Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2003

Statistical Procedure Using an Expert Panel for Procurement of Emerging Transportation Technologies

Abstract

State departments of transportation (DOTs) rely on established standards and open and competitive bidding to procure materials and technologies. This process hinders the implementation of new technologies until such standards are developed. A time lag occurs between the commercial introduction and implementation of new technologies, often delaying deployment of safety and cost improvement items by many years. One solution to this time lag is to prequalify products and technologies and use competitive bidding for procurement. The task is to develop a workable prequalification procedure that will satisfy acceptable standards of fairness. A procedure is proposed and is illustrated with a case study. The procedure uses an expert panel performing blind evaluations of prospective products and technologies. A longitudinal repeated measures design on two factors was developed. Pass-fail criteria were established. Evaluation test questions and a measurement scale were developed. Analysis-of-variance models were used for two rating response variables and a ranking response variable. Model assumptions were checked and departures were noted. The DOT involved in the study will use the procedure as a prototype for future testing of new technologies.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Walker V., and Upchurch J. Effective Countermeasures to Reduce Accidents in Work Zones. Arizona Transportation Research Center Project 467 Research Notes. Arizona Transportation Research Center, 1999.
2. Hummer J. E., and Scheffler C. R. Driver Performance Comparison of Fluorescent Orange to Standard Orange Work Zone Traffic Signs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1657, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 55–62.
3. Jenssen G. D., and Brekke B. A. Study of the Visibility and Effectiveness of Fluorescent Retroreflective Traffic Control Signing in Work Zone Applications. Report S-581 95. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linkoping, Sweden, 1998.
4. Burns D. M., and Johnson N. L. The Correlation of Measured Spectral Radiance of Fluorescent and Non-Fluorescent Materials to Perceived Conspicuity Under Natural Lighting. Die Farbe, Vol. 43, No. 4–6, 1997, pp. 185–203.
5. De Vos A. P., Alferdinck J. W. A. M., and Bakker P. J. Fluorescent Retroreflective Signing of Work Zones. Report TM-98-C044. TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, Netherlands, Aug. 1998.
6. Dutt N., Hummer J. E., and Clark K. L. User Preference for Fluorescent Strong Yellow-Green Pedestrian Crossing Signs. In Transportation Research Record 1605, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 17–21.
7. Dutt N., Hummer J. E., Clark K. L., and Blakely S. Controlled-Environment Evaluation of Fluorescent Strong Yellow-Green Pedestrian-Crossing Sign Prototypes. In Transportation Research Record 1553, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 86–94.
8. Schnell T., Ohme P. J., Gulyuva K. F., Donaubauer C., Wiese E., Derby E., and Noelting D. Driver Looking Behavior in School Zones with Fluorescent Yellow-Green and Normal Yellow Signs. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
9. Schnell T., Bentley K., Hayes E., and Rick M. Legibility Distances of Fluorescent Traffic Signs and Their Normal Color Counterparts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1754, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 31–41.
10. ADOT Traffic Engineering Policies, Guidelines, and Procedures, Section 300-Signs. Arizona Department of Transportation, May 2001, pp. 380–382.
11. Montgomery D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1997.
12. Neter J., Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., and Wasserman W. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed. Irwin, Chicago, Ill., 1996.
13. Conover W. J. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1999.
14. Hawkins H. G. Jr., Carlson P. J., and Elmquist M. Evaluation of Fluorescent Orange Signs: Project Summary. Report 2962-S. Texas Department of Transportation and Texas Transportation Institute, 1998.
15. DeVellis R. F. Scale Development: Theory and Application. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 1991.
16. Fink A. How to Ask Survey Questions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 1995.
17. Poppe M. J., Roberts C. A., and Chalmers S. W. Fluorescent Orange Sign Sheeting Evaluation. Report FHWA-AZ-01-116(1). Arizona Transportation Research Center, Arizona Department of Transportation, 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2003
Issue published: January 2003

Rights and permissions

© 2003 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Craig A. Roberts
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 15600, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5600
Mark J. Poppe
, City of Glendale, Arizona, 5850 West Glendale Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85301
Seth W. Chalmers
, Chalmers Engineering Service, Inc., 1451 North El Camino Drive, Tempe, AZ 85281

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 11

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub