Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

In the Possibilities Are the Solutions: Assessment and Implications of the Public-Involvement Process During the Environmental Impact Study of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge

Abstract

The Woodrow Wilson Bridge is an essential part of the Washington, D.C., and Interstate transportation systems. The bridge provides the only Potomac River crossing for the southern half of the greater Washington region. Because of substantial local and regional growth, travel demand across the drawbridge has grown to more than twice the design capacity of the structure. To address these mobility challenges, FHWA initiated the Woodrow Wilson Bridge Improvement Study in 1988 as a cooperative effort among affected jurisdictions, agencies, and the public. Given the complexities of the project and time-critical nature to reach a decision on a preferred alternative, public involvement was a key feature of the environmental study process. The essential elements of the publicparticipation and outreach process are highlighted. An assessment of the outreach process was conducted once the environmental study was completed. A randomized, statistically based telephone survey was conducted to measure the effectiveness of the public-involvement program, to guide public-involvement programs for the next phase of this project and for future projects, and to help gauge attitudes toward public involvement of those with a vested interest in the project. Results of the survey and implications for the design of public-participation programs are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Yankelovich D. Coming to Public Judgment in a Complex World. Syracuse Press, New York, 1991.
2. Howard-Stein Hudson Associates, et al. Public-Involvement Techniques for Transportation Decision Making. Report FHWA-PD-96-031. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1996.
3. Syme G., and Sadler B. Evaluation of Public Involvement in Water Resources Planning. Evaluation Review, Vol. 18, No. 5, Oct. 1994, pp. 523–542.
4. Boyd D., and Gronlund A. The Ithaca Model: A Practical Experience in Community-Based Planning. In Transportation Research Record 1499, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 56–61.
5. Bates T. B., and Wahl D. We Can’t Hear You! San Diego’s Techniques for Getting Balanced Community Input in Major Investment Studies. In Transportation Research Record 1571, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 197–207.
6. National Commission on Civic Renewal. A Nation of Spectators: How Civic Disengagement Weakens America and What We Can Do About It. University of Maryland Press, College Park, 1998.
7. Berman E. Dealing with Cynical Citizens. Public Administration Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, March/April 1997, pp. 105–112.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David Keever
Science Applications International Corporation, 7927 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102
Geraldine Frankoski
Science Applications International Corporation, 7927 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102
Jana Lynott
Science Applications International Corporation, 7927 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 12

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. All mega-projects are local? citizen participation lessons from the bi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Public Outreach in Pedestrian Plan for Durham, North Carolina...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Developing a Simple System for Conflict Management of Public Involveme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The internet, GIS and public participation in transportation planning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Understanding and Managing Conflict in Transportation Project Public I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub