Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2001

Injury Severity in Multivehicle Rear-End Crashes

Abstract

Rear-end crashes constitute a substantial portion of the total crashes in the United States. They are also amenable to reduction through emerging intelligent transportation systems technologies such as crash warning systems. A specific objective was to analyze the effect of information and vehicle technology on injury severity in rear-end crashes, while controlling for the effects of driver, vehicle, and roadway factors. The study is based on real-life data from the Highway Safety Information System for North Carolina access-controlled roadways. The results show that in two-vehicle crashes the leading driver is more severely injured, whereas in three-vehicle crashes the driver in the middle is more severely injured. To analyze injury severity on the KABCO scale, three separate ordered probit models were estimated for Drivers 1 (leading), 2 (striking), and 3 (striking, in a three-vehicle crash). A vehicle age variable was used in the model specification to capture the effect of vehicle age and to serve as a proxy for safety improvements, in particular the center high-mounted stoplight (CHMSL). The modeling results show that being in a newer vehicle protects the driver in rear-end collisions. Similarly, being in a newer vehicle protects Driver 2. Interestingly, striking a newer Vehicle 1 can reduce the chance of both Driver 2 and Driver 3 injuries, partly as a result of CHMSL on Vehicle 1. Also examined is whether drivers of vans, pickup trucks, and station wagon cars/trucks sustain less-severe injuries because of their larger vehicle mass or more-severe injuries because of their information-blocking effect. The results show that technological improvements have a quantifiable beneficial effect on safety.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Kahane C., and Hertz E. The Long-Term Effectiveness of Center High Mounted Stop Lamps in Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. Report DOT-HS-808-696, NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.
2. Farmer C. Effectiveness Estimates for Center High Mounted Stop Lamps: A Six-Year Study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1996, pp. 201–208.
3. Knipling R. A Front-End Analysis of Rear-End Crashes: Surface Transportation and the Information Age, Vol. 2. IVHS America, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 733–745.
4. Farber E. Modelling Rear-End Collisions and Countermeasures. ITS Australia, Victoria, Australia, 1995, pp. 327–340.
5. Beymer B., and Hochnadel R. Chained Information Systems: An Aid to Prevent Rear-End Collisions. Presented at 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1994.
6. O′Donnell C., and Connor D. Predicting the Severity of Motor Vehicle Accident Injuries Using Models of Ordered Multiple Choice. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 6, 1996, pp. 739–753.
7. Evans L. Traffic Safety and the Driver. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991.
8. Kahane C. An Evaluation of Center High Mounted Stop Lamps Based on 1987 Data. Report DOT-HS-807-442, NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1989.
9. Popkin C., Campbell B., Hansen A., and Stewart J. Analysis of the Accuracy of the Existing KABCO Injury Scale. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1991.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2001
Issue published: January 2001

Rights and permissions

© 2001 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Asad J. Khattak
Carolina Transportation Program, Department of City and Regional Planning, 3140 New East Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 153

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 71

  1. Injury-Based Surrogate Resilience Measure: Assessing the Post-Crash Tr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Exploring the temporal variability of the factors affecting driver inj...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Contributing factors to right-turn crash severity at signalized inters...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Tendency of intra-city bus drivers to use cell phone while driving usi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Exploring the need to model severity of single- and multi-occupant veh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Evaluating the impact of traffic violations on crash injury severity o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Bayesian spatial analysis of crash severity data with the INLA approac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Variance-based global sensitivity analysis for rear-end crash investig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Exploring the Need to Model Two- and Multiple-Vehicle Crashes Separate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Accident Severity on National Highways in the Presence of Liquor Shop:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Effect of daily car-following behaviors on urban roadway rear-end cras...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Investigating the severity of expressway crash based on the random par...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Analysis of head-on crash injury severity using a partial proportional...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Fusion convolutional neural network-based interpretation of unobserved...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Full Bayesian Before-After Analysis of Safety Effects of Variable Spee...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Summary of crash-frequency and crash-severity models in highway safety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Analysis of the impacts of risk factors on teenage and older driver in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Exploring the Injury Severity Risk Factors in Fatal Crashes with Neura...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. A Bayesian modeling framework for crash severity effects of active tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Temporal stability of the factors related to the severity of drivers’ ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Understanding how drivers are injured in rear-end collisions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Exploring injury severity in head-on crashes using latent class cluste...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. A Random Parameters Ordered Probit Analysis of Injury Severity in Truc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Injury Severity and Contributing Driver Actions in Passenger Vehicle–T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Analytical observational study of nonfatal motor vehicle collisions an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Investigating Factors Contributing to Injury Severity in Work Zone Rea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Modeling head-on crash severity on NCDOT freeways: a mixed logit model...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Investigation of driver injury severities in rural single-vehicle cras...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Crash severity effects of adaptive signal control technology: An empir...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. What factors results in having a severe crash? a closer look on distra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Evaluating Factors Influencing the Severity of Three-Plus Multiple-Veh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Machine Learning Methods to Analyze Injury Severity of Drivers from Di...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Evaluating temporal variability of exogenous variable impacts over 25 ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Analysis of Work-Zone Crashes Using the Ordered Probit Model with Fact...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Surface condition and safety at signalised intersections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. A random thresholds random parameters hierarchical ordered probit anal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. HOW USUAL BEHAVIOUR CAN AFFECT PERCEIVED DRIVERS’ PSYCHOLOGICAL STATE ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Key factors contributing to crash severity at highway-rail grade cross...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Willingness to use mobile application for smartphone for improving roa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Differences in Injury Severities Between 2-Vehicle and 3-Vehicle Crash...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Classification modeling approach for vehicle dynamics model-integrated...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. How to identify the key factors that affect driver perception of accid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Pedestrian at-fault crashes on rural and urban roadways in Alabama
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Comprehensive analysis of single- and multi-vehicle large truck at-fau...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and fut...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. A latent segmentation based generalized ordered logit model to examine...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Reprint of “Modeling two-vehicle crash severity by a bivariate general...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Injury severity models for motor vehicle accidents: a review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Effect of driver’s age and side of impact on crash severity along urba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Safety impacts of signal-warning flashers and speed control at high-sp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Modeling two-vehicle crash severity by a bivariate generalized ordered...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: A review ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Pedestrian injury analysis with consideration of the selectivity bias ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. The effects of road-surface conditions, age, and gender on driver-inju...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. An empirical assessment of fixed and random parameter logit models usi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Potential risk of using General Estimates System: Bicycle safety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Right-Angle Crash Injury Severity Analysis Using Ordered Probability M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Model-Based Application of Abbreviated Injury Scale to Police-Reported...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Fatality Risk of Intersection Crashes on Rural Undivided Highways in A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Empirical assessment of the impact of highway design exceptions on the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Markov switching multinomial logit model: An application to accident-i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Underreporting in traffic accident data, bias in parameters and the st...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Effect of Increases in Speed Limits on Severities of Injuries in Accid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: An exploratory ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Accident severity analysis using ordered probit model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Probabilistic models of motorcyclists’ injury severities in single- an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Factors contributing to the severity of intersection crashes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Driver aging and its effect on male and female single-vehicle accident...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Characteristics of rear-end accidents at signalized intersections usin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Bivariate ordered-response probit model of driver’s and passenger’s in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Reliability of Police-Reported Information for Determining Crash and I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub