presented at 75th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996.
11. Smadi A., and Maze T. H. Statewide Truck Transportation Planning: Methodology and Case Study (with Discussion). In Transportation Research Record 1522, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 55–63.
12. Park M.-B., and Smith R. L. Jr. Development of a Statewide Truck-Travel Demand Model with Limited Origin-Destination Survey Data. In Transportation Research Record 1602, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 14–21.
13. Wilson E. M., and Wang J. Statewide Transportation Planning—Interactive Modeling Process. Final Report. University of Wyoming, Laramie, May 1995.
14. 1993 Commodity Flow Survey—State Summaries. U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington D.C., Sept. 1996.
15. Krishnan V., and Hancock K. Highway Freight Flow Assignment in Massachusetts Using Geographic Information Systems. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.
16. TRANPLAN, Transportation Planning Software. The Urban Analysis Group, Hayward, Calif., 1997.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Wen-Jing Huang
China Engineering Consultants, Inc., 185-27F Hsin-Hai Road, Sec. 2, Taipei, Taiwan
Robert L. Smith, Jr.
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 18

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Freight production of agricultural commodities in India using multiple...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Transferability and enhancement of a microsimulation model for estimat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Nationwide Freight Generation Models: A Spatial Regression Approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub