Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2000

Future World Oil Prices and the Potential for New Transportation Fuels

Abstract

World petroleum demand is projected to continue increasing after the world enters the 21st century. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts low world oil prices for the indefinite future despite an expected 54 percent rise in consumption by the year 2020. In its reference case, EIA also assumes an 80 percent increase in Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) oil production over the same time period. In contrast to this, a popular world oil market projection model demonstrates that OPEC could increase its production profitability significantly by substantially slowing the rate of its expanded production. However, OPEC’s potential market control also is influenced by the prospective availability of fuels produced from natural gas, especially remote unconventional natural gas resources. The unconventional natural gas resource is potentially enormous compared with all other fossil fuels combined. Considerations of energy security, greenhouse gas curtailment, emissions control, and cost will act to dictate widespread production and use of these unconventional reserves. Estimates are provided for the amount of alternatives that might be available at various oil prices. Because of cost considerations, much of this added production is likely to occur outside the United States.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. International Energy Outlook 1999. Report DOE/EIA–0484 (99). Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, March 1999.
2. Gately D. Strategies for OPEC’s Pricing and Output Decisions. The Energy Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1995.
3. Gately D. World Oil Market. Presentation to the U.S. Department of Energy, New York University, June 3, 1999.
4. International Energy Outlook 1997. Report DOE/EIA–0484 (97). Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, 1997.
5. Hubbert M. K. Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels. In Drilling and Production Practice, American Petroleum Institute, 1956.
6. Gever J., Kaufmann R., Skole D., and Vörösmarty C. Beyond Oil: The Threat to Food and Fuel in the Coming Decades. Complex Systems Research Center, University of New Hampshire; University Press of Colorado, 1991.
7. Rogner H. H. An Assessment of World Hydrocarbon Resources. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, Vol. 22, 1997, pp. 217–262.
8. Office of Transportation Technologies U.S. Department of Energy. http://www.ott.doe.gov. Accessed Nov. 16, 1999.
9. Norton P. Raley’s LNG Truck Fleet Start-Up Experience Alternative Truck Evaluation Project. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Washington, D.C., 1997.
10. Greene D. L. Costs and Benefits of Increased Use of Natural Gas Derived Liquid Fuels in the U.S. Transportation Sector (Draft). Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., Feb. 1999.
11. Remote Gas Strategies. Zeus Development Corporation, July 17, 1999.
12. Wang M. Q., and Huang H. S. A Full-Cycle Analysis of Energy and Emissions Impacts of Transportation Fuels Produced from Natural Gas (Draft). Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill., April 20, 1999.
13. VerticalNet, Inc. Ultra-Clean Fuels Initiative Could Aid GTL Development. Gas-to-Liquids News, Vol. 2, No. 10, Oct. 21, 1999 (via Pollution Online, http://www.pollutiononline.com).
14. Wang M. Q., Mintz M., Singh M., Stork K., Vyas A., and Johnson L. Assessment of PNGV Fuels Infrastructure Phase 2 Report: Additional Capital Needs and Fuel-Cycle Energy and Emissions Impacts. Report ANL/ESD-37. Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill., Aug. 1998.
15. Wang M. Q. GREET 1.5—Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model. Report ANL/ESD-39, Vols. 1 and 2. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill., Aug. 1999.
16. Hall D. O., Rosillo-Calle F., Williams R. H., and Woods J. Biomass for Energy: Supply Prospects. In Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity (Johansson T. B., Kelly H., Reddy A. K. N., and Williams R. H., eds.), Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 593–651.
17. Program Analysis Methodology: Quality Metrics 2001 (Draft). Office of Transportation Technologies Laboratory Analytic Team, U.S. Department of Energy, Oct. 21, 1999.
18. Salpukas A. An Oil Outsider Revives a Cartel. New York Times, Oct. 24, 1999.
19. Energy Information Administration U.S. Department of Energy. Monthly Energy Review. http://www.eia.doe.gov/mer. Accessed Nov. 15, 1999.
20. Monthly Energy Review. Report DOE/EIA-0035(99/09). Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Sept. 1999.
21. Annual Energy Outlook. Report DOE/EIA-0383(99). Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Dec. 1998.
22. Greene D. L. Energy Security and Environmental Issues for Gasto-Liquid Distillate Fuels. Presentation to Office of Transportation Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy, Nov. 17, 1999.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2000
Issue published: January 2000

Rights and permissions

© 2000 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alicia K. Birky
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 409 12th Street, SW, Suite 710, Washington, DC 20024
John D. Maples
TRANCON, Inc., 2331 Putnam Lane, Crofton, MD 21114
James S. Moore, Jr.
TA Engineering, Inc., (Argonne National Laboratory), 405 Frederick Road, Suite 252, Baltimore, MD 21228
Philip D. Patterson
Office of Transportation Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 14

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub