Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2002

Evaluation of Traffic Flow Analysis Tools Applied to Work Zones Based on Flow Data Collected in the Field

Abstract

The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) has identified the maintenance of traffic (MOT) as a top priority to serve the motoring public as part of a department strategic initiative. A key component of this strategy is to ensure that traffic flows efficiently through work zones. Work is described that was performed for ODOT to determine whether commercially available traffic simulation models could be calibrated to yield accurate queue length and delay time predictions for planning purposes in freeway work zones. Four work zones on multilane freeways were selected by ODOT for collection of the calibration data. Traffic flow video records were obtained at the four selected work zones by two ODOT video recording vans equipped with 15-m masts. Traffic flow parameters were extracted from the video records with the Mobilizer-PC software package. The traffic simulation and prediction tools investigated included the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), Synchro, CORSIM (under ITRAF and TRAFVU), NetSim, and a macroscopic model called QueWZ92. Simulation models were constructed with all models for the selected work zones, and the simulated queue lengths and delay times were compared with the data extracted from the field data with Mobilizer-PC. The results of this study indicated that the microscopic simulation packages could not be calibrated to the oversaturated conditions that existed at the work zones. The calibrated microscopic simulation packages underestimated the length of the queues that formed in the real world. The macroscopic QueWZ92 produced more accurate estimates than did the microscopic packages.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Schnell T., Mohror J. S., and Aktan F. Evaluation of Traffic Flow Analysis Tools Applied to Work Zones Based on Flow Data Collected in the Field. FHWA Report FHWA/HWA-2001/08. Final Report Submitted to ODOT, May 2001.
2. Memmott J. L., and Dudek C. L. Queue and User Cost Evaluation of Work Zones (QUEWZ). In Transportation Research Record 979, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 12–19.
3. Dudek C. L., Richards S. H., and Buffington J. L. Some Effects of Traffic Control on Four-Lane Divided Highways. In Transportation Research Record 1086, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 20–30.
4. Schonfeld P., and Chien S. Optimal Work Zone Lengths for Two-Lane Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 125, Jan./Feb., 1999, pp. 21–29.
5. Cassidy M. J., and Han L. D. Proposed Model for Predicting Motorist Delays at Two-Lane Highway Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 119, Jan./Feb. 1993, pp. 27–41.
6. Carr R. I. Construction Congestion Cost (CO3) Basic Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, March/April, 2000, pp. 105–113.
7. Smith B. L., and Demetsky M. J. Traffic Flow Forecasting: Comparison of Modeling Approaches. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 123, July/Aug., 1997, pp. 261–266.
8. Golias J., and Tsamboulas D. Macrolevel Estimation of Highway Lane Usage. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 121, Jan./Feb., 1995, pp. 40–49.
9. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual, 3rd ed. (1997 update). TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
10. Rouphail N. M., and Tiwari G. Flow Characteristics at Freeway Lane Closures. In Transportation Research Record 1035, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 50–58.
11. Krammes R., and Lopez G. Updated Short-Term Freeway Work Zone Lane Closure Capacity Values. FHWA/TX-92/1108-5. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Sept. 1992.
12. Smilowitz K. R., Daganzo C. E., Cassidy M. J., and Bertini R. L. Some Observations of Highway Traffic in Long Queues. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1678, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 225–233.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2002
Issue published: January 2002

Rights and permissions

© 2002 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thomas Schnell
Operator Performance Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering, 4325 Seamans Center
Jeffrey S. Mohror
National Advanced Driving Simulator; University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-2527
Fuat Aktan
Operator Performance Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering, 4325 Seamans Center

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 38

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 16

  1. Development and Evaluation of Statistical and Machine-Learning Models ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Identifying the Impact Area of a Traffic Event Through k-Means Cluster...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Driving Risk Analysis and Evaluation in Rightward Zone of Expressw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Upgrading the FHWA Work Zone Model Version 2.0 and Validating Its Perf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS IN A ONE-LANE ROADWORK ZONE
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Validating the Performance of the FHWA Work Zone Model Version 1.0: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Quantifying non-recurrent traffic congestion caused by freeway work zo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Analytical Methods for Deriving Work Zone Capacities from Field Data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Interactive Lane Closure and Traffic Information Tool Based on a Geogr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Work Zones as a Series of Bottlenecks...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Assessment of non-recurrent traffic congestion caused by freeway work ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Multivariate regression for estimating driving behavior parameters in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Cellular Automata Model for Work Zone Traffic
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Development of Traffic Delay Assessment Tool for Short-Term Closures o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Approximated Headway Distributions of Free-Flowing Traffic on Ohio Fre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Dynamic Late Merge Control at Highway Work Zones...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub