Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2003

University Transportation Survey: Transportation in University Communities

Abstract

Universities and transit agencies across the United States have been finding innovative ways of providing and financing mobility services on and around university campuses. Many transit agencies are providing substantially more service and moving substantially more riders than their counterparts in nonuniversity environments. Determining what types of relationships exist between transit performance and university policies or practices is the research premise. To that end, the purpose is to document the types of transportation policies, demographics, and land use characteristics that exist on university campuses, and to examine the relationship between transit performance, land use on university campuses, types of university communities, university transportation and parking policies, and student demographics. These characteristics of university transportation systems were examined through demographic data and a mailed questionnaire. The questionnaire was sent to 48 universities and transit agencies across the United States, with 23 responding with enough valid data and information to be included in the study. It has been demonstrated in a significant number of university communities across the country that transit performance is enhanced dramatically by certain fare policies. However, that enhancement differs from one community to the next. It is believed that the answer to maximizing transit performance can be found in a combination of factors and that the optimum mix can be identified empirically.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Brown J., Hess D. B., and Shoup D. Unlimited Access. Transportation, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2001, pp. 233–267.
2. United States Local and State Transportation Web Sites. American Public Transportation Association. www.apta.com/sites/transus/.
3. The Sesquicentennial Campus Planning Framework Update. Campus Planning Committee, University of Iowa. www.uiowa.edu/~cpc/cpf/cpf.htm.
4. University Transportation Systems’ Web Sites. American Public Transportation Association. www.apta.com/sites/univtrans.htm.
5. College and University Planning. The Society for College and University Planning. www.scup.org.
6. Bourne R. T., and Schauer P. Case Study in Land Use and Parking Regulations in Support of Campus Transit Services: Development of CY-RIDE in Ames, Iowa. Transportation Research Record 1266, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 181–186.
7. Miller J. H. Transportation on College and University Campuses. TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 39, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.
8. Cornell University. Commuting Solutions: Summary of Transportation Demand Management Program. Cornell University Office of Transportation Services, Ithaca, N.Y., undated.
9. Graves T. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Programs: Profiles of Selected Universities. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dec. 1993. www.fpm.wisc.edu/campusecology/cerp/tdm/tdm.htm.
10. McClatchey B. Employing Students—Can’t Get Enough of a Good Thing. Presented at Transportation and University Communities Conference of the American Public Transportation Association, Gainesville, Fla., April 2000.
11. Meyer J., and Beimborn E. A. Usage, Impacts, and Benefits of Innovative Transit Pass Program. Transportation Research Record 1618, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 131–138.
12. Meyer J., and Beimborn E. A. Evaluation of an Innovative Transit Pass Program: The UPASS. Report to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, March 1996. www.uwm.edu/Dept/CUTS/upassum.htm.
13. David Bamberger & Associates. Financial Feasibility: Proposed Free Faculty/Staff Bus Pass. Final Report. University of Colorado at Boulder, August 1999.
14. Miller J. H. Campus Transportation System Inventory. Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center, Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, University Park, Pa., Jan. 1992.
15. Milwaukee County Transit System. U-PASS Program. www.ridemcts.com/u-pass/index.asp.
16. Moriarty J. A., Patton R., and Volk W. The I System: A Campus and Community Bus System for the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana. Transportation Research Record 1297, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 125–135.
17. Poinsatte F., and Toor W. Finding a New Way: Campus Transportation for the Twenty-First Century. University of Colorado Environmental Center, Boulder, Colo., 1999.
18. Slack C. University, Referendum Spur Transit Growth. Busline, March/April 2000, pp. 18–30, 68.
19. Students Turn Out to Vote for U-Pass. UICNEWS, University of Illinois-Chicago, Sept. 27, 2000. www.uic.edu/depts/paff/uicnews/uic_archives/Archive/2000/20000927123007.html.
20. U-Pass Information. University of Minnesota. buspass.umn.edu/upass.html.
21. Segregated Fees—Fall 2000. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. www.uwm.edu/Dept/DES/Schedule/Fall/feeinfo.html#segregated.
22. U-Pass Annual Report: September 1998-September 1999. University of Washington. www.washington.edu/upass/getting_upass/what_is_upass.html.
23. Williams M. E., and Petrait K. L. U-PASS: A Model Transportation Management Program That Works. Transportation Research Record 1404, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 73–81.
24. Long Range Access Plan. University of California-Davis. www.taps.ucdavis.edu/LRP.htm.
25. Transportation Policy Committee. Preliminary Report and Recommendations. University of New Hampshire, Durham, April 2002.
26. Colorado State University Strategic Transportation Plan. Nelson/Nygaard Associates, City of Fort Collins, Fort Collins, Colo., 2002.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2003
Issue published: January 2003

Rights and permissions

© 2003 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John Daggett
Transportation Planning Department, City of Fort Collins, P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522
Richard Gutkowski
Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 746

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 20

  1. Gender Disparity in Travel Demand Management of University Students an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Evaluating sustainable development practices in a zero‑carbon universi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Transportation Service and Students Satisfaction A Study on Dhaka Univ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Providing discounted transit passes to younger university students: Ar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Towards a sustainable campus-city relationship: A systematic review of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Determinants of transportation sustainability in universities of Islam...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Revamping the Vermillion Public Transit System
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Characterization of travel behavior at a university campus: A case stu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Consultation on elecro-mobility in the framework of a living lab
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. An In-Depth Analysis of Parking Patterns in a Typical Chinese Danwei v...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Managing campus parking demand through course scheduling – an approach...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Parking Demand vs Supply: An Optimization-Based Approach at a Universi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Impact of College Provided Transportation on the Absenteeism and Acade...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Survey to Explore Behavior, Intelligent Transportation Systems Needs, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. A methodology based on parking policy to promote sustainable mobility ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Applying Behavior Change Theory to Predict Travel Behavior of Universi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Thought About Parking Charge on Campus
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Reducing Automobile Dependency on Campus Using Transport Demand Manage...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Parking on University Campus: How to Avoid the Tragedy of Commons?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Reducing parking demand and traffic congestion at the American Univers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub