Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Implementing Highway Preventive Maintenance: Comparing Challenges, Processes, and Solutions in Three States

Abstract

One of the central challenges facing today's state transportation policymakers is how to incorporate preventive maintenance concepts and strategies into existing asset-management systems. Seven unique challenges to implementing preventive maintenance are identified in the literature and elsewhere, and a discussion covers the ways states have addressed those challenges through various implementation strategies. Then, case studies provide examples of how that incorporation has occurred in the departments of transportation in Michigan, Kansas, and Nebraska. The three case studies are presented in an effort to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of these three unique approaches, herein labeled the top-down approach, for Michigan; the bottom-up approach, for Kansas; and the inclusive approach, for Nebraska. In particular, an examination is presented of how preventive maintenance concepts were integrated into the planning, budgeting, and technical needs-assessment for state highways.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chong G. J., and Phang W. A. Improved Preventive Maintenance: Sealing Cracks in Flexible Pavements in Cold Regions. In Transportation Research Record 1205, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 12–19.
2. Ponniah J. Crack Sealing in Flexible Pavements: A Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Report PAV-92-04. Research and Development Branch, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Downsville, Ontario, Canada, 1992.
3. Chong G. J. Rout and Seal Cracks in Flexible Pavement—A Cost-Effective Preventive Maintenance Procedure. In Transportation Research Record 1268, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 8–16.
4. Comprehensive Report on Preventive Maintenance. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 1992.
5. Zaniewski J., and Mamlouk M. Pavement Preventive Maintenance: Key to Quality Highways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1680, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 26–29.
6. Hicks R. G., Moulthrop J. S., and Daleiden J. Selecting a Preventive Maintenance Treatment for Flexible Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1680, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 1–12.
7. Davies R. M., and Sorenson J. Pavement Preservation: Preserving Our Investment in Highways. Public Roads, Vol. 63, No. 4, Jan.-Feb. 2000. www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/jan00/pavement.htm
8. Najafi F. T., and Paredes V. Cost—Benefit Highway Pavement Maintenance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1749, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 22–27.
9. Carpenter V., and Feroz E. Institutional Theory and Accounting Rule Choice: An Analysis of Four U.S. State Governments' Decisions to Adopt Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 26, 2001, pp. 565–596.
10. de Lancer Julnes P., and Holzer M. Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation. Public Administration Review, Vol. 61, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2001, pp. 693–703.
11. Transportation Asset Management Plan. Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, 2000.
12. Osborne D., and Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming America. Penguin Books, New York, 1992.
13. Miller R. W. Why (Not How) Kansas Department of Transportation's Pavement Management System Works and How Preventive Maintenance Actions Are Integrated. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
14. Long Term Transportation Plan. Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, 2002.
15. 2002 State Highway Needs Assessment. Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln, 2002.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Deborah A. Carroll
Department of Political Science, University of Tennessee, 1001 McClung Tower, Knoxville, TN 37996-0410
Rita Cheng
School of Business Administration, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 742, Milwaukee, WI 53201
Robert J. Eger, III
Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, MSC 6C0401, 33 Gilmer Street SE, Atlanta, GA 30303-3082
Lara Grusczynski
Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, 3210 North Maryland Avenue, Bolton Hall 674, Milwaukee, WI 53201
Justin Marlowe
Department of Public Administration, University of Kansas, 1541 Lilac Lane, No. 308, Lawrence, KS 66044
Hani H. Titi
Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 784, Milwaukee, WI 53201-0784

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Prioritizing Infrastructure Maintenance and Rehabilitation Activities ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Field Evaluation and Cost-Effectiveness of Saw and Seal Method to Cont...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Outsourcing Decision Making in Public Organizations...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub