Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2000

Optimization of Tack Coat Application Rate for Geocomposite Membrane on Bridge Decks

Abstract

One of the critical components of the U.S. civil infrastructure, bridges, has rapidly deteriorated in the past two decades and is in need of maintenance and rehabilitation. Geosynthetics may have the potential to provide a long-term solution to some of the problems that are present in these bridges, mainly, chloride intrusion into bridge decks. When installed properly, geosynthetics can act as both a moisture barrier and a stress absorption layer. However, the tack coat application rate is critical, as an excessive amount can cause eventual slippage, whereas too little may result in debonding. A new geocomposite membrane that comprises a low-modulus polyvinyl chloride layer sandwiched between two layers of nonwoven geotextile has recently been introduced for use in highway systems for water impermeation and strain energy absorption. A laboratory testing program was conducted to determine the optimum asphalt binder tack coat application rate that needs to be applied in the field. To accomplish this, a fixture was designed to allow the application of cyclic shear loading at the geocomposite membrane interface when used as an interlayer simulating a concrete bridge deck overlaid with the geocomposite membrane and a hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlay. The study concluded that 1.75 kg of PG 64-22 binder per m2 is an optimum value to achieve excellent bonding and minimum slippage potential. For the upper surface in contact with a wearing surface mix, a tack coat application rate of 1.5 kg/m2 may be used. When the geocomposite membrane was included between concrete and HMA, failure occurred after a much larger number of applied loading cycles than the number of loading cycles to failure when the geocomposite was absent. In addition, the slope of shear stress versus the number of loading cycles at failure was much greater when the geocomposite was absent.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. DiMaggio J. A., and Cribbs M. M. The Role of Geosynthetics on USA Highways. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 14, No. 5–6, June–July 1996, pp. 243–251.
2. Fluet J. Jr. Geosynthetics for Soil Improvement: A General Report and Keynote Address. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 18. ASCE, Nashville, Tenn., 1988, pp. 1–21.
3. Scuero A., and Vaschetti G. L. Polyvinyl Chloride Geocomposites as a Barrier to Seepage and Deterioration of Old and New Dams. Proc., Geosynthetics Asia, Bangalore, India, Nov. 1997.
4. Mehta P. K., and Monteiro P. J. M. Concrete: Structure, Properties and Materials. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993.
5. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 57: Durability of Concrete Bridge Decks. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., May 1979.
6. Frascoia R. I. Performance of Waterproofing Membranes on New and Rehabilitated Bridge Decks. Agency of Transportation, State of Vermont, Montpellier, 1987.
7. Frascoia R. I. Performance of Waterproofing Membranes on Chloride Contaminated Bridge Decks. Interim Report No. 90-3. Materials and Research Division, Agency of Transportation, State of Vermont, Montpellier, Feb. 1990.
8. Al-Qadi I. L., Weyers R. E., and Cady P. D. Field Evaluation of Preformed Membranes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 2, March–April 1993, pp. 284–300.
9. Al-Qadi I. L., Weyers R. E., Galagedera N. L., and Cady P. D. Condition Evaluation of Concrete Bridges Relative to Reinforcement Corrosion, Vol. 4. Deck Membrane Effectiveness and a Method for Evaluating Membrane Integrity. SHRP-S/FR-92-106. Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C., 1992.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2000
Issue published: January 2000

Rights and permissions

© 2000 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Erin P. Donovan
Charles Edward Via, Jr., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 200 Patton Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Imad L. Al-Qadi
Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 3500 Transportation Research Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Amara Loulizi
Anderson & Associates, Inc., 100 Ardmore Street, Blacksburg, VA 24060

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 41

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 28

  1. Laboratory Investigation on the Use of Geocomposites as Waterproofing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The development and application of an interfacial cohesive zone model ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Enhancing Shear Strength of Bonding Materials Used for Asphalt Concret...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Mechanical characterisation of interface shear strain of multi-layer c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A new proposal to assess shear fatigue resistance of asphalt pavement ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Optimisation and field assessment of poroelastic wearing course bond q...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Investigation of interlayer shear failure of concrete bridge deck asph...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Laboratory Investigation on the Interface Bonding between Portland Cem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Comparison of Two Typical Professional Programs for Mechanical Analysi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Shear-Torque Fatigue Performance of Geogrid-Reinforced Asphalt Interla...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Evaluation of the effective parameters on shear resistance of interfac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Evaluation of factors affecting tack coat bond strength
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Evaluation of geocomposite-reinforced bituminous pavements with Amirka...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Effective parameters on interface failure in a geocomposite reinforced...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Fatigue investigation on asphalt mixture layers’ interface
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Application of tack coat in pavement engineering
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Evaluation of shear bonding and reflective crack propagation in a geoc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. State-of-the-art review of interface bond testing devices for pavement...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Dilatancy in the Analysis of Interlayer Cyclic Shear Test Results
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Dynamic tests on bituminous layers interface
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Prediction of Fatigue Failure at Asphalt Concrete Layer Interface from...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Importance of Normal Confinement to Shear Bond Failure of Interface in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Shear- and Tension-Type Tests to Evaluate Bonding of Hot-Mix Asphalt L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Comparison between Optimum Tack Coat Application Rates as Obtained fro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Interface Bonding between Hot-Mix Asphalt and various Portland Cement ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Interface Bonding between Hot-Mix Asphalt and Various Portland Cement ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Modeling of Strain Energy Absorbers for Rehabilitated Cracked Flexible...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Performance of Geocomposite Membrane as Pavement Moisture Barrier
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub