Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1999

Shear Strength of Douglas Fir Timber Bridge Ties

Abstract

Tests on 480 240- × 290-mm (nominal 10- × 12-in.) bridge ties, both old and new, indicate that the characteristic strengths for shear given in most North American codes of practice seem to be unduly conservative. As a result of this test program, it is suggested that design requirements for shear in timber codes of practice be revised to reflect more correctly the structural behavior of the material, using concepts such as the weakest link principle and fracture mechanics considerations. The test program also clearly demonstrates that in many cases the allowable shear capacity can be doubled by using an overhang equal to the beam depth. The research indicates a savings on paper of over Can$200 million for the Canadian National Railway Company if the recommendations presented in this research are followed instead of those in the current Canadian Standards Association design code (086.1, 1994), the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association’s manual of recommended practice, or other typical North American codes of practice.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Timber Structures. In Manual for Railway Engineering, Vol. 2, American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association, Washington, D.C., 1997.
2. Foschi R. O., and Barrett J. D., Longitudinal Shear Strength of Douglas Fir. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, June 1976, pp. 198–208.
3. Madsen B., and Nielsen P. C., In-Grade Testing: Bending Tests in Canada June 1977–May 1978. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1978.
4. Madsen B., and Nielsen P. C., In-Grade Testing: Stiffness Adjustments. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1978.
5. Madsen B., and Nielsen P. C., In-Grade Testing: Investigation of Test Parameters in Parallel-to-Grain Tension. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1978, revised 1981.
6. Madsen B., and Nielsen P. C., In-Grade Testing: Tension Tests in Canada. Prepared for National Lumber Grades Authority, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1978.
7. Madsen B., and Stinson T., In-Grade Testing of Timber Four or More Inches in Thickness. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1982.
8. Madsen B., and Nielsen P. C., In-Grade Testing: Investigation of Test Parameters in Parallel-to-Grain Compression. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1978.
9. Madsen B. Structural Behaviour of Timber. Timber Engineering Ltd., Vancouver, B.C., 1992.
10. Madsen B. Shear Strength of Douglas Fir Timbers. CIB-W18/28-6-2. International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation, Working Commission W18-Timber Structures, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1995.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1999
Issue published: January 1999

Rights and permissions

© 1999 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Borg Madsen
Timber Engineering Ltd., 575 Alpine Court, North Vancouver, British Columbia V7R 2L5, Canada
Robert A.P. Sweeney
Canadian National Railway Company, Floor 15 HQ, P.O. Box 8100, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3N4, Canada

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub