Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2002

Whose Railroad Is This, Anyway?: Opportunities and Challenges in Regionalizing the Northeast Corridor

Abstract

The Northeast Corridor (NEC) is a regional asset that is planned, funded, and operated by a national institution—the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak). This asymmetry may prevent the NEC from realizing its potential. Despite completion of the Northeast High-Speed Rail Improvement Project, the NEC will require massive investments in coming years. The historical funding pattern—via annual appropriations from the U.S. Congress—is unlikely to meet these needs. Regional funding sources may be able to provide sustained funding; this approach is closer to the state or local funding plus federal match regime that prevails in other modes and is expected to be used for new passenger rail corridors. A regional partnership might allow better planning for the Northeast’s long-term rail infrastructure needs and for NEC services; it might also provide a channel through which the region could assist Amtrak in funding additional frequency or lowering fares. Amtrak’s successful state partnerships, particularly with California, provide models for a regional partnership. The key problem is that in the Northeast no single government can address transportation at a regional level. As a result, an integrated partnership for Amtrak would likely require the creation of a regional entity for the corridor. Through its funding abilities, this entity could resolve the dilemma that exists today: Amtrak must preserve its national constituency and support, and the states fear losing access to federal funding. Significantly, resolving this dilemma does not necessitate any change in Amtrak’s current largely unified operation of the railroad.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The MTA Network. http://www.mta.nyc.ny.us/mta/network.htm. Accessed July 26, 2006.
2. Amtrak Reform Council. Second Annual Report. Amtrak, Washington, D.C., March 20, 2001.
3. Transportation Research Circular 490: Research Problem Statements on Intercity Passenger Rail. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1999.
4. Dunn J. A. Jr., and Perl A. Toward a “New Model Railway” for the 21 st Century: Lessons from Five Countries. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 2, Spring 2001. pp. 43–57.
5. Northeast Corridor South End Transportation Plan: Amtrak Letter Report to Congress. Amtrak, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2000.
6. New Jersey Transit Corporation. 2000 Annual Report. http://www.njtransit.com/an_corporateinfo_annualreport.shtm. Accessed May 7, 2002.
7. Access to the Region’s Core. http://www.accesstotheregionscore.com. Accessed July 26, 2001.
8. Massachusetts Sierra Club. North-South Rail Link. http://www.sierra-clubmass.org/issues/north_south_rail_link/main.html. Accessed May 7, 2002.
9. FRA, U.S. Department of Transportation. New York State’s Role in High-Speed Rail. http://www.fra.dot.gov/rdv/hsgt/hsgtcorridors/ny2.htm. Accessed May 7, 2002.
10. FAA, U.S. Department of Transportation. OPSNET Ranking Report, 2000. http://www.faa.gov/apa/55arpts.xls. Accessed July 26, 2001.
11. High-Speed Ground Transportation for America. FRA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997. p. 8–3.
12. Amtrak. Amtrak California Passenger Rail Study. http://www.amtrakwest.com/califuture/index.html. Accessed July 26, 2001.
13. Doig J. W. Empire on the Hudson: Entrepreneurial Vision and Political Power at the Port of New York Authority. Columbia University Press, New York, 2001.
14. Wilbur Smith Associates. Challenges with Multi-State/Jurisdictional Transportation Issues. White paper prepared for FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations, Office of Intermodal and Statewide Programs, May 2001.
15. Council of State Governments Midwest Office, High-Speed Rail Task Force. The Midwest Interstate Passenger Rail Compact. http://www.csgmidwest.org/MLC/committees/rail_compact.pdf. Accessed July 26, 2001.
16. I-95 Corridor Coalition. About the Coalition. http://www.I95coalition.org/about.htm. Accessed July 26, 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2002
Issue published: January 2002

Rights and permissions

© 2002 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Daniel L. Roth
144-33 72nd Road, Flushing, NY 11367
Rohit T. Aggarwala
Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University, Mail Code 3355, New York, NY 10027

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 26

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Characteristics of Effective Collaboration in Response to Diversified ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Survey of Current High-Speed Rail Planning Efforts in the United State...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub