Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Stiffness Estimates Using Portable Deflectometers

Abstract

The use of falling weight deflectometers and portable falling weight deflectometers (PFWDs) is now common for field characterization of pavement system layers. In particular, the application of portable deflectometers in quality assurance of newly constructed granular base has become more widespread. Typically, these devices are used for an in situ assessment of the Young's modulus of the base layer. The traditional backcalculation uses an elastostatic half-space framework to relate Young's modulus of the pavement foundation to the stiffness estimates obtained from force and velocity measurements. The data interpretation method that is customarily used for stiffness estimation uses peak values of the force and displacement records in lieu of their static counterparts. The performance of a particular device, PRIMA 100, was examined with the newly developed beam verification tester (BVT) of known static stiffness. It was shown that the conventional, peak-based method of backanalysis produces incorrect estimates of the static stiffness of the BVT. An alternative, spectral-based data interpretation method was proposed. This method, based on (a) concept and measurement of the frequency response function and (b) a single-degree-of-freedom mechanical model, was employed to extract the true static stiffness from PRIMA 100 measurements. The results show a good agreement between the true static stiffness of the BVT and its PFWD estimates stemming from the modified approach. The BVT apparatus can therefore be used to assess the performance of the sensors and data interpretation of PRIMA 100-type deflectometers.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Lytton R. L. Backcalculation of Layer Moduli—State of the Art. In Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli. ASTM STP 1026 (Bush A. J. III and Baladi G. Y., eds.), Philadelphia, Pa., 1989, pp. 7–38.
2. Hardin B. O., and Drnevich V. P. Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Design Equations and Curves. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 98 (SM7), 1972, pp. 667–693.
3. Chen D-H., and Bilyeu J. Comparison of Resilient Moduli Between Field and Laboratory Testing: Case Study. Presented at 78th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C, 1999.
4. Siekmeier J. A., Young D., and Beberg D. Comparison of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer with Other Tests During Subgrade and Granular Base Characterization in Minnesota. In Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli, Vol. 3. ASTM STP 1375 (Tayabji S. D. and Lukanen E. O., eds.), West Conshohocken, Pa., 1999.
5. McKane R. In Situ Field Testing of Mechanical Properties. Presented at 48th Annual Geotechnical Engineering Conference, University of Minnesota, Young Engineer Paper Competition, 2000.
6. Van Gurp C., Groenendijk J., and Beuving E. Experience with Various Types of Foundation Tests. Presented at Fifth International Symposium on Unbound Aggregates in Roads (UNBAR5), Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2000.
7. Fleming P. R., Lambert J. P., Frost M. W., and Rogers C. D. In Situ Assessment of Stiffness Modulus for Highway Foundations During Construction. Presented at Ninth International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000.
8. Hoffmann O. J.-M., Guzina B. B., and Drescher A. Enhancements and Verification Tests for Portable Deflectometers. Final Report 2003-10. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2003.
9. Craig R. F. Soil Mechanics, 6th ed. Chapman & Hall, London, U.K., 1997.
10. Roesset J. M., and Shao K-Y. Dynamic Interpretation of Dynaflect and Falling Weight Deflectometer Tests. In Transportation Research Record 1022, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 7–16.
11. Guzina B. B., and Osburn R. H. Effective Tool for Enhancing Elastostatic Pavement Diagnosis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1806, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 30–37.
12. Briaud J.-L., and Lepert P. WAK Test to Find Spread Footing Stiffness. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1990, pp. 274–286.
13. Bendat J. S., and Piersol A. G. Random Data Analysis and Measurement Procedures. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 2000.
14. Nelder J. A., and Mead R. A Simplex Method for Function Minimization. Computer Journal, Vol. 7, 1965, pp. 308–313.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Olivier J. -M. Hoffmann
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455
Bojan B. Guzina
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455
Andrew Drescher
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 19

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 7

  1. Back-Calculation of Elastic Modulus of High Liquid Limit Clay Subgrade...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Effect of soil parameters on modulus of resilience based on portable f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Improved testing method of dynamic cone penetrometer in laboratory for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Back-calculation of elastic modulus of soil and subgrade from portable...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Analysis of Lightweight Deflectometer Test Based on In Situ Stress and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Field Monitoring of Roller Vibration during Compaction of Subgrade Soi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Factors Affecting Portable Falling Weight Deflectometer Measurements
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub