Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Mechanically Stabilized Earth Reinforcement Tensile Strength from Tests of Geotextile-Reinforced Soil

Abstract

Bridge abutments made of geotextile-reinforced soil have been shown to support the bridge load without the use of piles. However, current design procedures are considered to be conservative. To determine the strength, and to understand better the behavior of reinforced soil, large unconfined cylindrical soil samples reinforced with geosynthetics were axisymmetrically loaded. Samples were 2.5 ft (0.76 m) in diameter and 5 ft (1.52 m) in height. Peak strengths of 4.8 kips/ft2 (230 kPa) to 9.6 kips/ft2 (460 kPa) at 3% to 8.5% vertical strain were obtained from cylinders reinforced with geotextiles at 6-in. (152-mm) vertical spacing. A strength reduction occurred after the peak strength, but most of the loads were sustained up to at least 10% strain before yielding. Tension in the reinforcement appears to be mobilized first in the middle layers, as determined from the location of tears in the geotextile. An equation to calculate the tensile force in the reinforcement, Tmax, in a reinforced bridge abutment is proposed. The normalized strains led to the development of the strain distribution factor incorporated in the proposed equation. The proposed equation is slightly more conservative or almost equal, depending on the type of facing, when compared with the Ko-stiffness method, but gives values approximately one-half of those obtained using the National Concrete Masonry Association and FHWA Demonstration Project 82 methods.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Jones C. J. F. P. Earth Reinforcement and Soil Structures. ASCE Press, New York, 1996.
2. Vidal H. The Principle of Reinforced Earth. In Highway Research Record 282, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1969, pp. 1–16.
3. Elias V., and Christopher B. R. Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes—Design and Construction Guidelines FHWA Demonstration Project 82. FHWA, Office of Technology Applications, Washington, D.C., 1996.
4. Adams M. Reinforced Soil Technology—Making Old Technology New. Geotechnical Fabrics Report, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2000, pp. 34–37.
5. Adams M., Ketchart K., Ruckman A., DiMillio A. F., Wu J., and Satyanarayana R. Reinforced Soil for Bridge Support Applications on Low-Volume Roads. In Transportation Research Record 1652, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 150–160.
6. Wu J. T. H., Ketchart K., and Adams M. GRS Bridge Piers and Abutments. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-038. FHWA, Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, McLean, Va., 2001.
7. Devin S. C., Keller G. R., and Barrett R. K. Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Bridge Abutments Fill the Gap at Mammoth Lakes, California. Proc., 36th Annual Engineering Geology and Geotechnical Engineering Symposium, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nev., March 28-31, 2001.
8. Abu-Hejleh N., Outcalt W., Wang T., and Zornberg J. G. Performance of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Walls Supporting the Founders/Meadows Bridge and Approaching Roadway Structures-Report 1: Design, Materials, Construction, Instrumentation and Preliminary Results. Report No. CDOT-DTD-R-2000-5. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, Colo., 2000.
9. Zornberg J. G., Abu-Hejleh N., and Wang T. Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments—Measuring the Performance of Geosynthetic Reinforcement in a Colorado Bridge Structure. Geotechnical Fabrics Report, Vol. 19, 2001, pp. 52–55.
10. Abu-Hejleh N. M., Zornberg J. G., Elias V., and Watcharamonthein J. Design Assessment of Founders-Meadows GRS Abutment Structure. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
11. Powell W., Keller G. R., and Brunette B. Applications for Geosynthetics on Forest Service Low-Volume Roads. In Transportation Research Record No. 1652, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 113–120.
12. Barrett B., and Ruckman A. Geosynthetics in Jamaica. Geotechnical Fabrics Report, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1996, pp. 28–31.
13. Collin J. G., ed. Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls, 2nd ed. National Concrete Masonry Association, Herndon, Va., 1996.
14. Allen T., and Bathurst R. Application of the Ko-Stiffness Method to Reinforced Soil Wall Limit States Design. Final Research Report to the Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle, Wash., 2001.
15. Broms B. B. Triaxial Tests with Fabric-Reinforced Soil. Proc. of the International Conference on the Use of Fabric in Geotechnics, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris, France, Vol. 3, 1977, pp. 129–134.
16. Gray D. H., and Al-Refeai T. Behavior of Fabric vs. Fiber-Reinforced Sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 8, 1986, pp. 804–820.
17. Chandrasekaran B., Broms B., and Wong K. S. Strength of Fabric Reinforced Sand Under Axisymmetric Loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 8, 1989, pp. 293–310.
18. Ashmawy A. K., and Bourdeau P. L. Effect of Geotextile Reinforcement on the Stress-Strain and Volumetric Response of Sand. Proc., 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Atlanta, Ga., Vol. 2, 1998, pp. 1079–1082.
19. Haeri S. M., Noorzad R., and Oskoorouchi A. M. Effect of Geotextile Reinforcement on the Mechanical Behavior of Sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2000, pp. 385–402.
20. Gray D. H., Athanasopoulos G. A., and Ohashi H. Internal/External Fabric Reinforcement of Sand. Proc., 2nd International Conference on Geotextiles, Las Vegas, Nev., Vol. 3, 1982, pp. 805–809.
21. Futaki M., Suzuki H., and Yamato S. Super Large Triaxial Tests on Reinforced Sand with High Strength Geogrid. Proc., 4th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Hague, Netherlands, Vol. 2, 1990, pp. 759–764.
22. Al-Omari R. R., Nazhat Y. N., and Dobaissi H. H. Effect of Stiffness and Amount of Reinforcement on Strength of Sand. Journal of Engineering Geology, Vol. 28, 1995, pp. 363–367.
23. Long N. T., Legeay G., and Madani C. Soil-Reinforcement Friction in a Triaxial Test. Proc., 8th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Helsinki, Finland, Vol. 1, 1983, pp. 381–384.
24. Bowles J. E. Foundation Analysis and Design, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1988.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David J. Elton
Auburn University, 238 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn University, AL 36849
Maria Aries B. Patawaran
Auburn University, 238 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn University, AL 36849

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 54

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 22

  1. The Measurement of Shear Characteristics of Paddy Soil in Poyang Lake ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Mechanical Responses of Soil-Geosynthetic Composite (SGC) Mass under F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Laboratory Testing and Theoretical Modeling of Deformations of Reinfor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Numerical Simulation of Compaction Load on Stress-Deformation Behavior...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Analytical framework for prediction of facing connection loads in rein...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Numerical investigation of reinforcement pullout resistance effects on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Impacts of Compaction Load and Procedure on Stress-Deformation Behavio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Responses of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments under bridge...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Geosentetik Donatı Sayısı ve Konumunun Farklı Boyutlu Yol Numuneleri Ü...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Laboratory pullout test study on the influence zone of geosynthetics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Characteristics of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls: an Overvi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Experimental and theoretical studies on the ultimate bearing capacity ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Two and three-dimensional numerical analyses of geosynthetic-reinforce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. An automated approach for the design of Mechanically Stabilized Earth ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Shear-Induced Failure and Static Liquefaction in Reinforced Soil and T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Analysis of Stress-Deformation Behavior of Soil-Geosynthetic Composite...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Composite Properties from Instrumented Load Tests on Mini-Piers Reinfo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Reinforcement Load and Compression of Reinforced Soil Mass under Surch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Connection Stability Analysis of Segmental Geosynthetic Reinforced Soi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. An analytical model for predicting load–deformation behavior of the FH...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Mini-Pier Testing To Estimate Performance of Full-Scale Geosynthetic R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Suppression of Soil Dilation—A Reinforcing Mechanism of Soil-Geosynthe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub