Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Two-Dimensional Modeling of Collision Dynamics of Deflecting Concrete Barriers

Abstract

Freestanding concrete highway barriers were originally implemented for work-zone applications. These barriers are becoming more widespread in their use and have been implemented in some innovative counter-flow applications. As the amount of freestanding barriers increases, so does the demand for detailed operational performance data. However, investigations of their crash protection and operation have been limited compared with those for the more common post-and-beam guardrail configurations. Computer simulation is one method for evaluating the performance of freestanding concrete barriers during vehicle collisions. A two-dimensional model of vehicle and barrier dynamics was developed to investigate the concrete barrier systems used by the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Highways. The simulation program was developed by using a multibody formulation for the barrier segments. A description of the model formulation is presented with a comparison of model output of recorded crash test data.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Hahn K. C., and Bryden J. E. Crash Tests of Construction-Zone Traffic Barriers. In Transportation Research Record 769, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 12–20.
2. Glauz D. L. Performance Evaluation of a Movable Concrete Barrier. In Transportation Research Record 1258, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1990, pp. 92–106.
3. Fortuniewicz J. S., Bryden J. E., and Phillips R. G. Crash Tests of Portable Concrete Median Barrier for Maintenance Zones. In Transportation Research Record 942, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 31–36.
4. Beason W. L., and Ivey D. L. Structural Performance Levels of Portable Concrete Barriers. In Transportation Research Record 1024, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 51–59.
5. Ross H. E., Sicking D. L., Zimmer R. A., and Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1993.
6. Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 230: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981.
7. Bronstad M. E., and Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 153: Recommended Procedures for Vehicle Crash Testing of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974.
8. Ivey D. L., Ross H. E. Jr., Hirsch T. J., Buth C. E., and Olson R. M. Portable Concrete Median Barriers: Structural Design and Dynamic Performance. In Transportation Research Record 769, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 20–30.
9. Loumiet J., Graham J. L., and Migletz J. Static Analysis of Portable Concrete Barrier Connectors. Presented at 67th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1988.
10. Walker K. C., and Ross H. E. Jr. Documentation of Concrete Median Barrier Advanced Dynamic Analysis. In Barriers in Construction Zones, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1985.
11. Roadside Design Guide. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1996.
12. Bigg G., and Moebes T. A Study of Vehicle Stiffness Properties from Damage Data. Trantech Corporation, Redmond, Wash., 1994.
13. Fonda A. G. Physical Models for Crush Energy Evaluation in Oblique Impact. Proc., Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference VII, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1991.
14. Thomson R. W. Performance of Concrete Highway Barriers. Ph.D. thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1996.
15. Wittenburg J. L. Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies. B.G., Stuttgart, Germany, 1977.
16. Perera H. S. Simulation of Vehicle Impacts into Concrete Safety Shaped Barriers. Ph.D. thesis. Texas A&M University, College Station, 1985.
17. Prasad A. K. CRASH3 Damage Algorithm Reformulation for Front and Rear Collisions. Technical Paper Series 900098. SAE, Warrendale, Pa., 1990.
18. Prasad A. K. Energy Absorbed by Vehicle Structures in Side Impacts Technical Paper Series 910599. SAE, Warrendale, Pa., 1991.
19. Labra J. J., Calcote L. R., and Bronstad M. E. Investigation of Canadian Concrete Guardwall Performance. Southwest Research Institute Report 03-4685-209. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex., 1977.
20. Segal D. Highway-Vehicle-Object Simulation Model—1976 Engineering Manual—Analysis. FHWA-RD-76-164. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1975.
21. Garrott W. R. Measured Vehicle Inertial Parameters—NHTSA’s Data Through Sept. 1992. Technical Paper Series 930897. SAE, Warrendale, Pa., 1993.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Robert Thomson
Crash Safety Division, Department of Machine and Vehicle Design, Chalmers University of Technology, S412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Douglas Romilly
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2324 Main Mall, Vancouver, V5T 1Z4 British Columbia, Canada
Frank Navin
Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2324 Main Mall, Vancouver V5T 1Z4 British Columbia, Canada

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 12

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub