Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2000

Bridge Inspection Decision Making Based on Sequential Hypothesis Testing Methods

Abstract

A bridge management system (BMS) is a decision support system used by a highway agency in selecting appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) activities and in allocating available resources effectively among facilities. BMS decision making is based on the condition of bridge components, their predicted deterioration, and the cost and effectiveness of M&R activities. Traditionally, bridge condition assessments have relied mainly on human inspectors; their results have generally been qualitative and subjective. More detailed inspections requiring some degree of destruction of the bridge, like drilling the deck to inspect for chloride contamination, have also been used. With recent technological developments, methods have been developed to evaluate the condition of bridge structures in a quantitative and objective manner. Associated with the use of these technologies are questions relating to inspection frequency, sample size, and the integration of data from the various technologies and human inspections. The application of a statistical decision-making method, sequential hypothesis testing, to these questions is presented. The mathematical formulation of the sequential hypothesis testing model, the derivation of optimal inspection policies, and the implementation of these policies in the context of bridge component inspection are discussed. A parametric analysis illustrates the sensitivity of the method to the cost structure of the problem, the precision of the technologies used, and the historical information or expert judgment regarding the condition of bridge components.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. NCHRP Bridgit Technical Manual. Draft technical report. National Engineering Technology Corporation, 1994.
2. Johnston D. W., and Zia P. Level-of-Service System for Bridge Evaluation. In Transportation Research Record 962, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 1–8.
3. Hudson S. W., Carmichael R. F. III, Moser L. O., Hudson W. R., and Wilkes W. J. NCHRP Report 300: Bridge Management Systems. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987.
4. Jiang Y., and Sinha K. C. Dynamic Optimization Model for Bridge Management Systems. In Transportation Research Record 1211, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 92–100.
5. The Finland Bridge Management System. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., 1991.
6. Feuer N. J., and Little R. G. Bridge Inspection. In Bridge Inspection and Rehabilitation: A Practical Guide (Silano L. G., ed.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1992.
7. Pontis Version 2.0 Technical Manual. Report FHWA-SA-94-031. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.
8. Hearn G., and Shim H.-S. Integration of Nondestructive Evaluation and Bridge Management. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1998, pp. 49–55.
9. Lackpour F. Concrete Superstructures. In Bridge Inspection and Rehabilitation: A Practical Guide (Silano L. G., ed.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1992.
10. Graber D. R. Inspection of the Substructure of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel Above and Below the Waterline. In Transportation Research Record 1268, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 130–137.
11. Madanat S. Optimal Infrastructure Management Decisions Under Uncertainty. Transportation Research C, Vol. 1C, No. 1, 1993, pp. 77–88.
12. Madanat S., and Ben-Akiva M. Optimal Inspection and Repair Policies for Infrastructure Facilities. Transportation Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1994, pp. 55–62.
13. DeGroot M. H. Optimal Statistical Decisions. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.
14. Bertsekas D. Dynamic Programming, Deterministic and Stochastic Models. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1987.
15. Arrow K. J., Blackwell D., and Girshick M. A. Bayes and Minimax Solutions of Sequential Decision Problems. Econometrica, Vol. 17, 1949, pp. 213–244.
16. Ellis H., Jiang M., and Corotis R. B. Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair with Partial Observability. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1995, pp. 92–99.
17. Smilowitz K., and Madanat S. Optimal Inspection, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Policies for Networks of Infrastructure Facilities. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering (forthcoming).

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2000
Issue published: January 2000

Rights and permissions

© 2000 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Samer Madanat
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Da-Jie Lin
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 16

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Application of Lean Engineering to Bridge Inspection
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub