Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2001

W-Beam Guardrail Adjacent to a Slope

Abstract

A W-beam guardrail system was developed and successfully crash tested for use on a 2:1 foreslope. The guardrail design was constructed with W-beam rails 2.66 mm thick (12 gauge) totaling 53.34 m in length, and it incorporated a half-post spacing section of 17.15 m. The W-beam rail was supported by 15 W150 × 13.5 steel posts 1829 mm long, spaced 1905 mm on center, and 19 W150 × 13.5 steel posts 2134 mm long, spaced 952.5 mm on center. Routed, 150 × 200 × 360 mm wood spacer blockouts were used to block the rail away from each post. The research study included bogie testing on steel posts placed in sloped fill, computer simulation modeling with BARRIER VII, and one full-scale vehicle crash test, using a 2000-kg pickup truck. The test, impacting at a speed of 100.7 km/h and an angle of 28.5 degrees, was conducted and reported in accordance with the Test Level 3 (TL-3) requirements specified in NCHRP Report 350. The safety performance of the W-beam barrier system was determined to be acceptable according to TL-3 criteria.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Stout D., Hinch J., and Yang T.-L. Force-Deflection Characteristics of Guardrail Posts. Report FHWA-RD-88-195. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1988.
2. Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 230: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981.
3. Ross H. E., Sicking D. L., Zimmer R. A., and Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
4. Polivka K. A., Faller R. K., Sicking D. L., Rohde J. R., Holloway J. C., and Keller E. A. Development of a W-beam Guardrail System for Use on a 2:1 Slope. Transportation Report TRP-03-99-00. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 2000.
5. Buth C. E., Campise W. L., Griffin L. I. III, Love M. L., and Sicking D. L. Performance Limits of Longitudinal Barrier Systems, Volume 1, Summary Report. Report FHWA/RD-86/153. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1986.
6. Ivey D. L., Robertson R., and Buth C. E. Test and Evaluation of W-Beam and Thrie-Beam Guardrails. Report FHWA/RD-82/071. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1986.
7. Ross H. E. Jr., Perera H. S., Sicking D. L., and Bligh R. P. NCHRP Report 318: Roadside Safety Design for Small Vehicles. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989.
8. Hargrave M. W., and Hansen A. G. Federal Outdoor Impact Laboratory—A New Facility for Evaluating Roadside Safety Hardware. In Transportation Research Record 1198, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 90–96.
9. Powell G. H. BARRIER VII: A Computer Program for Evaluation of Automobile Barrier Systems. Report FHWA RD-73-51. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1973.
10. Buth C. E., Menges W. L., Ivey D. L., and Williams W. F. W-Beam Guardrail. Presented at 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2001
Issue published: January 2001

Rights and permissions

© 2001 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Karla A. Polivka
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1901 Y Street, Building C, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, NE 68588-0601
Ronald K. Fallen
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1901 Y Street, Building C, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, NE 68588-0601
Dean L. Sicking
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, W328.1 Nebraska Hall, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, NE 68588-0529
John R. Rohde
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, W328.1 Nebraska Hall, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Lincoln, NE 68588-0529

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 8

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Standard Midwest Guardrail System Placed at 1V:2H Slope Break Point or...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Application of Precast Concrete Barrier Adjacent to Steep Roadside Slo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Midwest Guardrail System Adjacent to a 2:1 Slope
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub