Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2002

Comparison of Observed Retroreflectivity Values with Proposed FHWA Minimums

Abstract

Until recently, no federal guidance existed on the retroreflectivity of highway signs, and the replacement policy has been left to the discretion of local officials. FHWA has now published a proposed set of minimum retroreflectivity requirements for traffic signs. The proposed minimum retroreflectivity values published by FHWA were compared with retroreflectivity values observed from signs with ASTM Type III sheeting in the state of Indiana. Research found that approximately 4% of signs scheduled for removal in 2000 or 2001 were below the proposed FHWA minimums. Having different retroreflectivity minimums for different speeds and sign sizes unnecessarily complicates the proposed minimums. Using the single most conservative retroreflectivity value for each color would be sufficient.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Sessions G. M. Traffic Devices: Historical Aspects Thereof. Publ. HB-001. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 125–127.
2. Hawkins H. G., Carlson P. J., McCaleb J. B., and McIlroy C. R. Impact of Minimum Retroreflectivity Values on Sign Replacement Strategies. Report FHWA/TX-97/1275-1F. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1996.
3. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices: Millennium Edition. Dec. 18, 2000. http://www.mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/kno-millennium_12.18.00.htm. Accessed July 23, 2001.
4. McGee H. W., and Paniati J. A. An Implementation Guide for Minimum Retroreflectivity Requirements for Traffic Signs. Report FHWA-RD-97-052. Office of Safety and Traffic Operations R&D, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., April 1998, pp. 11–12.
5. Sign Master 920 SEL Operating Instructions. Advanced Retro Technology, Baltimore, Md., April 22, 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2002
Issue published: January 2002

Rights and permissions

© 2002 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Luke Nuber
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Darcy Bullock
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. LEGIBILITY OF URBAN HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNS USING NEW RETROREFLECTIVE MA...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub