Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2003

Propagation of Uncertainty in Transportation Land Use Models: Investigation of DRAM-EMPAL and UTPP Predictions in Austin, Texas

Abstract

Propagation of uncertainty in outputs of a standard integrated model of transportation and land use has been examined. Austin-calibrated DRAM-EMPAL predictions of residence and work locations were used as inputs to a UTPP-type four-step travel demand model, and the resulting travel times were fed forward into the future period’s land use models. Covariance in inputs (including model parameters and demographic variables) was accommodated through multivariate Monte Carlo sampling of 200 scenarios. Variances in land use and travel predictions were analyzed over time and as a function of input values. Results indicate that output variations were most sensitive to the exponent of the link performance function, the split of trips between peak and off-peak, and several trip generation and attraction rates. Twenty years in the future, final uncertainty levels (as measured by coefficients of variation) solely due to input and parameter estimation errors are on the order of 38% for total regional peak-period vehicle miles traveled (VMT), 45% for peak-period flows, and 50% and 37% for residential and employment densities, respectively. This means central point estimates of key model outputs are very likely (>30%) to fall 38% to 50% below or above the mean value. In the Austin example, 15% of the region’s 200 simulated peak-period VMT estimates fell below 3.7 million mi per day and 15% exceeded 8.4 million mi. Such substantial variation is solely due to standard model parameter and input uncertainties. Other uncertainty about the future and about human behavior exists and will add more variation.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Pradhan A., and Kockelman K. M. Uncertainty Propagation in an Integrated Land Use–Transportation Modeling Framework: Output Variation via UrbanSim. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 128–135.
2. Rodier C. J., and Johnston R. A. Uncertain Socioeconomic Projections Used in Travel and Emission Models: Could Plausible Errors Result in Air Quality Nonconformity? Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
3. Zhao Y., and Kockelman K. M. The Propagation of Uncertainty Through Travel Demand Models: An Exploratory Analysis. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2002, pp. 145–163.
4. Mahmassani H. S. Uncertainty in Transportation Systems Evaluation: Issues and Approaches. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 9, 1984, pp. 1–12.
5. Barton-Aschman Associates Inc. and Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual. Report FHWA-EP-01-023. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
6. Mehndiratta S. R., Brand D., and Parody T. E. How Transportation Planners and Decision Makers Address Risk and Uncertainty. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1706, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 46–53.
7. Keeney R. L., and Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1993.
8. Putman S. Integrated Urban Models: Policy Analysis of Transportation and Land Use. Pion, London, 1983.
9. Thompson D., Baker M., and Wade D. Conformity: Long-Term Prognoses for Selected Ozone Nonattainment Areas in California. In Transportation Research Record 1587, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 44–51.
10. Harvey G., and Deakin E. Description of the STEP Analysis Package. Working Paper. Berkeley, Calif., 1995.
11. Morgan M. G, and Henrion M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1990.
12. GAUSS Maximum Likelihood Estimation Module. Aptech Systems, Maple Valley, Wash., 1996.
13. Waddell P., Borning A., Noth M., Freier N., Becke M., and Ulfarsson G. UrbanSim: A Simulation System for Land Use and Transportation. http://www.urbansim.org/Papers/UrbanSim_NSE_Paper.pdf. Accessed 2001.
14. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
15. Sheffi Y., and Powell W. An Algorithm for the Equilibrium Assignment Problem with Random Link Times. Networks, Vol. 12, 1982, pp. 191–207.
16. Travel Demand Modeling with TransCAD 4.0. Caliper Corporation, Newton, Mass., 2001.
17. Traffic Assignment Manual. Bureau of Public Roads, Washington, D.C., 1964.
18. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. New Population and Employment Forecasts. CAMPO Newsletter, 2002, p. 1. http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/campo/downloads/march2002.pdf.
19. Pradhan A. Uncertainty Propagation in Land Use-Transportation Models: An Investigation of UrbanSim and ITLUP. Master’s thesis. University of Texas, Austin, 2001.
20. Pradhan A., and Kockelman K. Uncertainty Propagation in Land Use-Transportation Models. Proc., 13th Euro Mini Conference on Handling Uncertainty in the Analysis of Traffic and Transportation Systems, Bari, Italy, 2002.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2003
Issue published: January 2003

Rights and permissions

© 2003 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sriram Krishnamurthy
University of Texas at Austin, 6.9 E. Cockrell Jr. Hall, Austin, TX 78712-1076
Kara Maria Kockelman
University of Texas at Austin, 6.9 E. Cockrell Jr. Hall, Austin, TX 78712-1076

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 34

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 29

  1. Assessing the effects of input uncertainties on the outputs of a freig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Prediction of rare feature combinations in population synthesis: Appli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Three Methods for Anticipating and Understanding Uncertainty of Output...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Large-scale spatial population synthesis for Denmark
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Modeling the Proactive Driving Behavior of Connected Vehicles: A Cell‐...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Uncertainty analysis of the large zone economic module of the simple, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A study of micro-simulation uncertainty of space development module of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A logit-based model for measuring the effects of transportation infras...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Evaluating Toll Revenue Uncertainty Using Neural Network Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Exploring Model and Behavior Uncertainty: Temporal Transferability Ass...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A reinforcement learning approach for distance‐based dynamic tolling i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. How uncertainty in input and parameters influences transport model :ou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Calibration of an Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Model Using M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand mod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Sensitivity-based Uncertainty Analysis of a Combined Travel Demand Mod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Impact of Distribution Choice for Representing Input Variation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Outcome of Transportation Projects under Uncertainty: Examination of B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Backcasting for Sustainable Transportation Planning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Highway Improvement Project Rankings due to Uncertain Model Inputs: Ap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Relaxing the multivariate normality assumption in the simulation of tr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Understanding and Accommodating Risk and Uncertainty in Toll Road Proj...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Models of Transportation and Land Use Change: A Guide to the Territory
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Evaluation of the Trans-Texas Corridor Proposal: Application and Enhan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Multivariate uncertainty analysis of an integrated land use and transp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Road Pricing Simulations: Traffic, Land Use and Welfare Impacts for Au...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Credit-based congestion pricing: a policy proposal and the public’s re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Congestion pricing on a road network: A study using the dynamic equili...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Comparison of Second-Best and Third-Best Tolling Schemes on a Road Net...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Credit-Based Congestion Pricing: Travel, Land Value, and Welfare Impac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub