Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2002

Washington State Ferries’ Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Analysis Programs: A 10-Year Perspective

Abstract

Recent Washington State Ferries (WSF) origin–destination travel survey data collection and model development activities are described. WSF performed similar activities in 1993. The lessons learned from the initial project helped to develop a better survey design and sampling plan. The overall survey response rate was 37%, about 28% higher than the response rate for the 1993 travel survey. The improved survey design and sampling plan also provided a richer data platform from which to establish more representative observed baseline ferry travel patterns, by boarding method and access and egress mode combinations. Compared with 1993, the 1999 travel survey results reflect a significant increase in the systemwide use of transit for access to and egress from ferry terminals. This increase was primarily attributed to improved transit service, timed ferry-bus connections, and ferry-bus passes implemented by Kitsap Transit and other transit agencies. In addition to the 1999 travel survey, WSF conducted a stated preference survey. The combined data from these two surveys provided information on ferry users’ revealed and stated preferences, which allowed a more rigorous statistical mode and route choice estimation analysis to be performed. This analysis helped develop a more robust and internally consistent model, as reflected in model performance. For walk-on and automobile-boarding passengers, the updated WSF model has produced more accurate route-level validation results than the previous model. The results from the model estimation and validation analyses are presented. Specific improvements made in the updated model are highlighted.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., and Pacific Rim Resources. Washington State Ferries 1993 O-D Surveys. Final Report. Washington State Ferries, Seattle, March 1994.
2. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., and RST International. Washington State Ferries Travel Forecasting Methodology Report. Washington State Ferries, Seattle, May 1996.
3. NuStats Research & Consulting. Washington State Ferries 1999 Travel Survey—Technical Report of Methods. Washington State Ferries, Seattle, May 2000.
4. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. Washington State Ferries 1999 Travel Survey Analysis & Results Report. Washington State Ferries, Seattle, June 2000.
5. NuStats, and Mark Bradley Research & Consulting. Washington State Ferries 1999 Stated Preference Survey. Final Report. Washington State Ferries, Seattle, June 20, 2000.
6. Thurston Regional Planning Council. Thurston Region Multimodal Travel Demand Forecasting Model Implementation in EMME/2. Presented at 15th International EMME/2 Users’ Group Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Sept. 18, 2000.
7. Dehghani Y., and Harvey R. Fully Incremental Model for Transit Rid-ership Forecasting: Seattle Experience. In Transportation Research Record 1452, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 52–61.
8. Dehghani Y., Saranathan K., and Gihring C. Comprehensive Planning Model for Ferry Ridership Forecasting Analysis in Puget Sound Region. In Transportation Research Record 1608, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 30–39.
9. EMME/2 User’s Manual, Software Release 9. INRO Consultants Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug. 31, 1998.
10. Bradley M. Results of WSF Mode and Route Choice Model Estimation. Technical Memorandum. Mark Bradley Research & Consulting, Fairfax, Calif., Feb. 2001.
11. Spiess H. Computing Activity Chain–Based Trip Distribution Models. EMME/2 Support Center, Aegerten, Switzerland, April 1995.
12. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas. Washington State Ferries Travel Forecasting Methodology (Draft) Report. Washington State Ferries, Seattle, March 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2002
Issue published: January 2002

Rights and permissions

© 2002 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Youssef Dehghani
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., 999 Third Avenue, Suite 2200, Seattle, WA 98104
Murli K. Adury
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., 999 Third Avenue, Suite 2200, Seattle, WA 98104
Mark Bradley
Mark Bradley Research & Consulting, 16 Mountain View Road, Fairfax, CA 94930
Celine K. Gihring
Washington State Ferries, 2991 Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 98121

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 33

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Predicting transit mode choice of New Jersey workers commuting to New ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Estimating demand for rural intercity bus services
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Vehicle traffic delay prediction in ferry terminal based on Bayesian m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. An Assessment of Demand for Rural Intercity Transportation Services in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Travel Demand Forecasting Analysis Challenges Supporting Washington St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Chapter 9 Demand Models for Greek Passenger Shipping
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub