Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Simplified Track Evaluation for Low-Speed, Low-Traffic Railroad Lines

Abstract

The development of a railroad track–evaluation computer program called TRACK is described, and its application is summarized. TRACK was created to provide a simple tool to help determine the need for track rehabilitation. The program assesses the track’s vertical load–carrying capability and shows some relative effects of track improvements or deterioration. The evaluation is based on five equations that provide values for rail bending stress, tie bending stress, tie reaction, ballast surface stress, and subgrade surface stress. This information is important for initial design, rehabilitation planning, and basic track evaluation, but has not always been readily available in an easy-to-use format. Although the evaluation method in TRACK is simplified, it illustrates the complex interaction among the main track components—namely, that a change in one component affects the others. TRACK automatically selects values for equation variables from information about track characteristics and types of cars handled; the program then solves the equation. Calculated stresses are displayed beside suggested limiting values for the track. The basic approach is that if none of the four main track components (i.e., rail, ties, ballast, and subgrade) are overstressed, the track structure is considered suitable for the given traffic loading. TRACK is intended for low-speed, low-traffic railroad lines—those with conventional wood-tie track, with either jointed or welded rail, on which traffic is less than approximately 5 to 8 million gross tons per year, with maximum speeds of 25 to 30 mph.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Hay W. W. Railroad Engineering, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1982.
2. Stresses in Railroad Track—The Talbot Reports. American Railway Engineering Association, Washington, D.C., 1980.
3. Huang Y. H., Lin C., Deng X., and Rose J. KENTRACK, A Finite Element Computer Program for the Analysis of Railroad Tracks: User’s Manual. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kentucky, 1986.
4. Chang C. S., Adegoke C. W., and Selig E. T. The GEOTRACK Model for Railroad Track Performance. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 106, GT 11, Proc. Paper 15819, Nov. 1980.
5. Plotkin D. E., Wagers S. K., and Prose G. A Railroad Track Structural Analysis Method for Work Planning: Development and Example Application. Technical Report M-91/07, U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, Champaign, Ill., Oct. 1990.
6. Kurath P., and White D. R. Preliminary Results of Army Rail Fatigue Failure Testing for Mobilization Planning. Interim Report M-86/02, U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, Champaign, Ill., Dec. 1985.
7. Code C. J. Features in the Selection of Weight of Rail for New or Rehabilitated Lines. Proc., 53rd Annual Convention of the American Railway Engineering Association, Vol. 55, 1954, pp. 343–345.
8. Chow P., Lewis S. L., Reinschmidt A. J., and Barenberg E. J. Effects of Natural and Accelerated Aging on Oak Crossties. Proc., American Wood-Preservers’ Association, Stevensville, Md., Vol. 83, 1987, pp. 308–330.
9. Zarembski A. M. Strength Properties of Wood Crossties. Railway Track and Structures, Sept. 1990, pp. 12–13.
10. Russell A. Speaking Out: Railroading and the Tie Question. Railway Track and Structures, Nov. 1986, pp. 33–36.
11. Davis D. D., and Chow P. Tie Condition Inspection: A Case Study of the Failure Rate, Modes, and Clustering (AAR Report R-714). Bulletin of the American Railway Engineering Association, No. 723, Dec. 1989, pp. 350–381.
12. Russell A. Speaking Out: Tie Decay—Underrated Factor. Railway Track and Structures, Aug. 1986, pp. 34–37.
13. Wilcox W. W. Review of Literature on the Effects of Early Stages of Decay on Wood Strength. Wood and Fiber, Winter 1978, pp. 252–257.
14. Bodig J., and Goodman J. R. Prediction of Elastic Parameters for Wood. Wood Science, April 1973, pp. 249–264.
15. Scott J. F. Timber Crossties in Relation to Track Structure System Design. In Transportation Research Record 953, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 11–18.
16. Selig E., and Waters J. Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. Thomas Telford, London, United Kingdom, 1994.
17. Raymond G. M. Railroad Ballast and Subgrade Support. ASCE Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 104, GT 1, Proc. Paper 13471, Jan. 1978, pp. 45–50.
18. Yoder E. J., and Witczak M. W. Principles of Pavement Design. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1975.
19. Packard R. G. Design of Concrete Airport Pavement. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill., 1973.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Donald Plotkin
Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW, MS-20, Washington, DC 20590
Larry Sandhaas
421 176th Avenue, Milan, IL 61264

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 7

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub