Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2002

Smoothness Provision for Bridge Decks

Abstract

A contemporary survey of bridge ride quality is described, and use of the survey to support the development of a modern smoothness provision for bridge decks is discussed. The survey found that bridges have an average of 60% more roughness than most mainline highway pavements [as measured by use of the international roughness index (IRI)]. However, a secondary analysis revealed that beam and girder camber can easily contribute more than 1000 mm/km of additional IRI roughness, which suggests that IRI may not be an equitable tool for measurement of the construction quality of bridges. This finding led to an additional analysis that focused on the use of a simulated rolling straightedge as a tool to control smoothness. Ultimately, the study demonstrated how inertial (and high-speed) profiling equipment can be applied to control bridge deck roughness through the use of a simulation that mimics the traditional 3-m straightedge.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bryant R. V., ed. Along the Road: Smooth Pavement Is Tops. Public Roads, Spring 1997, p. 48.
2. Road and Bridge Specifications. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, 1998.
3. Sayers M. W. On the Calculation of International Roughness Index from Longitudinal Road Profile. In Transportation Research Record 1501, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 1–12.
4. Sayers M. W., and Karamihas S. M. The Little Book of Profiling. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 1997.
5. Sayers M. W. Profiles of Roughness. In Transportation Research Record 1260, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 106–111.
6. McGhee K. K. Measuring, Achieving, and Promoting Smoothness of Virginia’s Asphalt Overlays. Report VTRC 99-R19. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1999.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2002
Issue published: January 2002

Rights and permissions

© 2002 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin K. McGhee
Virginia Transportation Research Council, 530 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Road vehicle shock detection algorithm using the Hilbert envelope
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub