Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2002

Uncertainty Analysis for a Seismic Warning System

Abstract

Following the collapse of the Cypress structure, which killed 42 people in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) initiated a series of studies of the seismic vulnerability of the Alaskan Way Viaduct (AWV). The AWV, which carries nearly 100,000 vehicles per day, is one of only two north–south highways through downtown Seattle. The studies showed that this double-deck structure is vulnerable to extensive damage during and shortly after strong earthquake shaking. The structural vulnerabilities, associated with reinforced concrete details typical of 1950s construction, are exacerbated by the presence of highly liquefiable soils beneath the AWV, and by the seismic vulnerability of a seawall that is located immediately west of the AWV. To make decisions about closing the viaduct during or after an earthquake, WSDOT will need to have reliable and timely information about the likelihood of potential damage. To this end, a study was undertaken to develop design requirements for an instrumentation system that would detect the onset of soil liquefaction and provide input to a collapse warning system. Given the uncertainties associated with predictions of ground-shaking intensity, site response, liquefaction, and structural performance, it is difficult to predict levels of damage accurately. Therefore, an important part of this study was the identification and quantification of sources of uncertainty that needed to be considered in the development of a criterion for collapse potential. A framework based on the total probability theorem was developed to evaluate the probabilities of failure. For each source, a conditional probability distribution function was developed across the anticipated range in values. The results take the form of probabilities of liquefaction-induced collapse as a function of triggering criteria.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Eberhard M. O., De la Colina J., and Ryter S. Seismic Vulnerability of the Alaskan Way Viaduct: WSDOT Typical Unit. Report WA-RD 363.1. Washington State Department of Transportation, 1995.
2. Knaebel P., Eberhard M. O., and De la Colina J. Seismic Vulnerability of the Alaskan Way Viaduct: SED Typical Unit. Report WA-RD 363.3. Washington State Department of Transportation, 1995.
3. Kramer S. L., Sivaneswaran N., and Tucker K. Seismic Vulnerability of the Alaskan Way Viaduct: Geotechnical Engineering Aspects. Report WA-RD 363.2. Washington State Department of Transportation, 1995.
4. Kimmerling R. E., and Kramer S. Alaskan Way Viaduct: Phase III Seismic Vulnerability Study, Geotechnical Report. Washington State Department of Transportation, 1996.
5. Kayen R. E., and Mitchell J. Assessment of Liquefaction Potential During Earthquakes by Arias Intensity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 12, 1997, pp. 1162–1174.
6. Horne J. C. Effects of Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading on Pile Foundations. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Washington, 1996.
7. Seed R. B., and Harder L. F. SPT-Based Analysis of Cyclic Pore Pressure Generation and Undrained Residual Strength. Proc., H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symposium, University of California, Berkeley, Vol. 2, 1990, pp. 351–376.
8. Arduino P., Kramer S., Li P., and Baska D. Dynamic Stiffness of Piles in Liquefiable Soils. Report WA-RD 514.1. Washington State Department of Transportation, 2001.
9. Nogami T., Otani J., Konagai K., and Chen H. L. Nonlinear Soil-pile Interaction Model for Dynamic Lateral Motion. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 1, 1992, pp. 89–116.
10. O’Neill M., and Murchison J. M. An Evaluation of p-y Relationships in Sands. Research Report No. GT-DF02-83. University of Houston–University Park, Tex., 1983.
11. De la Colina J., Eberhard M. O., Ryter S., and Wood S. L. Sensitivity of Seismic Assessment of a Double-deck, Reinforced Concrete Bridge. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 12, No. 2, May 1996, pp. 217–244.
12. Eberhard M. O., and Parrish M. Accuracy of Performance Estimates for Reinforced Concrete Columns. Proc., U.S.–Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Seattle, 2001.
13. Priestley M. J. N., Seible F., and Chai Y. H. Design Guidelines for Assessment Retrofit and Repair of Bridges for Seismic Performance. Report SSRP-92/01. Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 1992.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2002
Issue published: January 2002

Rights and permissions

© 2002 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Allen L. Jones
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195
Steven L. Kramer
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195
Pedro Arduino
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195
Marc Eberhard
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 7

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Acoustic emission induced by sand liquefaction during vibration loadin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub