Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2003

Customer Perspectives on Multilevel Coaches for Increasing Rail System Capacity

Abstract

The numbers and lengths of New Jersey Transit (NJT) commuter trains accessing New York’s Penn Station are currently at the limits of available capacity during peak periods, as evidenced by the significant number of standees at these times. NJT is planning to purchase multilevel coaches to address this critical passenger capacity issue. A study was conducted to determine the design of these multilevel coaches so that they will provide the extra capacity needed and also reflect customers’ preferences. The study focused on interior issues, including the seating configuration and seat design, that relate directly to the amount of seated (and standee) capacity on the new coaches. A two-part research approach was used to obtain customer input. First, focus groups and product clinics were conducted to get qualitative feedback on the multilevel coach concepts and on specific seat designs. A detailed, computer-based survey was administered to customers to quantify their preferences among key elements of the multilevel concepts, and to estimate their willingness to pay for those elements. The study found that additional seating capacity in the configuration preferred by customers provides a substantial net benefit to NJT passengers, equivalent to about $2.20 fare value per trip. The benefits are higher for this application because of the crowded conditions on existing trains. The study also suggests that multilevel coaches and improved interior design have benefits well beyond increased capacity.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. ACA 5.0 Technical Paper. Technical Paper Series. Sawtooth Software, Inc., Sequim, Wash., 2002.
2. Richardson A. J. Simulation Study of the Estimation of Individual Specific Values of Time by Using an Adaptive Stated-Preference Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1804, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 117–125.
3. Falzarano S., Adler T., and Hazlett R. Quantifying the Value of Transit Station and Access Improvements for Chicago’s Rapid Transit System. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2003
Issue published: January 2003

Rights and permissions

© 2003 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Janice Pepper
New Jersey Transit, One Penn Plaza, Newark, NJ 07105
Gregory Spitz
Resource Systems Group, 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, VT 05001
Thomas Adler
Resource Systems Group, 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, VT 05001

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. Passenger-oriented traffic control for rail networks: An optimization ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Valuations on quality of service for intercity travels using high-spee...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Observed Customer Seating and Standing Behavior and Seat Preferences o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Crowding and public transport: A review of willingness to pay evidence...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Characteristics of premium transit services that affect mode choice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Identifying commuter preferences for existing modes and a proposed Met...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Restating modal investment priority with an improved model for public ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Comparing operator and users costs of light rail, heavy rail and bus r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub