Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2003

Emerging Supply Chain Management Trends and Their Impact on Spatial Organization of Logistical Networks

Abstract

Although the development of supply chain management trends has been the subject of substantial research, little attention has been devoted to examining the impact of the emerging supply chain management (SCM) trends on the spatial organization of the supply and distribution system. Specifically, the literature lacks an integrated methodological framework for examining the impact of emerging SCM trends on decision making relative to the spatial organization of logistical networks. This analysis has three purposes—(a) develop a conceptual framework for analyzing how decisions are made on the spatial organization of logistical networks, (b) test the proposed framework via case studies, and (c) develop a preliminary set of guidelines on the essential elements in making strategic logistical network design decisions. An interesting finding in implementing the proposed methodological framework, which was further supported by the limited empirical research, is that decision-making requirements vary substantially among the industrial and service sectors. This variance reflects differences in objectives and the extent of integration and collaboration of business entities along the respective supply chains.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cooper M. C. Logistics in the Decade of the 1990s. The Logistics Handbook (Robeson J. F. and Copacino W. C., eds.), The Free Press, 1994, pp. 53–35.
2. COST 310. COST 310: Freight Transport Logistics (Chapuis M., Fabre F., and Zubero I., eds.), Final Report DG-VII. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 1993.
3. Diagnosis Report: Identifying the Main Policy, Business, Technical, and Social Issues Underlying the Evolution of Intermodal Transport. Transport Intermodality Task Force, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 1996.
4. O'Sullivan D. Logistics in Europe—The Vision and the Reality. Logistics Information Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1997, pp. 14–19.
5. McKinnon A. C., and Forster M. Full Report of the Delphi 2005 Survey—European Logistical and Supply Chain Trends: 1999–2000. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2000.
6. Towards the 21st Century. Trends and Strategies in European Logistics. European Logistics Association, Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
7. Zografos K. G., and Giannouli I. M. Development and Application of a Methodological Framework for Assessing SCM Trends. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2001.
8. Zografos K. G., and Giannouli I. M. Outsourcing Logistical Operations: Assessment of the Existing Situation and Industry Perspective (in Greek). Proc., 5th National SOLE Conference, Athens, Greece, Sept. 29-30, 2000.
9. Zografos K. G., and Giannouli I. M. Development and Implementation of a Methodological Approach for Evaluating Software Packages for Strategic SCM/Logistics Network Optimization and Identifying Best Practice. Transportation Systems and Logistics Laboratory, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece, 2001.
10. Blumenfeld D. E., Burns L. D., Daganzo C. F., Frick M. C., and Hall R. W. Reducing Logistics Costs at General Motors. Interfaces, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1987, pp. 26–47.
11. Geoffrion A. M., and Powers R. F. Twenty Years of Strategic Distribution System Design: An Evolutionary Perspective. Interfaces, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1995, pp. 105–127.
12. Stock G. N., Greis N. P., and Kasarda J. D. Logistics Strategy and Structure: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1999, pp. 224–239.
13. Stank T. P., and Goldsby T. J. A Framework for Transportation Decision Making in an Integrated Supply Chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2000, pp. 71–77.
14. Sabri E. H., and Beamon B. M. A Multi-Objective Approach to Simultaneous Strategic and Operational Planning in Supply Chain Design. Omega, Vol. 28, 1999, pp. 581–598.
15. Hernandez T., and Bennison D. The Art and Science of Retail Location Decisions. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2000, pp. 357–367.
16. Harland C. M., Lamming R. C., and Cousins P. D. Developing the Concept of Supply Strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 19, No. 7, 1999, pp. 650–573.
17. Anderson D. L., and Lee H. L. Synchronized Supply Chains: The New Frontier. http://www.ascet.com/ascet/wp/wp/wpAnderson.html. 1999.
18. Whiteoak P. The Realities of Quick Response in the Grocery Sector: A Supplier View Point. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 29, No. 7-8, 1999, pp. 508–519.
19. Jones R. M., and Towill D. R. Time Compression in the Supply Chain: Information Management Is the Vital Ingredient. Logistics Information Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1998.
20. Dornier P. P., Ernst R., Fender M., and Kouvelis P. Global Operations and Logistics: Text and Cases. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1998.
21. Bowersox D. J., and Closs D. J. Logistical Management. McGraw-Hill International, 1996.
22. Feitzinger E., and Lee H. L. Mass Customization at Hewlett-Packard. Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., 1997, pp. 116–121.
23. Van Hoek R. I. Logistics and Virtual Integration: Postponement, Outsourcing, and the Flow of Information. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 28, No. 7, 1998, pp. 508–523.
24. Van Hoek R. I., and van Dierdonck R. Postponed Manufacturing Supplementary to Transportation Services. Transportation Research, Part E, Vol. 36, 2000, pp. 205–217.
25. Lee H. L., and Billington C. The Evolution of Supply Chain Management: Models and Practices in Hewlett-Packard. Interfaces, Vol. 24, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., 1995, pp. 42–63.
26. Feitzinger E., and Lee H. L. Mass Customization at Hewlett-Packard. Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., 1997, pp. 116–121.
27. Noori H., and Lee W. B. Fractal Manufacturing Partnership: Exploring a New Form of Strategic Alliance Between OEMs and Suppliers. Logistics Information Management, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2000, pp. 301–311.
28. Christopher M. Marketing Logistics. Butterworth Heinemann, Woburn, Mass., 1997.
29. Simchi-Levi D., Kaminsky P., and Simchi-Levi E. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000.
30. Slack B. Satellite Terminals: A Local Solution to Hub Congestion? Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 7, 1999, pp. 241–246.
31. Lumsden K., Dallari F., and Ruggeri R. Improving the Efficiency of the Hub and Spoke Systems for the SKF European Distribution Network. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1999, pp. 50–64.
32. Notteboom T. E. Concentration and Load Center Development in European Container Port System. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1997, pp. 99–115.
33. Goetz A. R., and Rodrigue J. P. Transport Terminals: New Perspectives. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 7, 1999, pp. 237–240.
34. Daugherty P., and Pittman P. H. Utilization of Time-Based Strategies Creating Distribution Flexibility/Responsiveness. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1995, pp. 54–60.
35. Fernie J. Relationships in the Supply Chain. Logistics and Retail Management (Fernie J. and Sparks L., eds.), CRC Press, 1999.
36. Margretta J. The Power of Virtual Integration: An Interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell. Harvard Business Review, March–April, 1998, pp. 73–84.
37. Stank T. P., and Traichal P. A. Logistics Strategy, Organizational Design, and Performance in a Cross-Border Environment. Transportation Research, Part E, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1998, pp. 75–86.
38. Droge C., and Germain R. The Design of Logistics Organizations. Transportation Research, Part E, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1998, pp. 25–37.
39. Lee L. H. Create Value Through Supply Chain Integration. Supply Chain Management Review, Sept–Oct., 2000.
40. Giannouli M. I. Development and Implementation of a Model for Strategic Supply Chain System Management. Ph.D. dissertation. Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece, 2001.
41. Christopher M., and Towill D. R. Supply Chain Migration from Lean and Functional to Agile and Customized. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2000, pp. 206–213.
42. Rigby B. Continuous Acquisition and Life-Cycle Support: Risks and Benefits of Early Supplier Involvement in the Development Process. Logistics Information Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1996, pp. 22–26.
43. Sorensen U. M. Application of Functional Modeling in the Design of Industrial Control Systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 64, 1996, pp. 301–315.
44. Park T., and Kim K. J. Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 16, 1998, pp. 561–581.
45. Govers P. QFD: Not Just a Tool But a Way of Quality Management. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 69, No. 2, 1998, pp. 151–159.
46. Temponi C., Yen J., and Tiao W. A. House of Quality: A Fuzzy Logic–Based Requirements Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 117, 1999, pp. 340–354.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2003
Issue published: January 2003

Rights and permissions

© 2003 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Konstantinos G. Zografos
Transportation Systems and Logistics Laboratory, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, Evelpidon 47A and Lefkados 33, 113 62 Athens, Greece
loanna M. Giannouli
Transportation Systems and Logistics Laboratory, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, Evelpidon 47A and Lefkados 33, 113 62 Athens, Greece

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 32

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub