Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2003

Measuring the Role of Transportation in Facilitating Welfare-to-Work Transition: Evidence from Three California Counties

Abstract

Welfare-to-Work transportation programs are premised on a conceptualization of the spatial mismatch hypothesis that focuses on the physical separation between the central city locations of welfare participants, rapidly expanding job opportunities in the suburbs, and the long commutes needed to connect them. Using data from three diverse California counties, welfare recipients’ spatial access to employment was examined. The results indicate that the traditional notion of the spatial mismatch is less relevant to welfare recipients, many of whom live in counties in which the urban structure does not fit the simple model of poor, central-city neighborhoods and distant, job-rich suburbs. Many welfare recipients live in job-rich areas; others live in neighborhoods that are spatially isolated from employment. Therefore, to be effective, transportation policies must be tailored to the diverse characteristics of the neighborhoods in which welfare recipients live.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Allard S. W., and Danziger S. Proximity and Opportunity: How Residence and Race Affect the Employment of Welfare Recipients. University of Michigan, School of Social Work, Program on Poverty and Social Welfare Policy, Ann Arbor, Sept. 2000. www.ssw.umich.edu/poverty/jpam91.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2002.
2. Blumenberg E. On the Way to Work: Welfare Participants and Barriers to Employment. Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2002, pp. 314–325.
3. Blumenberg E., and Ong P. Job Accessibility and Welfare Usage: Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1998, pp. 639–657.
4. Cervero R., Sandoval O., and Landis J. The Value of Transportation in Stimulating Welfare-to-Work Transitions: Evidence from San Francisco. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2002, pp. 50–63.
5. Danziger S., Corcoran M., Danziger D., Heflin C., Kalil A., Levine J., Rosen D., Seefeldt K., Siefert K., and Tolman R. Barriers to the Employment of Welfare Recipients. In Prosperity for All? The Economic Boom and African Americans (Cherry R. and Rodgers W. M. III, eds.). Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2000, pp. 245–278.
6. Ong P. Work and Car Ownership Among Welfare Recipients. Social Work Research, Vol. 2, 1996, pp. 255–262.
7. Ong P. Car Access and Welfare-to-Work. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 21, 2002, pp. 239–252.
8. Ong P., and Blumenberg E. Job Access, Commute, and Travel Burden Among Welfare Recipients. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1998, pp. 77–93.
9. Bania N., Leete L., Coulton C., and Harris L. F. Job Access for Urban Neighborhoods: A Tool for Improving Welfare-to-Work Policy and Practice. The Job Access Measurement System. Case Western Reserve University, Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change, Cleveland, Ohio, 2000.
10. Jeskey C. Linking People to the Workplace. Community Transportation Association of America, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2000.
11. The Challenge of Job Access: Moving Toward a Solution. FHWA-PD-98-038. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA, FTA, 1998.
12. Rich M. Access to Opportunities: The Welfare-to-Work Challenge in Metropolitan Atlanta. Paper presented at the Annual Fall Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1999.
13. Sawicki D. S., and Moody M. Developing Transportation Alternatives for Welfare Recipients Moving to Work. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 66, No. 3, Summer 2000, pp. 306–318.
14. Access to Jobs in the Baltimore Region, 1999. Citizens Planning and Housing Association. www.ctaa.org/data/baltimore_atj_report.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2002.
15. Lacombe A. Welfare Reform and Access to Jobs in Boston. BTS98-A-02. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass., Jan. 1998.
16. Pugh M. Barriers to Work: The Spatial Divide Between Jobs and Welfare Recipients in Metropolitan Areas. Discussion paper. Brookings Institution Center for Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, D.C., 1998. www.brook.edu/es/urban/mismatch.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2002.
17. Thakuriah P., Sen A., Soot S., Metzxatos P., Yanos G., Dirks L., Yang D., and Sternberg T. Implications of the Welfare Reform Law on Suburban Chicago Transit Demand. Final Report. University of Illinois at Chicago, Urban Transportation Center, July 1999.
18. Bania N., Coulton C., and Leete L. Welfare Reform and Access to Job Opportunities in the Cleveland Metropolitan Area. Paper presented at the Annual Fall Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1999.
19. Laube M., Lyons W., and vanderWilden P. Transportation Planning for Access to Jobs. Job Access and the Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process in Hartford, St. Louis, and Detroit. U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass., 1997. www.fta.dot.gov/office/planning/access.htm#Detroit,%20Michigan. Accessed April 1, 2002.
20. Blumenberg E., and Ong P. Cars, Buses, and Jobs: Welfare Recipients and Employment Access in Los Angeles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1756, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 22–31.
21. Access-to-Jobs, 1999. New York Metropolitan Transportation Council. www.nymtc.org/access/default.html. Accessed April 1, 2002.
22. Ihlanfeldt K. R., and Sjoquist D. L. The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: A Review of Recent Studies and Their Implications for Welfare Reform. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 9, 1998, pp. 849–892.
23. Shen Q. A Spatial Analysis of Job Openings and Access in a U.S. Metropolitan Area. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 67, No. 1, Winter 2001, pp. 53–68.
24. Pawasarat J., and Stetzer F. Removing Transportation Barriers to Employment: Assessing Driver’s License and Vehicle Ownership Patterns of Low-Income Populations. University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Employment and Training Institute, July 1998. www.uwm.edu/Dept/ETI/dot.htm. Accessed April 1, 2002.
25. E-1 City/County Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change: January 1, 2001 and 2002. California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, Sacramento, 2002.
26. Historical Census Populations of California State, Counties, Cities, Places, and Towns, 1850-2000. California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, Sacramento, no date.
27. CalWORKs Cash Grant Caseload Movement Report. Report CA 237 CW. California Department of Social Services, Sacramento, Jan. 2002.
28. Annual Average Labor Force Data for Counties, Year 2001. 2002 Benchmark. Not Seasonally Adjusted. California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information Division, Sacramento, Feb. 2002.
29. Summary Tape File. U.S. Census Bureau, 2000.
30. American Business Directory. American Business Institute, 2000.
31. Summary Tape File 1. U.S. Census Bureau, 1990.
32. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The State of the Cities 2000. Megaforces Shaping the Future of the Nation’s Cities. Fourth Annual Report. Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, D.C., 2000.
33. Olson K., and Pavetti L. Personal and Family Challenges to the Successful Transition from Welfare to Work: How Prevalent Are These Potential Barriers to Employment? Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2003
Issue published: January 2003

Rights and permissions

© 2003 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Evelyn Blumenberg
Department of Urban Planning, School of Public Policy and Social Research, University of California–Los Angeles, 3250 Public Policy Building, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1656
Daniel Hess Hess
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Architecture and Planning, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, 116 Hayes Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214-3087

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 106

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 32

  1. Spatial Inequity of Transit and Automobile Access Gap across America f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Estimating Public Transportation Accessibility in Metropolitan Areas: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A spatiotemporal disparity of transit and automobile access gap and it...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Minority travel disparities and residential segregation: Evidence from...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Spatial equity of modal access gap to multiple destination types acros...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. A spatiotemporal analysis of transit accessibility to low-wage jobs in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Travel mode and participation in structured activities among U.S. teen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Beyond households: regional determinants of housing instability among ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Spatial Mismatch, Job Access, and Reverse Commuting
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Discriminations in the market for “Lemons”: A multicriteria correspond...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Faciliter la mobilité quotidienne des jeunes éloignés de l’emploi : un...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Commuting inequity and its determinants in Shanghai: New findings from...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Impact of commuting, time budgets, and activity durations on modal dis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Building reverse commute typologies through urban and suburban socioec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. First/last mile transit access as an equity planning issue
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. The Drive to Work...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Does enhanced mobility of young people improve employment and housing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Affordable housing in National Register districts: recognizing the adv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Transportation needs of low income population: a policy analysis for t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Who, What, When, and Where...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. THE EFFECT OF WELFARE ASSET RULES ON AUTO OWNERSHIP, EMPLOYMENT, AND W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Determinants of Mode Share over Time...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Accessibility for Low-Income Workers in New Orleans, Louisiana, after ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Towards equitable transit: examining transit accessibility and social ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Individual and contextual socioeconomic disadvantages and car driving ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Employment status and commute distance of Canadians with disabilities
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Cars, Employment, and Single Mothers: The Effect of Welfare Asset Rest...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Job Access, Employment and Earnings: Outcomes for Welfare Leavers in a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Commuting Inequality between Cars and Public Transit: The Case of the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Access to Employment for Adults in Poverty in the Buffalo-Niagara Regi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Beyond the Spatial Mismatch: Welfare Recipients and Transportation Pol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub