Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Resilient Modulus Measurement of Fine-Grained Subgrade Soils

Abstract

The effects of several variables that may influence the resilient modulus of fine-grained subgrade soils have been studied using two different soils. The number of load applications, the rest period, and the load sequence are shown to have no significant effect on the measured resilient modulus. It is also demonstrated that confining pressure in the range of 0 to 69 kPa (0 to 10 psi) has less than a 5 percent effect on the measured resilient modulus of the investigated soils. However, the condition of specimen ends is shown to influence the measured resilient modulus. A comparison between the measured resilient modulus for both soils using impact and kneading compaction methods is also presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1986.
2. Vinson T. S. Fundamentals of Resilient Modulus Testing. Proc., Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 1989.
3. Ho R. K. H. Repeated Load Tests on Unsaturated Soils—A Florida Experience. Proc., Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 1989.
4. Jackson N. C. Thoughts on AASHTO T-274-82, Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils. Proc., Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 1989.
5. Cochran G. R. Minnesota Department of Transportation Experience with Laboratory MR Testing. Proc., Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 1989.
6. Resilient Modulus of Unbound Granular Base/Subbase Materials and Subgrade Soils. SHRP Protocol 46. SHRP-LTPP Laboratory Material Testing Guide, Version 1.0, Strategic Highway Research Program, Aug. 1989.
7. Pezo R. F., Carlos G., Hudson W. R., and Stokoe K. H. II. Development of a Reliable Resilient Modulus Test for Subgrade and Non-Granular Subbase Materials for Use in Routine Pavement Design. Report II 77-4 F. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, 1992.
8. Casagrande A., and Hirschfeld R. C. Stress-Deformation and Strength Characteristics of a Clay Compacted to a Constant Dry Unit Weight. Research Conference on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, Boulder, Colo., ASCE, New York, June 1962.
9. Muhanna A. S. A Testing Procedure and a Model for Resilient Modulus and Accumulated Plastic Strain of Cohesive Subgrade Soils. Ph.D. dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1994.
10. Muhanna A. S., Rahman M. S., and Lambe P. C. Model for Resilient Modulus and Permanent Strain of Subgrade Soils. In Transportation Research Record 1619, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 85–93.
11. John P. W. M. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments. Macmillan Company, New York, 1971.
12. Seed H. B., Chan C. K., and Lee C. E. Resilience Characteristics of Subgrade Soils and Their Relation to Fatigue Failures in Asphalt Pavement. Proc., International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavement, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1962, pp. 611–636.
13. Tanimoto K., and Nishi M. On Resilience Characteristics of Some Soils Under Repeated Loading. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1970.
14. Thompson M. R., and Robnett Q. L. Resilient Properties of Subgrade Soils—Final Report. Transportation Engineering Series No. 14, Illinois Cooperative Highway Research Program Series No. 160, University of Illinois, Urbana, June 1976, pp. 1–38.
15. Thompson M. R., and Robnett Q. L. Resilient Properties of Subgrade Soils. Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 105, No. TE1, 1979.
16. Thompson M. R. Factors Affecting the Resilient Moduli of Soils and Granular Materials. Proc., Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 1989.
17. Fredlund D. G., Bergan A. T., and Wong P. K. Relation Between Resilient Modulus and Stress Conditions for Cohesive Subgrade Soils. In Transportation Research Record 642, TRB, 1977.
18. Lambe T. W., and Whitman R. V. Soil Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1969.
19. Johnson A. W., and Sallberg J. R. Factors That Influence Field Compaction of Soils. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1960, pp. 29–48.
20. Edil T. B., and Motan S. E. Soil-Water Potential and Resilient Behavior of Subgrade Soils. In Transportation Research Record 705, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1979, pp. 54–63.
21. Elfino M. K., and Davidson J. L. Modeling Field Moisture in Resilient Moduli Testing, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 24, ASCE, New York, 1989.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

A. S. Muhanna
An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus West Bank, Palestine
M. S. Rahman
North Carolina State University, Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908
P. C. Lambe
North Carolina State University, Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 45

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. Current situations, advantages/disadvantages and future developments o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Research on Cumulative Deformation Characteristics of Subgrade Filling...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Modeling resilient modulus of fine-grained materials using different s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Assessment of Molding Moisture and Suction on Resilient Modulus of Lim...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Evaluation of Resilient Modulus Test Protocols for New Mexico Subgrade...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Resilient Behavior of Compacted Silt under the Repeated Triaxial Test
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Stress Path Testing of Realistically Cured Lime and Lime/Cement Stabil...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Stabilizing Soft Fine-Grained Soils with Fly Ash
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Resilient Modulus Variations with Water Content
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub