Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Efficacy of Safety-Related Investments To Reduce Fatalities on the East Japan Railway

Abstract

In any organization there is a limit on the amount of resources that can be used for risk reduction. By examining strategies for reducing the risk of fatalities on the East Japan Railway (JR East), a framework in which risk-reduction resources can be used well is described. Basic principles of risk assessment are introduced. Various analyses and models to study collisions, earthquake effects, level-crossing accidents, and operating policies regarding natural hazards are presented. The concept of a global risk assessment of JR East is included. The question of perceived versus objective risk is discussed in the context of safety-related investment.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Barnett A. Not by Chance Alone: The Passenger Safety Record of East Japan Railway. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1997.
2. Bohnenblust H., Odoni A., and Sussman J. Perspectives on a Safety Management Plan. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1995.
3. Nasser T.-O., and Odoni A. A Framework To Monitor the Safety Performance of Transportation Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
4. Si Z., and Sussman J. Reducing Earthquake Risk on the East Japan Railway Through Investment in Safety. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
5. Anandarao S., and Martland C. Risk Assessment of Level-Crossing Safety in the JR East System. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
6. Papadimitriou A., and Veneziano D. Seismic Safety of the Tohoku Shinkansen: Assessment and Enhancement. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1995.
7. Rimm-Kaufman A. P. Risk Mitigation Models for a Japanese Railroad. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
8. Ishihara Y., and Sheridan T. Prediction of Human Error in Rail Car Maintenance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
9. Horiuchi M., and Fukuyama H. The Global Risk Assessment in JR East. JR East, Tokyo, 1997.
10. Starr C. Social Benefits vs. Technological Risk, Science, Vol. 165, 1969, pp. 1232–1238.
11. Litai D., Lanning D. D., and Rasmussen N. C. The Public Perception of Risk. Proc., Meeting of Society of Risk Analysis, Washington, D.C., 1981.
12. Cross F. B. Facts and Values in Risk Assessment, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 59, 1998, pp. 27–40.
13. Waiting for the Big One. The Economist, CONEG, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1991, pp. 101–103.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Arnold I. Barnett
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139
Carl D. Martland
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139
Amedeo R. Odoni
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139
Joseph M. Sussman
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 11

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub