Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2002

Assessment of NCHRP Report 350 Test Vehicles

Abstract

The appropriateness of test vehicles specified in NCHRP Report 350 was assessed, including (a) whether the 2000-kg, three-quarter-ton pickup truck should continue to be used as a test vehicle, and if not, what replacement vehicle would be appropriate; (b) whether the 820-kg passenger car should continue to be used as a test vehicle, and if not, what replacement vehicle would be appropriate; and (c) whether another test vehicle should be added to the matrix—for example, an intermediate-sized passenger car. From the analysis, the following conclusions and recommendations were drawn: (a) The three-quarter-ton pickup truck appears to be a good surrogate for the light truck subclasses. The recommendation is to keep the 2000-kg, three-quarter-ton pickup truck as one of the design test vehicles in the update of the guidelines for NCHRP Report 350. (b) A potential problem is the availability of three-quarter-ton pickup trucks with standard cabs. An alternative design test vehicle may be an intermediate-sized sport utility vehicle, (c) The availability of the 820-kg passenger car design test vehicle will be a problem within the next few years. The recommendation is to keep the current test vehicle as long as it is still readily available, or until the NCHRP Report 350 guidelines are updated, and to increase the curb weight to a level consistent with the curb weights of the two smallest passenger cars with reasonably high sales volume. (d) The addition of a third design vehicle—for example, a 1500-kg intermediate-sized passenger car—to ensure that a roadside feature performs satisfactorily across the entire vehicle spectrum is highly desirable but cost-prohibitive. The addition of an intermediate-sized design test vehicle is therefore not recommended except in situations in which there is a perceived concern that the device may not function properly when impacted by an intermediate-sized vehicle.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Ross H. E. Jr., Sicking D. L., Zimmer R. A., and Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
2. Mak K. K., Bligh R. P., Griffin L. I. III. Improvement of the Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Roadside Features. Final Report, NCHRP Project 22-14. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2000.
3. Ross H. E. Jr., Bligh R. P., and Mak K. K. Evaluation of Roadside Features to Accommodate Vans, Mini-Vans, Pickup Trucks, and Four-Wheel Drive Vehicles. Final Report, NCHRP Project 22-11. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2000.
4. Bligh R. P., Mak K. K., Ross H. E. Jr., and Miaou S.-P. Assessment of Vehicle Characteristics. Final Report, FHWA Contract No. DTFH61-94-C-00152. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2001.
5. Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 230: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981.
6. Automotive News Market Data Book 2001. Crain Communications, Inc. Detroit, Mich., 2001.
7. Bligh R. P., Mak K. K., Ross H. E. Jr., and Miaou S. Assessment of Vehicle Characteristics. Report FHWA-RD-01-032. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2002
Issue published: January 2002

Rights and permissions

© 2002 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

King K. Mak
9 Cotswold Lane, San Antonio, TX 78257
Roger P. Bligh
Roadside Safety Program, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX 77843-3135

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 17

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub