Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2000

Estimating Road User Costs Associated with Highway Construction Projects: Simplified Method

Abstract

Road user costs (RUC) are defined as the estimated incremental daily costs to the traveling public resulting from the construction work being performed. Those costs are primarily time lost because of conditions such as detours/rerouting that add to travel time, reduced roadway capacity that slows travel speed and increases travel time, or a delay in the opening of a new or improved facility that prevents users from gaining travel time benefits. In Texas, RUC analyses and associated liquidated damages have been applied predominantly to high-profile urban freeway reconstruction projects, which are ideal candidates for RUC application because of the potential for very high motorist delay costs. A much wider range of projects involving the addition of capacity can be considered for RUC. Not all potential projects, however, are as complicated as urban freeway reconstruction efforts that require detailed simulation modeling to determine the value of RUC. The results of a research study that developed a manual technique for determining RUC are documented, along with associated liquidated damages for typical added-capacity and highway rehabilitation projects. The technique involves a series of look-up tables that provide RUC values on the basis of project type and a minimal number of project attributes. Two different approaches were employed: a before-and-after approach for added capacity projects and a during-versus-after-construction approach for rehabilitation projects.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Lewis D. L. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 269: Road User and Mitigation Costs in Highway Pavement Projects. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1999.
2. Borchardt D., and Voight A. A Short Course on Techniques for Determining Construction Related Road User Costs. Texas Transportation Institute, 1998.
3. McFarland W. F., Kabat R. J., and Krammes R. A. Comparison of Contracting Strategies for Reducing Project Construction Time. Final Report. FHWA/TX-94/1310-1F. Texas Transportation Institute, 1994.
4. Daniels G., Ellis D. R., and Stockton W. R. Techniques for Manually Estimating Road User Costs Associated with Construction Projects. Texas Transportation Institute, 1999.
5. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual, 3rd ed. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
6. Microcomputer Evaluation of Highway User Benefits. Final Report for NCHRP, Project 7-12. Texas Transportation Institute, 1993.
7. Introduction to Urban Travel Demand Forecasting. National Highway Institute Course Number 15254. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. http://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/.
8. McFarland W. F., et al. MicroBENCOST User’s Manual—Version 1.0. Prepared for NCHRP, Project 7-12. Texas Transportation Institute, 1993.
9. Barton R. Highway User Cost Tables: A Simplified Method of Estimating User Cost Savings for Highway Improvements. Research and Development Council, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 1993.
10. Gaj S. J. Lane Rental: An Innovative Contracting Practice. TR News, No. 162, Sept.–Oct. 1992, pp. 7–9.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2000
Issue published: January 2000

Rights and permissions

© 2000 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ginger Daniels
Texas Transportation Institute, 7715 Chevy Chase Drive, Suite 4.160, Austin, TX 78752
William R. Stockton
Texas Transportation Institute, 7715 Chevy Chase Drive, Suite 4.160, Austin, TX 78752
Robert Hundley
Texas Department of Transportation, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, TX 78701-2483

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 85

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 14

  1. Comparative Analysis of Vehicle Operating Cost Methods
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Current Practices of Calculating and Utilizing Road User Costs in the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Operation and Economic Analysis for Ring Road: Baqubah City as Case St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Regression Models of Road User Cost Prediction for Highway Maintenance...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Analysis of vehicle operating costs and optimal vehicle speeds using t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Optimal decision making in post-hazard bridge recovery strategies for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Effective Systems for Rating Pavement Condition
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Work Zone Planning in Pavement Rehabilitation: Integrating Cost, Durat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Simplified Model of Road-User Costs for Portuguese Highways
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Methodology to Develop Median Barrier Warrant Criteria
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Automated Work Zone Information System on Urban Freeway Rehabilitation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Planning Urban Highway Reconstruction with Traffic Demand Affected by ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub